Jump to content
  • Donation Box

    Please donate to support the community.
    We appreciate all donations!
  • Advertisemnt

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

Sponsored Ads

  •  ad-free-subscription-002.jpeg     fund-the-site.jpg

  • Searches Community Forums, Blog and more

  • 0
Sign in to follow this  
asknod

CUE Karmageddon

Question

I love antique CUE. VA makes so many mistakes  it's almost impossible not to find one of these in your files. Finding another after you find one in the same decision is a hoot, too.

https://asknod.org/2017/08/05/malcolm-in-the-middle-part-iv-karmageddon/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

They need to do away with the 1 year bullsh*t.  

Most Veterans post service can't find the a$$, much less become medical legal expert witnesses in less than a year.

Maybe we could find a new Veteran willing to submit a claim for every ailment in the Merck manual.  2 or 3 thousand issues.  Then he would be covered for some thing that pops up three years later.

Just sayin,

Hamslice

Asknod, a good read, thanks..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ad

  • 0

I agree with Hamslice.  The problem I have with the one year limitations on appeal are twofold:

1.  Why a deadline for Veterans, and no deadline for VA to process the claim?  Is this a claimant friendly, non adversarial system?  If it were claimant friendly non adversarial, then VA would have a deadline of processing claims of 1 year, and the Veteran could appeal at any time.  

2.  Again, I dont view as a claimant friendly non adversarial system where, if the VETERAN fails to appeal within the one year deadline he suffers the "penalty" of raising the standard of review to the obstenatcious "cue" standard of review.    In other words, since the Veteran was probably suffering from PTSD, and or other disorders, let's penalize him for doing precisely what this causes...putting off stuff you really need to do.  

     I see this right now with my son.  He should have gone to the VA within a year of discharge, gotten evaluated, and applied for benefits.  No, he wont do that, in no small part because of his military training ("suck it up, soldier, you are fine").  This happens even tho my son sees nothing wrong with living in his house without electricity or water.  "I did not have electricity or running water in Iraq, so I dont need it now."

      Its as if he is still in Iraq.  I cant help him, and by the time he eventually sees that he needs help, it may well be too late.  I dont know what he saw there, but I do know he needs help. 

      The so called "non adversarial claimant friendly" system is a farce, designed to lure Veterans into thinking VA or their VSO is their friend.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Not only is there no statute of limitations for apply for VA benefits, there is also no limit to the number of times you can apply for benefits. This means that if you are denied benefits at every level of appeal, you can start all over again with a brand new application.

 At this point I would recommend an experience VA Rep  or VA Disability Attorney as to see what course of actions you should take.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

To reopen a previously denied claim REQUIRES new and material evidence not previously considered (38 CFR 3.156) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Roger that, Big Poppa, but imagine how far we've come from "a well-grounded claim" in the pre-2001/pre-VCAA days. Nowadays, N&ME can be as vicarious as a statement from your wife, a new letter from your doctor re your ailments or finding old STRs from service which were not part of the record before the agency in the last adjudication process. Our rights as claimants continue to increase exponetially each and every day. I think the biggest one is allowing JSRRC records in as 3.156(c) evidence allowing for a much earlier effective date, assuming, of course, you had the wherewithal to have filed when you exited the service.

In some instances, when we appeal all the way to the CAVC or Fed. Circus, we create new case law for those who follow in our steps later. Think of Joe Fenderson, Norm Gilbert, Benito Layno and all the others who lost but made it possible for us to win at this poker game. Worry less about what the VA adjudication system isn't and focus on the miracle that even allows us to file a Motion to Revise or to keep reopening it until we prevail. No other comparable system exists in constitutional law. It is unique to the VA and no other.

The absolute best part is being allowed to practice law and fix these antique inequities for Vets. If VA ever decides to be honest and grant what is due without a fight, I'd be out of a job in short order. Which, incidentally, would suit me just fine. I'd rather spend my last days farting around in a VA-provided greenhouse!

Another thing many of us overlook is the value of what Theresa created here. How many of you would still be dead in the water without the knowledge of our combined experiences discussed here? Very few Veterans websites have such a valuable collection of wins and a careful explanation of how to repair prior errors. The only thing I observe is that some tend to offer advice based entirely on their personal experience and presume it is applicable in all instances. In all my years doing this (28), I see one constant-no two claims are remotely alike. Each one is a unique set of circumstances that requires legal insight-not experience. I stared at Malcolm's claim for six years and walked past a simple, basic error even a VLJ and a CAVC Judge and her acolytes missed. I was also itching to use my newly-coined word Karmageddon, too. Another NOVA atty. friend gives it a 6-1 odds of a win at Houston. My VLJ friend gives it a 2-1 based on who gets the docket in DC and a 5/9 of a reversal and win at the CAVC- all of which are better odds than emptying your wallet at a casino.

Win or Die

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Ads

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Our picks

    • I filed for my mitral valve regurgitation heart disease secondary to a service-connected condition on 7-30-18. It was granted on 8-30-18. Since I filed for this heart valve issue and was awarded, can I still file for hypertension ? I have been seeing comments that you should file for hypertension first and file for heart disease as a secondary. Can I file for hypertension as a secondary to my heart disease ? I am alittle confused on this matter.

      Dan
    • How to Change the Theme - Look and Colors
      How to Change the Theme - Look and Colors
      • 5 replies
    • For Calculating Retro

      VA Disability Compensation Rates 2012 | 2011 | 2010-2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999

      Prior to 1999 check here https://www.hadit.com/va-disability-compensation-rates-historic-for-retro-calculation/
      • 0 replies
    • I am a 100% disabled veteran, At first I was super excited to find out I am getting retro pay for back benefits to 2006. But that was over 2 months ago. I been waiting and waiting and calling to ask them wheres my back pay. They first told me "one month" than I call again. The guy started reading a script of basically "we are malingering on paying you" type crap. I was wondering if there is any number I can call besides that 800-827-1000 number to inquire about my status. I don't know why its taken so long when there is specific information telling them from the judge that VA owes. 

      There was a remanded to see if I was eligible for IU (I get it now since 2014 im actually 90% with 10 of that been IU). I been on SS since 2004. Can Someone help me out? Thank you
      • 6 replies
    • You might have a 38 CFR 3.156 situation-

      meaning the VA might have considered your claim in 95/96 as "not well grounded" and failed to even get your STRs.Or they did get your STRs but never considered the specific entry you cited here.

      Lots of discussion under a search, of 38 CFR. 3.156 (a)(b) (c) ---here is a winner:

      https://community.hadit.com/topic/52994-cue-in-failing-to-apply-the-provisions-of-38-cfr-§-3156c-for-effective-date/

      o

       
        • Thanks
×

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines