If you had a bone fracture, in service, you should read this "unofficial" interpretation of VA new policy:
The fact that the examiner cites proper healing of the fractures should have no bearing on whether service connection is granted for the fracture or not, as fractures are a chronic condition which are subject to service connection per the recent guidance put out in the April 2014 Veterans Service Center Manager (VSCM) Call Bulletin (don't bother looking for it, you won't be able to find or access it). However, given that the examiner cites the current disability is due to pes planus (which I assume is not service connected) it's likely you could be granted s/c at 0% for the historical fracture and denied pes planus and the residuals. The fact that you had fractures could certainly help your case on appeal if you were to assert that your pes planus was a result of the fractures sustained in service. Wait and see what happens... I'd fight this one tooth and nail, especially if there is no evidence of intercurrent injury... It seems pretty plausible that fractures, especially of the talus and cuneiform, could result in arch abnormality.
end quote from "other" website.
Notice here what is going on. The VA is putting out "VSCM call bulletin's", to which we have no access. Is this a "secret handshake". I have particular dislke when govenment agencies spend taxpayer money in "secret". I would also like to know what ELSE VA is hiding from us. This informal interpretation from someone allegedly in the know at VA who chooses to remain anonomyous is a glimmer of light. Of course, we were not supposed to get this information, and that is why I reposted it.
Remember, Shinseki got fired over "secret waiting lists", that hurt Vets. So, now there are "secret regulatory guidelenes" which are carefully guarded from Veterans.
Question
broncovet
If you had a bone fracture, in service, you should read this "unofficial" interpretation of VA new policy:
The fact that the examiner cites proper healing of the fractures should have no bearing on whether service connection is granted for the fracture or not, as fractures are a chronic condition which are subject to service connection per the recent guidance put out in the April 2014 Veterans Service Center Manager (VSCM) Call Bulletin (don't bother looking for it, you won't be able to find or access it). However, given that the examiner cites the current disability is due to pes planus (which I assume is not service connected) it's likely you could be granted s/c at 0% for the historical fracture and denied pes planus and the residuals. The fact that you had fractures could certainly help your case on appeal if you were to assert that your pes planus was a result of the fractures sustained in service. Wait and see what happens... I'd fight this one tooth and nail, especially if there is no evidence of intercurrent injury... It seems pretty plausible that fractures, especially of the talus and cuneiform, could result in arch abnormality.
end quote from "other" website.
Notice here what is going on. The VA is putting out "VSCM call bulletin's", to which we have no access. Is this a "secret handshake". I have particular dislke when govenment agencies spend taxpayer money in "secret". I would also like to know what ELSE VA is hiding from us. This informal interpretation from someone allegedly in the know at VA who chooses to remain anonomyous is a glimmer of light. Of course, we were not supposed to get this information, and that is why I reposted it.
Remember, Shinseki got fired over "secret waiting lists", that hurt Vets. So, now there are "secret regulatory guidelenes" which are carefully guarded from Veterans.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
9
6
2
1
Popular Days
Jan 17
11
Jan 18
3
Mar 20
3
Mar 21
1
Top Posters For This Question
Navy4life 9 posts
broncovet 6 posts
gs106 2 posts
HorizontalMike 1 post
Popular Days
Jan 17 2016
11 posts
Jan 18 2016
3 posts
Mar 20 2016
3 posts
Mar 21 2016
1 post
Popular Posts
broncovet
If you had a bone fracture, in service, you should read this "unofficial" interpretation of VA new policy: The fact that the examiner cites proper healing of the fractures should have no bearing
HorizontalMike
IMO, snail mail with "better" copies, is a better alternative. I would ALSO add "Signature Required" to the certified return receipt package. The goal here is to ELIMINATE any and all possibilities
broncovet
With all due respect, Navy, No. Anyone can own a fax machine, but a receipt stamped by the post office (certified mail signed by person receiving the mail) is credible evidence the VA received your e
Posted Images
18 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now