Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Columbia Varo Improves Denials

Rate this question


Testvet

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

If nothing else there process is improving, I filed for a reconsideration on Dec 11, 2006, on January 18th the issued the denial, I applaud their speed and it was coherent, good arguments, a far finer piece of work than there other denials over the past 4 years. This one actually made sense, even I could understand it, unlike the other denials I have recieved.

Now it is finally time to send this mess to BVA, why I don't know it has come to this, but they are claiming that the Edgewood tests were perfectly safe, and I can't prove I was exposed to anything, the problem with that argument is they can't prove I wasn't, but I can prove I was there for 2 months. They have also ignored the fact I had a stroke in April 1992 less than a year from discharge from GW1, any cardiovascular incident should link my current heart problems to that.

100% SC P&T PTSD 100% CAD 10% Hypertension and A&A = SMC L, SSD
a disabled American veteran certified lol
"A journey of a thousand miles must begin with a single step."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Guest jangrin
If nothing else there process is improving, I filed for a reconsideration on Dec 11, 2006, on January 18th the issued the denial, I applaud their speed and it was coherent, good arguments, a far finer piece of work than there other denials over the past 4 years. This one actually made sense, even I could understand it, unlike the other denials I have recieved.

Now it is finally time to send this mess to BVA, why I don't know it has come to this, but they are claiming that the Edgewood tests were perfectly safe, and I can't prove I was exposed to anything, the problem with that argument is they can't prove I wasn't, but I can prove I was there for 2 months. They have also ignored the fact I had a stroke in April 1992 less than a year from discharge from GW1, any cardiovascular incident should link my current heart problems to that.

Mike,

Every time I think about the Edgewood tests and those of you who "volunteered" my mind flashes to your website. I clearly see that vivid picture that you were able to find of your face in that mask breathing in whatever it was that they deided they wanted human testing for. It makes my heart sink to think that they are fighting compensation benefits for the Edgewood veterans.

I went into a sort of shock when I found out that our covernment did this human testing, as a civilian I was very naive, but since I read the info about Edgewood I am government leary. I don't believe a word of what they say any longer. I wish you all the

POWER and INSIGHT you will need to win your claim. Good luck don't give up, there are still other Edgewood vets that will need to be able to read your award. By going to the BVA they will have access to it.

Hang in there you can do it.

Jangrin

Edited by jangrin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest jangrin

Testvet,

Please put your link to your website and your picture from the Edgewood tests days so the newbies here at hadit can see and understand what some of our military veterans went through. It is very educating and helps families understand that the government is not always on the up and up just because they have the authority and the power.

Just a thought to help people new to Hadit.

Jangrin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

my website Outside the beltway.org was hacked and had to be taken down I did however write a post at Daily Kos in August 2006 that explains the mess really well http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/8/6/102919/7467 then there is also a blog that has many postings about my quest for benefits from the VA and the actions or rather inactions by many members of the House and Senate http://notmydaddysblog.blogspot.com/

100% SC P&T PTSD 100% CAD 10% Hypertension and A&A = SMC L, SSD
a disabled American veteran certified lol
"A journey of a thousand miles must begin with a single step."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 3 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use