Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Rate this question


Sailorman

Question

I was discharged from Navy in 1996. I have theater service but the VA did not apply my wartime service towards my presumptive disabilities. This error has caused the VA to deny my many benefits. Most recently, my Specially Adapted Housing Grant and Specially monthly compensation claims that were denied in 2014. 

I recently requested for the VA to reopen based on N&M evidence (being my evaluations proving that I was in desert storm at that time.)  Subsequently, both claims were reopened. Does this mean both were both will be granted and rated?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 9
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

No- it just means that they have reopened the claims. But it Great that they did.

I have theater service but the VA did not apply my wartime service towards my presumptive disabilities. This error has caused the VA to deny my many benefits. Most recently, my Specially Adapted Housing Grant and Specially monthly compensation claims that were denied in 2014. "

Do you mean the Gulf War Presumptives?  I gave you a link to them in a prior post you made....

"I recently requested for the VA to reopen based on N&M evidence (being my evaluations proving that I was in desert storm at that time."

Was that in your military Personnel Record? I am surprised they missed your incountry GW proof.

You might have the basis for a 38 CFR 3.156 claim- Newly Discovered Service Records- searchable here.

Is the100% you have now based on one SC or on a combined rating.?

SMC is discussed at length in our SMC forum here.

Can you scan and attach the SMC denial? (Cover C file, name, prior to scanning it)

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

“No- it just means that they have reopened the claims. But it Great that they did.” 

Oh, ok thank you very much. I didn’t know. I  still have a battle then i guess. 

 “Do you mean the Gulf War Presumptives?  I gave you a link to them in a prior post you made....”

Yes, it I meant GWP. Yes, I read the links you provided previously. They were very helpful. It was very much appreciated it. 

“Was that in your military Personnel Record? I am surprised they missed your incountry GW proof.”

Yes, it was my military record that was missed.  The strange thing is I not new to the VA. It seem as though they became a creature of habit over time. I would have never learn of the error if the VA never went electronic in submitting online claims. 

“You might have the basis for a 38 CFR 3.156 claim- Newly Discovered Service Records- searchable here.”

hmmm! Thanks, I will look into to this. 

 “Is the100% you have now based on one SC or on a combined rating.?”

Neither, I’m currently TDIU P&T

 SMC is discussed at length in our SMC forum here.

 Can you scan and attach the SMC denial? (Cover C file, name, prior to scanning it)

will do! I need to send my daughter down in the base to get the decision package. 

 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

I agree.  Dont let VA hornswaggle you out of your effective date(s).  Apart from 1) delays 2) denials, VA's third favorite thing is to hornswagle your effective date.  

Read 38 cfr 3.156 b AND 3.156 c to see if they apply to you, and to see if VA applied these correctly!  

3.156 c is all about SERVICE records, but 3.156 b is also critical if your claim was "pending".  Pending means not finally adjuticated.  Your claim becomes "finally adjuticated" one year after your VARO decision, or, your appeals run their course, whichever is longer.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Thanks broncovet. I will review 38 cfr 3.156 b AND 3.156 c.  I believe both maybe applicable in my case because I have both an appeal pending and denials at the VA. I appreciate the advice. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Hello Bertha. I attached the denial of the SMC from the VA in 2015. 

 

FYI, just so you that know the muscle weakness due to statin induced medication is incorrect diagnosis. After further genetic studies I was diagnosed with an adult unset of MD. I’m also service connected for Knees, ankles and my back (since 1996). 

 

Edited by Sailorman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use