Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Confused - Appeal to BVA or Higher Level Review EED

Rate this question


BAM_

Question

Hello Vets. Long time reader, first time posting. I hope I can get some advice on my situation as many of you have helped me over the years without even knowing. Thank you!

History - I submitted a claim January 19, 2016 for Increase to SC Ankylosing Spondylitis (Thoracolumbar) Rated at 20%, New Claim - Hip Pain secondary to Ankylosing Spondylitis and Leg Pain secondary ankylosing spondylitis. C&P March 11, 2016, Decision March 24, 2016. No increase for AS (20%) and denied for all secondary claims

Filed NOD February 03, 2017

Opted in to RAMP July 27, 2018 with the RAMP Claim Nov, 25, 2018. C&P January 30, 2019, Decision March 8, 2019. Granted 50% Unfavorable Thoracolumbar Spine, 10% Right Hip, 10% Left Hip secondary to Ankylosing, denied leg / knee pain. My EED of January 30, 2019, not what I was expecting

Present - I was going over my C&P exams trying to understand why my EED wasn't January 19, 2016, since that is when I put in the original claim. I also wanted to know what was the difference between the March 11, 2016 exam and the January 30th, 2019 exam that got me the increase for my Thoracolumbar and both Hips being rated since they used the same XRAYS and MRI in both exams.

Well I noticed that on the March 11, 2016 exam the examiner answered:

 9. Ankylosis    -----------    Is there ankylosis of the spine? [X] Yes   [ ] No       [X] Favorable ankylosis of the entire thoracolumbar spine

This is from the January 30th, 2019 exam and I was awarded 50%

 9. Ankylosis    -----------    Is there ankylosis of the spine? [X] Yes   [ ] No       [X] Unfavorable ankylosis of the entire thoracolumbar spine

It seems like they should have at the very least increased my SC Ankylosing Spondylitis to 40% from 20% on the March 24, 2016 decision based on the spine ratings. But they didn't give me an increase.

So I wasn't sure what to do and took this information to my County Veteran service organization and they put in an NOD BVA appeal. When I didn't see my appeal showing up on VA.GOV I called them and they said they gave my appeal form  my POA VFW, ok so I call the VFW and they confirm they submitted it, fine.

My BVA appeal shows up and I had a question about it so I called my VSO at the VFW and ask my question and then say: "Oh you don't want a BVA appeal for this, we need to cancel this appeal and put in for a Higher Review request"

This is where I'm at two weeks ago they had me sign a form VA FORM 21-4138 canceling my BVA appeal and submitted VA FORM 20-0996 Decision Review Request: Higher Level Review.

I'm so confused if this was the right approach. Any advice would be much appreciated. If you all think I should post my decision letters to really help, I can do that as well.

Here are the spine ratings:

Rating

Cervical Spine

Thoracolumbar Spine

100%

Entire spine frozen in an unfavorable

 position.

 

50%

 

Entire thoracolumbar spine frozen in an unfavorable

position.

40%

Entire cervical spine frozen in an unfavorable

 position.

Flexion measures 30° or less. 

-OR- 

Entire thoracolumbar spine frozen in a favorable

position.

30%

Flexion measures 15° or less.

-OR-

Entire cervical spine is frozen in a favorable

 position.

 

20%

Flexion measures more than 15° but not more than 30°.

-OR-

Combined ROM is 170° or less.

Flexion measures more than 30° but not more than 60°.

-OR-

Combined ROM is 120° or less.

10%

Flexion measures more than 30° but less than 45°.

-OR-

Combined ROM is between 175° and 340°.

Flexion measures more than 60° but less than 90°.

-OR-

Combined ROM is between 125° and 240°.

0%

Flexion measure 45° or more.

-OR-

Combined ROM measures 340° or more.

Flexion measures 90° or more.

-OR-

Combined ROM measures 240° or more.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Moderator

Your effective date is the later of the "facts found" (this means the date the doc said you became disabled), or the date of claim, with some exceptions.  

The only time I suggest filing a "higher level review" request, is WHEN YOU ARE CERTAIN VA HAS ALL YOUR EVIDENCE.   Otherwise, opt for the alternative, supplemental claim lane.  Mostly we dont know what evidence the VA has.  Even if we got a copy of our claims file last week, we dont know what "new" evidence just arrived.  Your evidence can be checked in real time with a VBMS review.  Vets dont have this access, only attorneys and accredited representivives have access to the Veterans VBMS file, and only then if the representative jumps through the Va hoops to obtain access.  

I concur that it appears you have sufficient evidence as of your c and p exam, however, I dont know if Va has that c and p exam in their possession.  

Do you know if your VSO has VBMS access??  Did your representative review your file to ensure all the evidence was there?  Otherwise, you should always opt for supplemental claim lane and not HLR.  

If you got your information from ebenefits or Va.gov, then you may or may not have accurate information.  Your decision letter from Va should be accurate, tho.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Thank you broncovet for your reply.  My VSO does have VBMS access. I know this because after I brought up the issues with the first C&P  exam compared to the second C&P exam, she pulled up that exam and found where the examiner marked: Ankylosis  and check Favorable. 

Since they submitted a Higher Level Review and had me cancel the BVA claim I believe the evidence is in the file, other wise I don't understand why they would have choose that lane since it seems like that lane is not one that should be picked based on your answer. 

I believe I did see where I can still submit a supplemental claim lane if I get denied from the Higher Level Review lane. Just frustrating since I feel I was given the wrong advice. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
15 hours ago, BAM_ said:

other wise I don't understand why they would have choose that lane since it seems like that lane is not one that should be picked based on your answer. 

just an opinion here and my own recent experience with my VSO which is the American Legion and I was at the VARO building where they have an office.

The woman literally stated "...we work for the VA..." as she was trying to dissuade me from filing an Appeal and from asking for records of my latest C&P's, DBQs, Code Sheet, Letters to and from the VA/C&P provider and Dr's notes.

this has been an on-going war with VA and my VSO over this.

If you want to add or be able to add, new information go Supplemental Lane. If you think the VA has all your evidence the HLR would be faster but their denial rate is huge, so it is basically the dog wagging the tail for many vets.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

GeekySquid that is a scary statement "we work for the VA..."

I think I'm going call and try to talk with the VSO at the VFW Monday to see if I can get a better feel for what their strategy is, at the same time I think I may need to take more control, just not sure how at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use