Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

An Interesting Resource For Toxins

Rate this question


free_spirit_etc

Question

The toxicology unit from

United States Naval Flight Surgeon Handbook: 2nd Edition 1998

http://www.medicalcorps.org/manuals/flight...ook/9toxic.html

Toxicologic evaluation involves several concepts which must be defined. Risk denotes the probability (expected frequency) that a chemical will produce undesirable effects under specified conditions. NEL (no effect level) is the maximum dose that has not induced any sign of toxicity in the most susceptible species of animals tested and using the most sensitive indicator of toxicity (not applied to carcinogens). There is no threshold defined for carcinogens because cancer cells can be induced by a single change in the cellular genetic material and they are self-replicating. The dose-response relationship is graphically displayed by plotting the frequency of an event vs. the dose on a log scale, which results in a sigmoid-shaped curve. The portion of this curve between 16-84% response is nearly linear and represents one standard deviation each direction from the mean.

The LD50 is also utilized to classify the toxicity of substances, as demonstrated in the following:

Category

LD50

Supertoxic

5mg/kg

Extremely toxic

5-50 mg/kg

Highly toxic

50-500 mg/kg

Moderately toxic

0.5-5 g/kg

Slightly toxic

5-15 g/kg

Practically non-toxic

15 g/kg

Duration and frequency of exposure are also important parameters:

acute exposure - an exposure of 24 hours or less.

subacute exposure - repeated exposure over one month.

subchronic exposure - exposure occurring over 1-3 months.

chronic exposure - over 3 months

Asbestos

Chemical nature -- a generic term for naturally occurring fibrous minerals. The fibers are made up of fibrils which are not visible to the optical microscope, but are to the electron microscope.

Method of absorption -- serious toxicity is from inhalation. Visible fibers break into fibrils in the lung.

Associated clinical syndrome -- Three major distinct syndromes: (1) Asbestosis, (2) Lung cancer, and (3) Mesothelioma. Asbestosis is diffuse interstitial fibrosis with a small tight lung. This is due to massive exposure to the airborne fibers. This is the most common disease state associated with exposure. Lung cancer is the most common cause of death, however. This is induced by imbedded fibrils in the lung. Asbestos workers have ten times the lung cancer death rate of non-asbestos workers from lung cancer, all other things being equal. Smokers add a multiplier of eight to this. Mesothelioma was previously extremely rare and has increased to fairly common in asbestos workers. This is what is called a signal neoplasm in preventive medicine. Pulmonary plaques are also to be found after exposure. Although they are not associated directly with illness, they are yet another indicator of the reactivity of lung tissue with asbestos exposure.

Association with USN -- previously ships were full of asbestos, however, new ships have very little. Ripout and breakup of old ships is quite hazardous.

A very common mineral fiber. Detailed safety procedures are necessary when working with asbestos. Latency of disease make cause and effect difficult to measure.

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

0 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

There have been no answers to this question yet

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use