Filing aorta aneurysm as secondary claim to my service connected disability valvular heart disease
US Army 1972-1975, I am currently 60% disabled with a history of service connected valvular heart disease. DX before leaving the service, (Aorta Stenosis, bicuspid aorta valve). My disability is not IHD or connected to AO, but still ;
Service Connected, Peacetime, Incurred
10% from 10/16/1975
100% from 02/13/2007
60% from 09/01/2008
The aorta valve had to be replaced in 2007, In 2010 I started having some familiar symptoms, testing was done the MRI showed an aorta aneurysm 5cm x 4.6cm, 8 months later a CT showed aorta aneurysm 4.9cm x 4.8cm. In the CFR 38 - 4.104 - 7110, an aneurysm is compensability when it reaches 5cm.
Doctor/Radiology progress report states: likely part of the spectrum of by bicuspid valve and aortopathy.
Fellow veterans have told me that this does not say what the relationship is between the aneurysm and the service connected valvular heart disease.
In a non related C&P exam, which was to be for this purpose, but the claim was wrote up wrong, the examiner did comment on the aorta aneurysm, he stated in his DIAGNOSES,(quote) “ 1. Aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis. 2. Aneurysm of the thoracic aorta. This is most likely related to the aortic stenosis.” IS this going to be sufficient evidence in connecting the two diseases together? Or is a Nexus Letter still going to be needed? I am having a hard time finding someone to write a nexus letter. Thanks of all comments regarding this issue.
Question
Spiderman
Filing aorta aneurysm as secondary claim to my service connected disability valvular heart disease
US Army 1972-1975, I am currently 60% disabled with a history of service connected valvular heart disease. DX before leaving the service, (Aorta Stenosis, bicuspid aorta valve). My disability is not IHD or connected to AO, but still ;
Service Connected, Peacetime, Incurred
10% from 10/16/1975
100% from 02/13/2007
60% from 09/01/2008
The aorta valve had to be replaced in 2007, In 2010 I started having some familiar symptoms, testing was done the MRI showed an aorta aneurysm 5cm x 4.6cm, 8 months later a CT showed aorta aneurysm 4.9cm x 4.8cm. In the CFR 38 - 4.104 - 7110, an aneurysm is compensability when it reaches 5cm.
Doctor/Radiology progress report states: likely part of the spectrum of by bicuspid valve and aortopathy.
Fellow veterans have told me that this does not say what the relationship is between the aneurysm and the service connected valvular heart disease.
In a non related C&P exam, which was to be for this purpose, but the claim was wrote up wrong, the examiner did comment on the aorta aneurysm, he stated in his DIAGNOSES,(quote) “ 1. Aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis. 2. Aneurysm of the thoracic aorta. This is most likely related to the aortic stenosis.” IS this going to be sufficient evidence in connecting the two diseases together? Or is a Nexus Letter still going to be needed? I am having a hard time finding someone to write a nexus letter. Thanks of all comments regarding this issue.
Spiderman
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
2
1
1
1
Popular Days
Mar 12
4
Sep 19
1
Top Posters For This Question
Spiderman 2 posts
Philip Rogers 1 post
jbasser 1 post
treysnonna 1 post
Popular Days
Mar 12 2012
4 posts
Sep 19 2017
1 post
4 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now