Jump to content
  • Advertisemnt

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Donation Box

    Please donate to support the community.
    We appreciate all donations!
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

Sponsored Ads

  • Searches Community Forums, Blog and more

  • 0
carlie

Arneson V. Shinsek

Question

I wonder if this memorandum can be applied to BVA board (panel)

decisions that were adjudicated in the past ?

Any takers ?

From vetlawyers / Bergmann & Moore

http://www.vetlawyers.com/newsletters/may2011Newsletter.pdf

Page 5

Arneson v. Shinsek

" CAVC HOLDS THAT CLAIMANTS HAVE A

RIGHT TO A PERSONAL HEARING BEFORE

ALL BOARD MEMBERS WHO ULTIMATELY

DECIDE THE APPEAL"

" This decision is about fairness,” said Glenn Bergmann, Mr.

Arneson’s attorney. “We knew that once the judges

looked at the process, they would make the right decision.

We are happy to have played a role in it.” As a result of this

decision, the Chairman of the Board of Veterans Appeals

issued a memorandum on May 12 2011."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

The Court thus held that “the pertinent statutes and

implementing regulation regarding Board hearings entitle a

claimant to an opportunity for a hearing before all the Board

members who will ultimately decide his appeal”

I guess they figure to show a little heart before they deny it for the last time! ha

Coot

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ad

Arneson vs Shinseki is a panel CAVC decision so it is precedential and binding upon the BVA. The question is whether its binding retroactively, (in the past). CUE errors only apply to the laws at the time of the decision so if it is CUE you are seeking, it appears Arneson wont help you.

However, it would appear this is about an interpretation of the law, so the "effective date" of the interpretion may be up for grabs. Remember, under the old laws, claims had to be "well grounded". After that was dropped, the VA could never again deny a claim because it was not "well grounded".

I dont know what would happen if you had a claim denied because it was "not well grounded" and try to "CUE" it on that basis today. You might be able to find that and my guess would be that it would apply to this case, also.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With all that I posted below, there is another regulation about "liberalizing" laws. A "liberalizing" law means that they used to deny them on this, but the law changed so they cant deny it on that basis anymore. I think the Veteran gets the more favorable version applied.

If that is the case, then Arneson may help you after all. However, if this is an unappealed decision (ie. Cue) then I dont know which would apply...the "liberalizing" law, or the strict interpretation of CUE.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

bronco,

I have no idea why you are bringing in issues like claims for CUE.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I brought up the issue of CUE because you asked,

"I wonder if this memorandum can be applied to BVA board (panel)

decisions that were adjudicated in the past ?"

...You did not mention if the "Board Decision" that was adjudicated in the past was timely appealed or not. If it was timely appealed, then, it does not appear that CUE would apply. However, decisions not timely appealed, as well as some EED appeals, fall under the stricter CUE standards.

Arneson appears to establish a precedent...that is, that claimants have a right to a personal hearing from all board members. Therefore, if the VA fails to give claimants a right to a personel hearing, then that would be a legal error. I dont know if this "legal error" of failing to give claimans the right to a personal hearing would rise to the Cue level or not, but if the claimant could establish that the VA improperly denied them the right to a hearing, then one could argue that this legal error rises to CUE criteria, since the VA is not free to ignore its own regulations. They must follow the laws, and if they dont, the Veteran can argue this is CUE. Of course, the Cue error would need to be outcome determinative, and be based on the laws at that time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ads

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Our picks

    • Military Service Records - Military personnel records can include DD 214s/Separation Documents, service personnel records found within the Official Military Personnel File (OMPF), and medical Records. Military personnel records can be used for proving military service or as a valuable tool in genealogical research.
      • 0 replies
    • So I've been in a basic power chair (Q6 Edge) since 2015. Late 2016 was also fitted for a TiLite TRA manual (also keeping powerchair). 2017 was approved by Tampa VA for clothing allowance for lower. 

       

      Moved to Battle Creek VA late 2017. Since then was issued new basic powerchair (Quickie P222-SE) to replace broken Q6. Still use TiLite also now can lightly ambulate with Forearm crutches.

      Use crutches 50%, and both chairs 25% each.

      Was approved for 1 clothing allowance this year for forearms crutches for upper.

       

      Was denied 2nd for chair/lower that was awarded last year because Chief Prosthetic states "powerchair takes precedence, you were issued that so you are to use only the powerchair".

      Also powerchair has gap between seat and leg mounts where clothes do get caught and tear. Clinician was I'll put it back in but"power chairs dont get clothing allowances", and "any review or appeal will only come back to me"

      I was approved for powerchair/custom manual combo clothing allowance last year; How do I word an appeal for the lower clothing allowance this year?

      My local DAV rep at the VA has no clue on how to handle this.

       
      • 6 replies
    • Thank you.  I’m not exactly sure of how I will file it.  If it is secondary to TBI, would it be pyramiding?
    • I understand what you are saying. Does it sometimes take awhile to update the VA letters and disabilities info online after it closes.....in my case on a Saturday ? Some on other posts on here says no and some say yes so I'm just curious about the inconsistency regarding that if it is yes and no.
    • I understand what you are saying. Does it sometimes take awhile to update the VA letters and disabilities info online after it closes.....in my case on a Saturday ? Some on other posts on here says no and some say yes so I'm just curious about the inconsistency regarding that if it is yes and no.
×

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines