Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Veteran Service Officer Just Quit

Rate this question


Getting Old

Question

I just called in to the office to check on my claim and add more information to it and found out that the officer in charge of my claim quit about a month ago. unfortanetly she was the best in the office. the person that is there now is in training and im not sure if i want someone in training dealing with my claim. so what is my next step? can i do this all on my own? thank you in advance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 18
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Without treatment records from the time you separated from service to the present, there is nothing to show "chronicity". Apparently, the Service Medical Record showed a one-time event and you recovered with no problems, particularly since X-rays at that time were negative.

It's like the troop who had a knee strain in service and applied for service connection over Ten Years After (great group BTW). While he claimed that the knee strain had devastated his life (really, he did!), there were absolutely no following treatment records for any knee condition, that is, until he had an work-related accident at his work place and heavy boxes fell on him - five years after separation.

I have poof of it happening while i was in the army. And we submitted a claim back in 2010 and they denied my claim. Here in the article. Then we appealed the claim as soon as they denied it.As of today i am about to go for pyshical therapy because its getting to bed where i can sleep at night and/or move around threw out the day.And im only 30. Thanks for your help.

Service connection for lumbar degenerative disc disease claimed as lower back.

Your service treatment records noted an injury to your back in service. X-rays of the spine were taken on October 7, 2002 after you complained of tenderness over the T10 T12 after trauma. The x-ray was normal. Your separation examination noted a "normal" spine and there were not complaints voiced by you at the time concerning your back and/or spine.

At the recent VA examination conducted on February 1, 2011 you complained of pain stiffness, weakness, and fatigability. You stated that you had an injury to back in the service when he went to stand in a tank and the tray where ammunition is loaded hit you in your back. You stated that you had mild problems afterwards, but notice more problems when you worked for the prison system from March 2009 to August 2010. You noted that with prolonged standing for a few hours as well as with sitting while driving for a few hours, you would feel low back pain. Lying down will help this. You saw a private provider and was scheduled to get therapy before trying back injections. You have numbness in the right leg to the foot that would occur with the back pain flare ups but currently you denied any numbness. You also start limping during a flare-up. The pain is located across the lumbosacral area and does not radiate. You are able to walk normally without any assistive device. This condition has no effect on your usual occupation. You are able to perform all activities of daily living. Range of motion of the lumbar spine: forward flexion: 0 to 90 degrees without objective evidence of pain; extension: 0- 30 degrees without evidence of pain; right lateral flexion: 0-30 without objective evidence of pain; left lateral rotation: 0-30 degrees without objective evidence of pain. There was no additional limitation of motion following 3 repetitions. The examiner stated that on exam today, there was no objective evidence of painful motion, spasm, weakness, or tenderness. You denied any incapacitating episodes in the past 12 month period. Strength was 5/5 in all muscle groups of the upper and lower extremities. Straight leg raise negative bilaterally,. Sensation to light touch was intact in the upper and lower extremities. DTR's: 2+ bilaterally, babinski negative. MRI of the lumbar spine dated June 29, 2010 noted mild bulging of the annulus at L4/L5 may abut but does not displace the exiting right L4 nerve root. The diagnosis provided by the examiner is lumbar degenerative disc disease. The examiner opined that this condition is less likely as not caused by or related to veterans service. There was no evidence found of periodic treatment for low back condition continuing from service. No low back condition was noted on exit exam from the service.

A disability which began in service or was caused by some event in service must be considered "chronic" before service connection can be granted. Although there is a record of treatment in service for pes cavus claimed as right foot condition, no permanent residual or chronic disability subject to service connection is shown by the service medical records or demonstrated by evidence following service. Therefore, service connection for lumbar degenerative disc disease claimed as lower back is denied.

Interested

causalobserver8@aol.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderator

Getting Old Posted: My comments are underlined:

The x-ray was normal.

Xrays dont show everything, for example, they dont show damage to tissues, only things like fractures.

Your separation examination noted a "normal" spine and there were not complaints voiced by you at the time concerning your back and/or spine.....

....... Lying down will help this.

What? This is the rating specialist telling you that "lying down will help this"? Makes no sense and suggest rating specialist is recommending treatment. This is very close to CUE. Rating specialists can not substitute their own unsubstantiated medical opinion for that of a qualifed medical professional. I would "nail" them on this.

You saw a private provider and was scheduled to get therapy before trying back injections. You have numbness in the right leg to the foot that would occur with the back pain flare ups but currently you denied any numbness.

Contradiction. This is a very very bad decision. You also start limping during a flare-up. The pain is located across the lumbosacral area and does not radiate. You are able to walk normally without any assistive device. This condition has no effect on your usual occupation. You are able to perform all activities of daily living. Range of motion of the lumbar spine: forward flexion: 0 to 90 degrees without objective evidence of pain; extension: 0- 30 degrees without evidence of pain; right lateral flexion: 0-30 without objective evidence of pain; left lateral rotation: 0-30 degrees without objective evidence of pain. There was no additional limitation of motion following 3 repetitions.

Who says? The rating specialist or the examiner? Again, the rating specialist can not insert his unsubstantianed medical opinion. The examiner stated that on exam today, there was no objective evidence of painful motion, spasm, weakness, or tenderness. You denied any incapacitating episodes in the past 12 month period. Strength was 5/5 in all muscle groups of the upper and lower extremities. Straight leg raise negative bilaterally,. Sensation to light touch was intact in the upper and lower extremities. DTR's: 2+ bilaterally, babinski negative. MRI of the lumbar spine dated June 29, 2010 noted mild bulging of the annulus at L4/L5 may abut but does not displace the exiting right L4 nerve root. The diagnosis provided by the examiner is lumbar degenerative disc disease. The examiner opined Now we are talking. The examiner can opine, but the rating specialists medical opinion on your health is irrelevant. that this condition is less likely as not caused by or related to veterans service. You need to read the C and P exam..this looks like an obfuscation of the facts if the examiner said your condition was "at least as likely as not due to military service". The rating specialist "twisted" what the examiner said and made it sound like it was "less likely". There was no evidence found of periodic treatment more obfuscation. There needs to be chronicity of symptoms, not chronicity of treatment. You see, the doc can change the treatment, try different drugs, different therapies, etc. But you still have chronic symptoms. for low back condition continuing from service. No low back condition was noted on exit exam from the service.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well guys i just went to the chiropractor today and tomorrow i will find out the results from the xrays. And i will make sure i post them on here for your help.

And as for that last two post im comfused on if i have a good claim or not.The day i went to the c&p exam my back didnt feel that bad, I had pain pills.

Also i might add the examiner didnt put alot of the things that i was telling her into this report.To me it seems alittle more on her side, but from now on I know to not to take my meds...

And as for the reason i didnt get the injections in my back is because my DR pasted away in a fire a few days after my meeting with him.

What is the difference between symptoms and treatment?

Thanks Mark

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderator

Symptoms: Example Back pain.

Treatment: Example: Doctor may treat with Ibuprofin, or Doctor may perform surgery.

When they speak of a "chronic" condition, this means that it has had symptoms for a longer period of time, as opposed to an "acute" condition. An "acute" condition may be like a backache that hurts for 4 days, and then gets better.

If you have chronic back aches, for example, you may or may not seek treatment for them. You may take over the counter pain medication for treatment, for example.

It is not always necessary to go to the doc to treat your back ache every 2 weeks for 10 years to show you had chronic back pain.

The difference is maybe you broke your foot in the military. Sure it hurt for 2 weeks then got better. If it is not hurting now, and you dont have any problems with it, you wont be compensated.

However, if that broken foot causes you arthritis, and did not heal right, and you continued to suffer with pain over the past 10 years, then this is a chronic condition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have been very helpful and this just cleared up a lot of the questions that I have had.

When we appealed their decision we stated how I have had the back pain ever since the army, but I just delt with the pain because i didnt have insurance. But as you see when I had a job that offered insurance I made sure I went to the doctor for my back. All the way up to this point. It wasnt worded exactly like that but very close.

Thank you

Symptoms: Example Back pain.

Treatment: Example: Doctor may treat with Ibuprofin, or Doctor may perform surgery.

When they speak of a "chronic" condition, this means that it has had symptoms for a longer period of time, as opposed to an "acute" condition. An "acute" condition may be like a backache that hurts for 4 days, and then gets better.

If you have chronic back aches, for example, you may or may not seek treatment for them. You may take over the counter pain medication for treatment, for example.

It is not always necessary to go to the doc to treat your back ache every 2 weeks for 10 years to show you had chronic back pain.

The difference is maybe you broke your foot in the military. Sure it hurt for 2 weeks then got better. If it is not hurting now, and you dont have any problems with it, you wont be compensated.

However, if that broken foot causes you arthritis, and did not heal right, and you continued to suffer with pain over the past 10 years, then this is a chronic condition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Symptoms: Example Back pain.

Treatment: Example: Doctor may treat with Ibuprofin, or Doctor may perform surgery.

When they speak of a "chronic" condition, this means that it has had symptoms for a longer period of time, as opposed to an "acute" condition. An "acute" condition may be like a backache that hurts for 4 days, and then gets better.

If you have chronic back aches, for example, you may or may not seek treatment for them. You may take over the counter pain medication for treatment, for example.

It is not always necessary to go to the doc to treat your back ache every 2 weeks for 10 years to show you had chronic back pain.

The difference is maybe you broke your foot in the military. Sure it hurt for 2 weeks then got better. If it is not hurting now, and you dont have any problems with it, you wont be compensated.

However, if that broken foot causes you arthritis, and did not heal right, and you continued to suffer with pain over the past 10 years, then this is a chronic condition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use