Jump to content
  • Searches Community Forums, Blog and more

  • 0
Sign in to follow this  
cetay

Are Missed Lab Reports/Diagnostics New and Material Evidence?

Question

Are Missed Lab Reports/Diagnostics New and Material Evidence?

                Really wanted to thank everyone for their help in advising me. Since the last time I`ve posted I have went from 20% (for 30 years) to 80 %. My original claim for kidney disease was denied, with the help of a VSO, and is with the DRO to date. I decided no one would have the time to look at the 6000 plus pages and filed my other claims pro se. Following the guidance in this forum I was service connected for migraines (50%) tinnitus (10%), and left ventricular hypertrophy (30%) in addition to my original service connected HBP (20%). I really appreciate your help.

                I ordered my c-file and looked through all five-thousand pages and found that in 1981 and again in 1983 I had filed claims for hypertensive vascular disease (hypertension and enlarged heart disease). In the VA doctors evaluation of my claim, he mentioned there was no evidence of an enlarged heart.In the diagnostic ekg and chest xray reports, for 1981 and 1983, they both reported enlarged heart diagnoses.      

                Could these reports be considered as new and material evidence because the doctor in making his decision didn’t take into  consideration the material fact of conclusive evidence? Va just rated me with and enlarged this year (left ventricular hypertrophy) and gave me a 30% rating. Question: could this constitute an claim for an earlier effect date, a CUE perhaps? Not sure how to look at this revelation.

Thank in advance for any replies.

Cedric

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I think it could be looked at both ways-

in the older claims ( for LVH) did they mention and rate the LVH at all?

I am glad you took the time to read all through your medical records. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ad

  • 0

We dont know how relevant they are.  Do the lab reports have anything to do with a diagnosis, or a nexus?  

Sometimes doctors use labs to diagnose specific diseases.  

They should be "new" if VA has not seen such report before, but I certainly dont know how likely they are to change anything.  

The "bar" is low that you have to have for "new and material" evidence.  It does not necessarily mean the new evidence is "positively outcome determinative", but only that its "plausable" it could change the result.  

The VA is required to review the applicable evidence and issue a decision as to whether or not the "new evidence" is sufficient to meet the standard to "reopen" the claim.  

Some evidence would obviously not make a difference.  If the doctor did an exam, for example, which did not include glucose tests, then those results may not matter as to whether or not you have diabetes.  However, if his tests included an A1C test, then the results of that test could positively identify or rule out diabetes. 

The same with high blood pressure.  A single incident of when your blood pressure is high may not lead to a diagnosis of hbp.  The doctor would consider the reason your blood pressure is high.  And, he would likely confirm/rule out high blood pressure diagnosis if your blood pressure was high on multiple readings.  

Some people get high blood pressure when they are excited, for example.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

If this veteran is referring to the Progress Notes on Myhealthvet???, they can be used as evidence in a claim  even if they were over looked, these progress notes are considered to be a matter of medical records and the good thing about these notes is  if a veteran fails to add them in with his claim for credible evidence   they are dated, normally  when the Dr writes his/her report  usually the same day you see this Dr..

I have used these for some of my claims and the VA Accepted them, one time they accepted them and I had a private urologist specialist I paid a lot of $$ to write me a nexus  as least likely as not...the Rater used my progress notes and never mention this private Doc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Thanks everyone, Berta, broncovet, Buck52, for your prompt reply. The ekg and the x-rays were done in conjunction with my filing of a claim for hypertension and enlarged heart. On active duty, there was concern about my blood pressure (long standing) and in evaluating it was found through ekg and x-ray i was a suspect for an enlarged heart.

                 I was discharged in 6/1981 and filed a disability claim for hypertensive vascular disease, for which I was awarded a 20% disability for hypertension. The compensation examiner in his report (8/81) stated that I did not have an enlarged heart "The heart is regular, it is not enlarged." The doctor interpreting the chest x-ray, for the same compensation exam on (8/81), stated that the heart is enlarged (Chest films reveal that by measurement the heart is enlarged, the CTR is 17.5.32 cm).

