Jump to content
  • Donation Box

    Please donate to support the community.
    We appreciate all donations!
  • Advertisemnt

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

Sponsored Ads

  •  ad-free-subscription-002.jpeg     fund-the-site.jpg

  • Searches Community Forums, Blog and more

  • 0
RDT

Cue Medical Evidents

Question

I had a decision on a claim that went back to 2000.

The VA based there decision on 2 C&P from 2009 & 2010.

The medical records match from the year 2000 (LVL @ 48%) and the year 2011 (LVL @ 50%)

Should not there decision be based on the medical evidents in the year 2000 if they are making an award from the claim.

They awarded 100% based on the current year 2011 and only 10% for the retro year 2000. Seem wrong to me

Is there any reference on when they apply the evidents and would this be a CUE claim

Any help would be great

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Hi RDT,

Would like to help you but you haven't posted much for anyone to really understand.

Could you be a little more specific ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ad

I have attached the VA decision for review.

I would think that if you file a claim, it would be based on the medical evidents for that year. Nehmir Case.

Any help on how to proceed would be great.

I just think that the 48 % LVL in 2000,documented in there decision should rate 60% and not 10% . They based the 10% on a C&P from 2009 for the lease to pay out retro.

Thanks

Ray

Hadit.pdf

Hadit1.pdf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nod that decision right now. The Ejection fraction of 48 is a 60 percent issue as stated in the title 38 part 4.

That is what I call a lowball. You cannot cue it until you wait 1 year for the decision to be final.

Explain the regs to them very clearly and you will have no problem.

J

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have attached the VA decision for review.

I would think that if you file a claim, it would be based on the medical evidents for that year. Nehmir Case.

Any help on how to proceed would be great.

I just think that the 48 % LVL in 2000,documented in there decision should rate 60% and not 10% . They based the 10% on a C&P from 2009 for the lease to pay out retro.

Thanks

Ray

Hi RDT,,

From what I read it looks to me like you received a fair decision. Your METS level was just too high for you to receive more than a 10% rating. I had a 7.6 METS level and I was given the same thing, but they retroed it back to 2003.

I am no expert on this but there is an organization called NVLSP and they would take a look at your claim if you contact them and fill out their questionaire. They are good folks and very high powered lawyers. Maybe ask Berta or Carlie on this. I believe they do pro bono work for us vets (free of charge) so check them out.

Good Luck!

NSA-Saigon-ET

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is not a CUE scenario.

RDT-did you contact NVLSP when you filed this claim as suggested in our AO forum?

The decision might be correct but I suggest whether you had contact with them yet or not- contact NVLSP at their AO addy and ask them if they would review the decision.

agentorange@nvlsp.org

Yes-these are pro bono lawyers and they won the Beverly Nehmer AO court case.

You have a Footnote one Nehmer claim.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Ads

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Our picks

    • I filed for my mitral valve regurgitation heart disease secondary to a service-connected condition on 7-30-18. It was granted on 8-30-18. Since I filed for this heart valve issue and was awarded, can I still file for hypertension ? I have been seeing comments that you should file for hypertension first and file for heart disease as a secondary. Can I file for hypertension as a secondary to my heart disease ? I am alittle confused on this matter.

      Dan
    • How to Change the Theme - Look and Colors
      How to Change the Theme - Look and Colors
      • 5 replies
    • For Calculating Retro

      VA Disability Compensation Rates 2012 | 2011 | 2010-2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999

      Prior to 1999 check here https://www.hadit.com/va-disability-compensation-rates-historic-for-retro-calculation/
      • 0 replies
    • I am a 100% disabled veteran, At first I was super excited to find out I am getting retro pay for back benefits to 2006. But that was over 2 months ago. I been waiting and waiting and calling to ask them wheres my back pay. They first told me "one month" than I call again. The guy started reading a script of basically "we are malingering on paying you" type crap. I was wondering if there is any number I can call besides that 800-827-1000 number to inquire about my status. I don't know why its taken so long when there is specific information telling them from the judge that VA owes. 

      There was a remanded to see if I was eligible for IU (I get it now since 2014 im actually 90% with 10 of that been IU). I been on SS since 2004. Can Someone help me out? Thank you
      • 6 replies
    • You might have a 38 CFR 3.156 situation-

      meaning the VA might have considered your claim in 95/96 as "not well grounded" and failed to even get your STRs.Or they did get your STRs but never considered the specific entry you cited here.

      Lots of discussion under a search, of 38 CFR. 3.156 (a)(b) (c) ---here is a winner:

      https://community.hadit.com/topic/52994-cue-in-failing-to-apply-the-provisions-of-38-cfr-§-3156c-for-effective-date/

      o

       
        • Thanks
×

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines