Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Seeing Is Believing!

Rate this question


Bigred122

Question

Why does the VA even have a disability program if they aren't going to play fair? I learned early that the VA played the game of LIFE by their own rules.And if they didn't have a rule for it, they made one up just for us and it would only be used once so that it wouldn't be considered the rule of Law.Last weekend, I received my medical records for my first 2 years in the sevice from the NPRC. Being in sports all my life, I was a suck up the pain kinda guy, so I didn't go a medical facility unless it was emergency in nature. So my records were a whole 12 pages long.(I create more nowadays in just one day) And to make me feel like one of the gang, two pages were missing.Would you believe those two pages just happen to be very important to my claim?(Silly me, you all have been at this for years and have heard this story a thousand times.) I know we have people from the VA who come here. Can someone explain to me why these records disappear. Are they paid to process claims or are they paid to sabotage claims. It happens so regularly, it just can't be fate.It has to be on purpose.The odds at them losing 2 pages out of 14 and those 2 pages being key to me getting disability must be HUGE. They did screwup and leave 1 page that may help me on my AO claim from FT Gordon .I don't remember my visit to the hospital there, but it occurred after 2 weekends of guard duty at one of the AO dump sites.It showed a strange rash, dizzyness, diarreaha, and a strange weakness. It was on a important medical document from Basic trainning.One of the page/pages missing was a 4 day stay at the base clinic/make do hospital for unknown reasons. This was key evidence again to my exposure to AO. The other document was a visit to mental health DR. In the letter they sent with my records, they said to call and give them special permission to send other misc records. Of course when I called them today, they had no clue to what the record clerk was talking about. So I told them what was missing and they said they would check again. (Some things have to be authorized twice by me makes no sense)I told them I was up against a 4/29 deadline, so hopefully they will be found.lol I can't believe that there isn't some hidden rule that says to deny deny deny! Lets keep the playing field fair and just decide things on the evidence. It's too late for me now, but I suggest if your thinking about filing a claim, get ALL your records first. Then file your your claim. By filing first they know what records to make disappear. They are the dealer in this card game and they decide what cards we get or don't get.Thanks for giving me a place to vent.Deadline date is approaching in 2 weeks so the end might be near for dealing with this silly game. Get my approval/denial and then to decide what to do. A hundred trees gave their life, just to save a few more government jobs.Was it worth it? We will see!! Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Posted Images

Recommended Posts

I hope this Fast Letter is here in the Fast letter forum as to Hepatitus claims:

http://www.hepatitis.va.gov/pdf/jet-injectors.pdf

Re a potential Tort claim:

“The illegal practice should out weigh the 2 year statue of limitations since I have just recently have been made aware of my past rights.”

I disagree. That will be a problem. We have significant info here under FTCA.The VA doctors should do many things when they themselves feel a medical error has occurred. Sometimes they do take action.

I am a successful FTCAer so I am familiar with FTCA case law.

They were hoping in my husband's case No one would ever find out what they did to him.

The VA does not give one hoot in hell about a claimant's rights when it comes to the FTCA Statute of Limits.

If a VA doctor feels something has gone wrong in VA care,they are supposed to report it and advise you of your 'rights'

As I mentioned sometimes they do that.If they don't it is up to the patient to do something-

"He owes me since he failed to let me know the options I had with botched surgery.(He was my PCP at the time.But also #2 man on hospital staff) He not only didn't tell me of options, he lied to me about everything. From what I have found about that time period, they not only were to notify me that I could file a tort claim, but were suppose to help me gather the info I" etc

They will NOT in probably about 98% of any case of a medical error -advise any veteran to file a FTCA claim.(or file an "Incident Report")

And they will definitely NOT help gather info to support it.

You could consider the Section 1151 info in the FTCA forum here at hadit.

No time limit for 1151 claims.

The basis is the same as for FTCA:

Documented proof of medical negligence, error or malpractice and

documented proof it cased additional disability or death.

“CERVICAL SPONDYLOSIS

DATE OF ONSET: 2001”

It seemed to me this was only disability the C & P doc said had it's onset during service.This was due to a fall inservice?

These pdfs were not easy for me to read.I guess the copies you have are very light.

“see if my early forced PCP will write a nexus letter on my AO part of my claim since that was one of his specialities “

Where were you exposed to AO and when?

Sorry if you already answered that her.I forgot what you said.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never mind on the AO question.

If you can prove exposure at Fort Gordon to AO that will be great.

Jim Cripps did it.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope this Fast Letter is here in the Fast letter forum as to Hepatitus claims:

http://www.hepatitis...t-injectors.pdf

Re a potential Tort claim:

“The illegal practice should out weigh the 2 year statue of limitations since I have just recently have been made aware of my past rights.”

I disagree. That will be a problem. We have significant info here under FTCA.The VA doctors should do many things when they themselves feel a medical error has occurred. Sometimes they do take action.

I am a successful FTCAer so I am familiar with FTCA case law.

They were hoping in my husband's case No one would ever find out what they did to him.

The VA does not give one hoot in hell about a claimant's rights when it comes to the FTCA Statute of Limits.

If a VA doctor feels something has gone wrong in VA care,they are supposed to report it and advise you of your 'rights'

As I mentioned sometimes they do that.If they don't it is up to the patient to do something-

"He owes me since he failed to let me know the options I had with botched surgery.(He was my PCP at the time.But also #2 man on hospital staff) He not only didn't tell me of options, he lied to me about everything. From what I have found about that time period, they not only were to notify me that I could file a tort claim, but were suppose to help me gather the info I" etc

They will NOT in probably about 98% of any case of a medical error -advise any veteran to file a FTCA claim.(or file an "Incident Report")

And they will definitely NOT help gather info to support it.

You could consider the Section 1151 info in the FTCA forum here at hadit.

No time limit for 1151 claims.

The basis is the same as for FTCA:

Documented proof of medical negligence, error or malpractice and

documented proof it cased additional disability or death.

“CERVICAL SPONDYLOSIS

DATE OF ONSET: 2001”

It seemed to me this was only disability the C & P doc said had it's onset during service.This was due to a fall inservice?

These pdfs were not easy for me to read.I guess the copies you have are very light.

“see if my early forced PCP will write a nexus letter on my AO part of my claim since that was one of his specialities “

Where were you exposed to AO and when?

Sorry if you already answered that her.I forgot what you said.

I was amazed how many OIG reports to Congress each year addressed what they were doing to inform patients what their rights were when they either died or was injured due to a medical practice error.It was one of their main talking points. And from what I have been seeing, it was nothing but talk. Say one thing to Congress and do the opposite to the Veteran. One would think that if rules were broken and laws were broken that the scale of justice weighs in favor of the veteran.In civilian life when a law is continuely broken, the statue of limitations don't st5art until they stop violating the defendant.Not the case with veterans. The C&P Dr answered the questions the way he wanted and not what I told him.Example he stated my teeth were fine.I had broken my dentures about 3 months earlier and I wasn't wearing any that day.How could they be fine? He said I had no hemmroids, yet he had a hard time missing them when he checked my prostrate gland. My knees are all scarred up from the Army, yet he said they were fine.lol He did say I used a cane.lol These are just a few of the things that were the opposite of what he wrote down.One wonders why he is doing C&P exams if he doesn't know what he is doing.lol Kinda like my SSD DR. He spent a total of 10 minutes with me and that was mainly eye test, weighing, height and about 2 minutes of actual exam.lol It was a joke. By the C&P drs exam it should have been a quick denial.So no idea what is taking them so long.lol Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NPRC must be monitoring this site.lol This morning I posted how the government always has a number to pertain to any action and that I got a response from them that had no number just typed out. Just a few minutes ago I got an email from them with the code 32 CFR 310.30(f) which is the code I was asking for. But now they are saying they never received my fax to them authorizing them to send info to new VA DR. The madness continues!! Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've attached the programs I was talking about on what they should have told me about.Since they are in the medical field and work within the VA system and are directed to handle things accordingly, it is up to them to inform me.How am I suppose to know what policy and procedure is? And I did ask what remedies I had and I was lied to by the #2 man on the hospital staff. Am I to assume that everyone in the medical field is going to lie to me? I'm sure the policies have changed many times over since these were adopted. But they were the policies at the time that the incident happened. Since that is all that I got at this time, (veldrina please turn head)lol, maybe I can razzle dazzle them with some of that cityfied lawrin' talk and get approved.lol I couldn't find my copy of the one time payment programs for errors inm medical procedures.Mike

VeteransClaimsAssistanceActof2000.pdf

8HI-A28-072MedicalAuditReports1998KeyEvidence.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Big Red

“NPRC must be monitoring this site.lol This morning I posted how the government always has a number to pertain to any action and that I got a response from them that had no number just typed out. Just a few minutes ago I got an email from them with the code 32 CFR 310.30(f) which is the code I was asking for.”

Back in 1996 to 1999 I was absolutely convinced “they” were reading my posts and changing the laws because of my claim. I berated the VA here on hadit for denying my claim without a C&P exam. I stated that they should re-adjudicate all claims that were denied without a C&P. Wouldn’t you know it, congress passed laws making such a requirement. It was part of the big switch between morton V, west and the Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000.

Hoppy

100% for Angioedema with secondary conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use