                In 12/83 I filed another claim for hypertensive vascular disease for an enlarged heart (left ventricular hypertrophy) and was denied. The same x-ray physician again found "Examination of the chest shows by measurement the heart is slightly enlarged. The CTR is 16.5:31.2 cm"

                Now in 4/2018 I`ve been service connected for a disease which should have been service connected in 8/81 and 12/83.

                They did not rate the enlarged heart (LVH) because the examiner said I did`nt have it, when the diagnostic testing in my records showed that I did have LVH. The lab reports found a nexus between my in-service hypertension and enlarged heart. My concern is that " New and Material Evidence" has to be evidence that was not already in the record and was not available to the rater at the time. Is this scenario a " Clear and Unmistakable Error" or would filing of an " Earlier Effective Date" fit. I am already service connected for the enlarged heart (LVH) as of 4/2018.

Once again, thanks

 Cedric

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

If your VARO decision was in the past year, the appropriate manner to contest the decision is by filing a NOD.  You need not meet the "CUE" standard of review if the appeal was timely.  

What did the decision (in the evidence section) say?  Did it say it considered this exam?  If it considered it already, no its not new and material evidence under 38 cfr 3.156.  

If the decision did NOT consider this exam, then yes, you could submit this exam as new and material evidence under 3.156 (b) (B if its a pending claim, that is you are still in the appeal period).  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Our picks

    • Sleep apnea- does the DBQ cover the "medically necessary/required" language?
      Hey everybody! Long time lurker, first time poster.

      My question is regarding the sleep apnea language that specifies that a prescription of a breathing assistance device is "medically necessary" for a 50% rating:

      Assuming that a vet is already prescribed a CPAP/APAP by the VA, does the sleep apnea DBQ portion under 2B "IS CONTINUOUS MEDICATION REQUIRED FOR CONTROL OF A SLEEP DISORDER CONDITION?" fulfill that language requirement?
      • 28 replies
    • VBA testimony and GAO report-C & P examiners
      As you all know, C & P exam results control almost all types of claims. VA employees have no choice but to go along with a negative C & P exam that will deny a claim. Some vets are quite willing to rebutt faulty exams and ask for a new C & P exam. For others, it will take a costly IMO/IME in most cases. Ben Krause has this article at his site today: http://tinyurl.com/y9co6zac
      • 9 replies
    • Lumbosacral Strain and Vertebrae fractures caused by osteopenia
      Hi.  I have a couple questions and welcome all recommendations for my disability claim.  I am currently 10% disabled for lumbosacral strain and deferred decision for this and vertebrae fractures caused by osteopenia.  I had a MRI February 2018 and results include moderate compression fracture of L1, mild to moderate compression fracture of L2, moderate to severe compression fracture of L3, mild compression fracture of T11.  Additionally, L3 moderate spinal canal stenosis, L2 mild to moderate retropulsion with mild spinal canal stenosis, multilevel degenerative changes, multilevel disc bulges, disc herniations, L1-L2 mild broad-based disc bulge with mild spinal canal stenosis, L2-L3 mild broad based disc bulge with mild to moderate spinal canal stenosis,  L3-L4 mild to moderate broad based disc bulge and severe bilateral neuroforaminal narrowing.   I have read that these malfunctions should have been claimed individually.  Will the VA evaluate/rate each condition separately?  If not, I may have to appeal or submit a new claim.  What are some thoughts and suggestions.  Do these disabilities belong in the lumbosacral strain or the vertebrae fractures caused by osteopenia.  I am totally in the dark on this stuff.  I am pretty sure no diagnosis codes have been assigned.  What can I do to support my claim?  HELP!!!!!
      • 2 replies
    • Ignore Members Who Annoy You - How To
      How To Ignore Members Who Annoy You

      I'd love it if we all got along, no one had a bad day and everyone respected each other however, living in the real world it just doesn't work that way.

      If you find a member adds no value to your knowledge on a topic hover over their name and then choose Ignore User. You cannot ignore moderators and admins but you can ignore others.

      Thousands of veterans have come here for over 20 years to find answers and support. I wish we could help each and every veteran, but some we cannot. Sometimes folks just rub each other the wrong way and that is where the Ignore User feature comes in. Ignore the user and move on...
      • 1 reply
    • Ignore Members Who Annoy You - How To
      How To Ignore Members Who Annoy You

      I'd love it if we all got along, no one had a bad day and everyone respected each other however, living in the real world it just doesn't work that way.

      If you find a member adds no value to your knowledge on a topic hover over their name and then choose Ignore User. You cannot ignore moderators and admins but you can ignore others.

      Thousands of veterans have come here for over 20 years to find answers and support. I wish we could help each and every veteran, but some we cannot. Sometimes folks just rub each other the wrong way and that is where the Ignore User feature comes in. Ignore the user and move on...
      • 1 reply
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Our picks

    • Sleep apnea- does the DBQ cover the "medically necessary/required" language?
      Hey everybody! Long time lurker, first time poster.

      My question is regarding the sleep apnea language that specifies that a prescription of a breathing assistance device is "medically necessary" for a 50% rating:

      Assuming that a vet is already prescribed a CPAP/APAP by the VA, does the sleep apnea DBQ portion under 2B "IS CONTINUOUS MEDICATION REQUIRED FOR CONTROL OF A SLEEP DISORDER CONDITION?" fulfill that language requirement?
      • 28 replies
    • VBA testimony and GAO report-C & P examiners
      As you all know, C & P exam results control almost all types of claims. VA employees have no choice but to go along with a negative C & P exam that will deny a claim. Some vets are quite willing to rebutt faulty exams and ask for a new C & P exam. For others, it will take a costly IMO/IME in most cases. Ben Krause has this article at his site today: http://tinyurl.com/y9co6zac
      • 9 replies
    • Lumbosacral Strain and Vertebrae fractures caused by osteopenia
      Hi.  I have a couple questions and welcome all recommendations for my disability claim.  I am currently 10% disabled for lumbosacral strain and deferred decision for this and vertebrae fractures caused by osteopenia.  I had a MRI February 2018 and results include moderate compression fracture of L1, mild to moderate compression fracture of L2, moderate to severe compression fracture of L3, mild compression fracture of T11.  Additionally, L3 moderate spinal canal stenosis, L2 mild to moderate retropulsion with mild spinal canal stenosis, multilevel degenerative changes, multilevel disc bulges, disc herniations, L1-L2 mild broad-based disc bulge with mild spinal canal stenosis, L2-L3 mild broad based disc bulge with mild to moderate spinal canal stenosis,  L3-L4 mild to moderate broad based disc bulge and severe bilateral neuroforaminal narrowing.   I have read that these malfunctions should have been claimed individually.  Will the VA evaluate/rate each condition separately?  If not, I may have to appeal or submit a new claim.  What are some thoughts and suggestions.  Do these disabilities belong in the lumbosacral strain or the vertebrae fractures caused by osteopenia.  I am totally in the dark on this stuff.  I am pretty sure no diagnosis codes have been assigned.  What can I do to support my claim?  HELP!!!!!
      • 2 replies
    • Ignore Members Who Annoy You - How To
      How To Ignore Members Who Annoy You

      I'd love it if we all got along, no one had a bad day and everyone respected each other however, living in the real world it just doesn't work that way.

      If you find a member adds no value to your knowledge on a topic hover over their name and then choose Ignore User. You cannot ignore moderators and admins but you can ignore others.

      Thousands of veterans have come here for over 20 years to find answers and support. I wish we could help each and every veteran, but some we cannot. Sometimes folks just rub each other the wrong way and that is where the Ignore User feature comes in. Ignore the user and move on...
      • 1 reply
    • Ignore Members Who Annoy You - How To
      How To Ignore Members Who Annoy You

      I'd love it if we all got along, no one had a bad day and everyone respected each other however, living in the real world it just doesn't work that way.

      If you find a member adds no value to your knowledge on a topic hover over their name and then choose Ignore User. You cannot ignore moderators and admins but you can ignore others.

      Thousands of veterans have come here for over 20 years to find answers and support. I wish we could help each and every veteran, but some we cannot. Sometimes folks just rub each other the wrong way and that is where the Ignore User feature comes in. Ignore the user and move on...
      • 1 reply
  • Advertisemnt

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Donation Box

    Please donate to support the community.
    We appreciate all donations!
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

×

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines