Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Effective Date change

Rate this question


tim8649

Question

I filed a VA claim in 1992 and was sent a letter 2 months later saying claim is deferred also got a letter the next year 1993 saying the the same thing. Went to my local VA office and they told me it was denied but never got a denial letter from the VA. I applied again last year 2017 and was approved. the Question i have is , Should my effective date be for when i just applied or back when i applied in 1992?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

you need to request your C -File and see if that 1992 denial is in it?..very important here. 

if it is then you can reopen this claim and ask the VA to CUE them self. USE THE DENIAL LETTER AS NEW &MATERIEL EVIDENCE, if the deferred claim letter is not in it  you might have those? but they can say they sent these to you .....unless you moved left no forward address and they return to the VA they should be in your C-file.

Since VA Failed to send the denial to you is 1992..& if the denial is not in your C-File  they will probably use the 2017 filing date 

Edited by Buck52

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Thank you Buck52 for your answer.I talked with a VA rep and he looked into my file and seen the two deferred letters but no denial in the file. He said that the deferred claim was never closed. He said i should file a request for reconsideration for rating decision to change my effective date. Is this the right way to proceed ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

TIM

Unless this is correct what your VSR mention

'He said i should file a request for reconsideration for rating decision to change my effective date. Is this the right way to proceed ?''

you want the 1992-93 effective date  reconsideration date will be the new EED. (I am Thinking?) but could be wrong...I need to research it.

I changed my mind after thinking  for you to reopen , if you reopen you will need new an materiel  evidence  however the EED will be the date you  file to reopen ...so disregard that.

The Alternative would be to file a new claim but they will not go back to the 1992-93 dates...

 A deferred rating decision is issued when the claim is underdeveloped (not enough evidence) or if the claim is incomplete

you need new and meterail evidence to support your claim and the VA Needs to let you know this if they have your claim defrred you should have recieved notice and the information letting you know what to do, failure to do this is CUE.

Are you sure you never NOD Back in 1992-93 Claim? 

all your appeals has been exhausted?

I realize you have to be denied to NOD a claim...something is not adding up.

to many years have gone by to have a ''incomplete'' claim?

This claim must have been abandoned without notifying this veteran!

1992-93 Ask the VA to RTC(Rate the Claim)  IF NO DECISION AS BEEN MADE IN ALL THESE YEARS

What you can do  if you have not had a decision on this claim since 1992-93 ( RTC)

 

Other members please chime in here..his claim has been under continuous prosecution since 1992-93 and  recently let him know his claim has been deferred? his claim  has not been decided since 1992-93 

so it has to be a abandoned claim  correct?

I think the claim was closed  but without the veterans knowledge  this would be CUE Correct?

broncovet Ms berta??? what this veterans alternative?

Edited by Buck52

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Buck52 i will go back to the VA next week and talk with the VSR again. But yes he looked it up and also showed me the file and it shows my claim in 1992 and the two deferred letters they sent me and then my new claim in 2017 that was approved. He said that the 92-93 claim was deferred because the VA was waiting on my  STR's, and since i was approved in 2017 with the same STR's that the VA was waiting for back in 92-93, then the effective date should be 1992. Thank you Buck52 for the help

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

IF THEY MADE A DECISON ON THE 92-93 CLAIM Yes they should use those dates  for EED.

.Even if the claims were deferred if they don't give you these dates for EED  get the VSR to show you the regulations that its not! or you may lose out on a lot of retro.

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

Don't file a reconsideration.  File a nod.  You are gonna need a lawyer.  If you don't want to pay 20 percent, then you can pay 100% instead.  Gs7's are not authorized to cut half million dollar checks.  You don't have to like it but people other than Berta don't win 6 figure retros without a lawyer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use