Jump to content


  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Advertisemnt

  • Trouble Remembering? This helped me.

    I have memory problems and as some of you may know I highly recommend Evernote and have for years. Though I've found that writing helps me remember more. I ran across Tom's videos on youtube, I'm a bit geeky and I also use an IPad so if you take notes on your IPad or you are thinking of going paperless check it out. I'm really happy with it, I use it with a program called Noteshelf 2.

    Click here to purchase your digital journal. HadIt.com receives a commission on each purchase.

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • 0
Sign in to follow this  
Kevin Hollins

C&P exam ptsd

Question

I admitted during a C&P exam for PTSD  having a DUI back in 1988, my PTSD was caused during incident that I experience while I served on board ship, never had another incident, will this be used to deny my claim?  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

The answer turns, IMHO, on whether or not your doctor stated something close to:

"The Veteran's (incident on board ship) was due to the Veterans own willful misconduct".  

In other words, if you get into trouble, especially with alcohol in the service, the doctor makes a judgement call as to whether or not (your in service injury) was due to willful misconduct.

If this doc said you were guilty of willful misconduct, this will likely preclude SC.  

However, if they denied benefits because of getting drunk or stoned ONCE, the VA would go out of business and shut down.  

If the VA does not have evidence in your file that your (incident on board ship) was due to your willful misconduct, then you should be okay.  

"Willful misconduct" determination is made "at the time of the incident", and not years later when we apply for benefits.  If the doctor does "not" state whether this was willful misconduct, then its presumed your incident was not willful misconduct.  

The doc has to say its willful misconduct.  

However, your admission to the c and p examiner "can be used as evidence against you".  

The short answer is we dont know if your statement will lead to a denial or not.  This will likely be a judgement call by the decision maker, and, it can be appealed.  

Looking to the future, you are not medically competent to diagnose your own illnesses, so I would also presume you are not competent to determine "willful misconduct"..a medical determination.  

Therefore, altho your statement(s) can be used against you, You can not diagnose yourself, and you can not determine "willful misconduct".  This is just my opinion, and a decision maker may decide otherwise.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

No.  I had two dui.  One in service and one out of service.  Last one was over 10 years ago.  The first one in service had nothing to do with the things that caused PTSD (and TBI in my case).  I told them everything.  I told them I binged drink back in my military days too; and occasionally when I got out.  Same with MJ use.  TBI was a different story.  I did have a C&P examiner try to vaguely blame cognitive issues on alcohol and MJ.  She will loose as I have 3 other opinions stating otherwise.  But it is the VA.  They may disregard the 3 nexus and dbq's and go with hers.  They will loose.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

the answer is situational and contextual. Broncovet is on target.

If your DUI was related somehow to the event on the ship...like you got drunk, got arrested, went back to ship still drunk, and THEN had the event, then yes they can make a causal chain argument.

If you were documented, before the event, to be drunk on duty or hungover on duty, then the DUI would just be another brick in the wall.

If however the DUI and or any record of drunk on duty, bad behavior, etc, happened AFTER your in-service event, then it can be made to work in your favor. It would amount to "see bad thing XXX happened and I started falling apart right then.. "
 

Until you get a decision from the VA, there is not much any of us can really say that will directly help you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

It was after the incident when the ship returned to port while at sea  me seeing my Shipmate die at sea and me almost getting washed overboard during a bad storm where I was ordered to do a very hazardous task  

Thanks for your feedback

Edited by Kevin Hollins

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
5 minutes ago, Kevin Hollins said:

Thanks for your feedback

I believe everyone here is supportive of you, and it is great that you responded with that info.

sadly my last sentence in that post still applies.

Until you get a decision from the VA, there is not much any of us can really say that will directly help you.

If you want to start redacting the evidence you have while you wait for the BBE that would be a good use of time. Then redact the BBE if it doesn't award you what you are asking for, and then post all of them so we can help suggest things to attack that potential denial.

If you have not ordered your C-file I would suggest you do that now, it takes like six months these days and your C&P is likely to already be there by the time they create your cdrom.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Ads

  • Our picks

    • Peggy toll free 1000 last week, told me that, my claim or case BVA Granted is at the RO waiting on someone to sign off ,She said your in step 5 going into step 6 . That's good, right.?
        • Thanks
      • 6 replies
    • I took a look at your documents and am trying to interpret what happened. A summary of what happened would have helped, but I hope I am interpreting your intentions correctly:


      2003 asthma denied because they said you didn't have 'chronic' asthma diagnosis


      2018 Asthma/COPD granted 30% effective Feb 2015 based on FEV-1 of 60% and inhalational anti-inflamatory medication.

      "...granted SC for your asthma with COPD w/dypsnea because your STRs show you were diagnosed with asthma during your military service in 1995.


      First, check the date of your 2018 award letter. If it is WITHIN one year, file a notice of disagreement about the effective date. 

      If it is AFTER one year, that means your claim has became final. If you would like to try to get an earlier effective date, then CUE or new and material evidence are possible avenues. 

       

      I assume your 2003 denial was due to not finding "chronic" or continued symptoms noted per 38 CFR 3.303(b). In 2013, the Federal Circuit court (Walker v. Shinseki) changed they way they use the term "chronic" and requires the VA to use 3.303(a) for anything not listed under 3.307 and 3.309. You probably had a nexus and benefit of the doubt on your side when you won SC.

      It might be possible for you to CUE the effective date back to 2003 or earlier. You'll need to familiarize yourself with the restrictions of CUE. It has to be based on the evidence in the record and laws in effect at the time the decision was made. Avoid trying to argue on how they weighed a decision, but instead focus on the evidence/laws to prove they were not followed or the evidence was never considered. It's an uphill fight. I would start by recommending you look carefully at your service treatment records and locate every instance where you reported breathing issues, asthma diagnosis, or respiratory treatment (albuterol, steroids, etc...). CUE is not easy and it helps to do your homework before you file.

      Another option would be to file for an increased rating, but to do that you would need to meet the criteria for 60%. If you don't meet criteria for a 60% rating, just ensure you still meet the criteria for 30% (using daily inhaled steroid inhalers is adequate) because they are likely to deny your request for increase. You could attempt to request an earlier effective date that way.

       

      Does this help?
    • Thanks for that. So do you have a specific answer or experience with it bouncing between the two?
    • Tinnitus comes in two forms: subjective and objective. In subjective tinnitus, only the sufferer will hear the ringing in their own ears. In objective tinnitus, the sound can be heard by a doctor who is examining the ear canals. