Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Rate this question


HorizontalMike

Question

QUESTION: How can I be absolutely sure I get a copy of my COMPLETE medical records from 1972-1975?

2013, I requested and actually DID receive SOME medical records (I did not know they were incomplete) from NPRC.

2014, I requested(*see attached) medical records from 1972-end of 1975, and got this response from the NPRC:

"ORIGINAL MEDICAL RECORD NEEDED TO ANSWER YOUR INQUIRY IS NOT IN YOUR FILES; THAT MEDICAL RECORD IS WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS (VA)"

Attached are the TWO NPRC responses to the TWO medical requests that were just under one year apart. In one case I received information, and in the most recent case I was told it does NOT exist at NPRC. Please understand that my mind is racing with "WTF!", anger, puzzlement, etc. Understanding that the records I am requesting are over 40yr old and existed with the NPRC last year, how can they now be "missing"?

FWIW, my disability rating came in Dec 2013 (for a 1972 TBI) and the examiners had way more medical records information in front of them on their PCs than I had ever received after my 2013 request for that SAME information. Some of that EXTRA medical records that I did NOT receive, but the examiners had and used, actually DID help me in receiving my 50% rating, BUT I am lost, feeling that the records that have been kept from me, could and probably do, indicate I should have a much higher rating than what was awarded.

I am about ready to launch a letter writing campaign including several Congressmen, the VA Secretary, and others. Is THAT my next step?

post-17135-0-67018400-1408800896_thumb.j

post-17135-0-21973900-1408800937_thumb.j

Edited by HorizontalMike
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

A VA claim needs 3 things:

1. a diagnosis or symptoms of an issue in service

2. a current diagnosis. This can come from your VA doc, the VA C&P exam or from a private physician.

3. a nexus statement showing the link to service

Did you already file an appeal or a reconsideration with new and material evidence?

Regarding the depression denial, I think it is fairly straightforward how to get it approved. The depression was denied due to no nexus statement-the statement tying your depression to service. At the C&P exam, the examiner did not give you the nexus statement. You can try again with a new VA C&P exam, but the best thing to do is get a IMO/IME done by a doc familiar with VA protocols. In their letter, they will need to directly rebut the previous doctors statements, especially the one about the incorrect dates of 2010 depression onset.

Doctor Valette may be able to do it. http://www.shrink911.net/services.htm

If not, any qualified psychologist or psychiatrist...

They should also fill out the DBQ for depression.

Reading the denial for depression, under Item #4, paragraph 2, they did not consider it as "secondary to TBI". They evaluated it as a direct service connection. Which is fine. A direct service connection or a secondary service connection both workout the same, just different evidence is needed, depending which way you are seeking the service connection. The letter states you had symptoms of depression in 1973 during service. That satisfies part 1. It sounds like you have a current diagnosis of depression. That satisfies part 2. But part 3, the nexus statement was not given.

Have you bought the Veterans Benefit Manual yet? I think it would give you a lot of insight into this process. http://www.lexisnexis.com/store/catalog/booktemplate/productdetail.jsp?pageName=relatedProducts&prodId=12734

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

The new TBI presumptive rules are nice and will benefit a few vets, but the rules are so narrow, many will not be able to use it. For the depression to be presumptive to TBI, the depression has to be actually diagnosed within 1 year of a mild TBI or within 3 years of a moderate or severe TBI. No diagnosis during that timeframe, then no presumption. The only thing the presumption does is alleviate the need for the nexus statement. So unless you had a actual diagnosis of depression during those timeframes, you still need the nexus statement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Did you already file an appeal or a reconsideration with new and material evidence?

Yes, this past March. At the time I did not have the above "initial psych eval" Progress Notes (post #13). Those came within a week after I submitted the Appeal. Now that I have that, do you think that that initial evaluation would provide that nexus?

Regarding the depression denial, I think it is fairly straightforward how to get it approved. The depression was denied due to no nexus statement-the statement tying your depression to service. At the C&P exam, the examiner did not give you the nexus statement. You can try again with a new VA C&P exam, but the best thing to do is get a IMO/IME done by a doc familiar with VA protocols. In their letter, they will need to directly rebut the previous doctors statements, especially the one about the incorrect dates of 2010 depression onset.

  • Regarding the IMO, should I seek a neuro-psychologist, neuro-psychiatrist, or a run of the mill psychologist or psychiatrist?
  • Should I probably seek more than one IMO/IME?... One for the nexus and one for current disability (remember "increase" of TBI + "initial rating" of depression)

They should also fill out the DBQ for depression.

Got it. Will do.

Reading the denial for depression, under Item #4, paragraph 2, they did not consider it as "secondary to TBI". They evaluated it as a direct service connection. Which is fine. A direct service connection or a secondary service connection both workout the same, just different evidence is needed, depending which way you are seeking the service connection. The letter states you had symptoms of depression in 1973 during service. That satisfies part 1. It sounds like you have a current diagnosis of depression. That satisfies part 2. But part 3, the nexus statement was not given.

Will work on clearing up the nexus. I am thinking the my initial psych consult (in post#13) will/should go a long ways in helping establish nexus since it shows continual use of depression medication (for about +20yr at this point), but understand the need for IMO.

Have you bought the Veterans Benefit Manual yet? I think it would give you a lot of insight into this process. http://www.lexisnexis.com/store/catalog/booktemplate/productdetail.jsp?pageName=relatedProducts&prodId=12734

I will put this on my wish list, though as many hours/days that I am on VA.gov I have found much of what is in the table of contents. In another month or so will have the $$$.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

No, that letter will not be enough for a nexus statement. Here's a link explaining more about the nexus statment.

http://www.benefits....stBySymptom.asp

---Refer to the VA rating guidelines

http://www.vetsforju...n’s Guide.htm

or

http://www.americanb...uthcheckdam.pdf

Each DBQ must include multiple parts:

1). Diagnosis

2) Statement that Dr. reviewed the pertinent medical records or check the applicable box if available.

3) Nexus Statement from Dr. that says "condition X is at least as likely as not due to condition Y".

4) Rationale Statement from Dr. explaining how he came to his conclusion on the Nexus. Must give specific reasons why one condition caused or aggravated the other.

5) Statement from Dr. regarding his medical degree and qualifications, his CV

On most DBQ forms only #1 and #2 are part of the form. You must have your Dr. write in #3, #4 & #5 if they are not part of the form. I'm NOT saying a DBQ without each of these 5 Items can't be approved. I'm saying these are 5 of the things that if any of them ARE missing, VA has used as an excuse to deny a claim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

No, that letter will not be enough for a nexus statement. Here's a link explaining more about the nexus statment.

http://www.benefits....stBySymptom.asp

---Refer to the VA rating guidelines

http://www.vetsforju...n’s Guide.htm

or

http://www.americanb...uthcheckdam.pdf

Each DBQ must include multiple parts:

1). Diagnosis

2) Statement that Dr. reviewed the pertinent medical records or check the applicable box if available.

3) Nexus Statement from Dr. that says "condition X is at least as likely as not due to condition Y".

4) Rationale Statement from Dr. explaining how he came to his conclusion on the Nexus. Must give specific reasons why one condition caused or aggravated the other.

5) Statement from Dr. regarding his medical degree and qualifications, his CV

On most DBQ forms only #1 and #2 are part of the form. You must have your Dr. write in #3, #4 & #5 if they are not part of the form. I'm NOT saying a DBQ without each of these 5 Items can't be approved. I'm saying these are 5 of the things that if any of them ARE missing, VA has used as an excuse to deny a claim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Sorry about the broken links. I copy and pasted them and it didn't carry over. See if these work.

http://www.benefits.va.gov/COMPENSATION/dbq_ListBySymptom.asp DBQ list

http://www.benefits.va.gov/compensation/dbq_disabilityexams.asp info on DBQ's

http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?rgn=div5;node=38:1.0.1.1.5 rating guidelines

more TBI info, including link to TBI clinicians guide.

http://www.hadit.com/forums/forum/79-tbi-traumatic-brain-injury/ TBI section of hadit, in case you havent already read it

 

At this stage, your claim has been denied for depression, so another option is to seek out a veteran claims disability lawyer. They do not charge anything upfront and usually take 20% of the backpay. They can help you get these IMEs as well as focus your correspondence to VA on the issues that need the focus. Chris Attig is one that posts occasionally here on hadit. http://www.attiglawfirm.com/about-the-firm/about-chris-attig/

---might be worth having a conversation with him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use