AgentOrangeWife Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 (edited) Hello, FIrst time post: Can anyone tell me if a rating reduction (from 100 to 60% for a service-connected disability) done without a reexamination is a CUE or a NOD? Less than 5-years rated. Here is a BVA case which parallels my husbands exact situation (citation 1428283). Thanks for this really helpful website!! A/O Wife Edited March 13, 2017 by AgentOrangeWife Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 HadIt.com Elder MikeR Posted April 11, 2017 HadIt.com Elder Share Posted April 11, 2017 It looks like one person wrote it, and another commented. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 AgentOrangeWife Posted April 11, 2017 Author Share Posted April 11, 2017 16 minutes ago, Berta said: "He did have an IME dated Nov 2016 which is included in the 2 evidence items as my "statement" dated Nov 2016. IME said "deteriorated" with open order for stent/angio etc." I will upload this in a bit. Yes, they called it "treatment notes". Yep, the open orders for angio/stent are called "treatment notes". When did he last have an ECHO? After the Jan 2017 MI. Do you have a copy of it's results or at least the ejection fraction and date of that ECHO? 35-40 after the Jan 2017 MI. After lengthy therapy, he had an EF of 55% in Dec 2016. === Here are some earlier uploads: apply for heart increase.pdf 10to100to60 decision letter.pdf Medical Opinion.docx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 AgentOrangeWife Posted April 11, 2017 Author Share Posted April 11, 2017 6 minutes ago, MikeR said: It looks like one person wrote it, and another commented. OMG there are 2 of them in cahoots on this?! No signature etc etc - not a very probative addendum (in my humble opinion). I'm almost certain that this would get tossed if a reasonable mind had to consider it as legal evidence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 HadIt.com Elder MikeR Posted April 11, 2017 HadIt.com Elder Share Posted April 11, 2017 Had to be, but it may be that one was reviewing the work of the other less senior person. Perhaps a QA reviewer. Happens all the time in Government. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Berta Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 I think you misunderstood what I meant by IME- An IME (Independent Medial Exam or evaluation) follows the criteria for IMOs/IMEs at hadit and is performed by a Non VA doctor with expertise in the field of disability. What you attached is not an IME.So no potential CUE basis there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 AgentOrangeWife Posted April 11, 2017 Author Share Posted April 11, 2017 (edited) 1 hour ago, Berta said: I think you misunderstood what I meant by IME- An IME (Independent Medial Exam or evaluation) follows the criteria for IMOs/IMEs at hadit and is performed by a Non VA doctor with expertise in the field of disability. I searched hadit for "IME criteria" and came up with 134 hits so I'm attaching the exam/treatment notes with medical orders from the private doctor who is a known expert witness, has 8 years history with veteran, directs the local cath lab: exam with medical orders.pdf ===== What you attached is not an IME.So no potential CUE basis there. What about here: Is this a proper form and verbage for a cue..pdf Edited April 11, 2017 by AgentOrangeWife Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Question
AgentOrangeWife
Hello,
FIrst time post:
Can anyone tell me if a rating reduction (from 100 to 60% for a service-connected disability) done without a reexamination is a CUE or a NOD? Less than 5-years rated. Here is a BVA case which parallels my husbands exact situation (citation 1428283).
Thanks for this really helpful website!!
A/O Wife
Edited by AgentOrangeWifeLink to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
21
14
7
6
Popular Days
Apr 11
18
Mar 14
8
Apr 10
8
Mar 15
6
Top Posters For This Question
AgentOrangeWife 21 posts
Berta 14 posts
Gastone 7 posts
MikeR 6 posts
Popular Days
Apr 11 2017
18 posts
Mar 14 2017
8 posts
Apr 10 2017
8 posts
Mar 15 2017
6 posts
Popular Posts
FormerMember
<<<Don't let filing Appeals interfere with filing additional SC Claims, big costly mistake.>>> Yes and no. If your claim(s) have been certified and a VA 8 issued, then what Gast
FormerMember
Berta and I need to take a class in prescience. For the record, if you got a 10>100<60% in one rating, what you have is an increase from 10 to 100 as a temporary rating and then 60 as a permanen
MikeR
I had a claim that sat at the BVA for 5 years, only to be denied by what looked like an barely literate person. It was a comical read, except it had my name on it.
50 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now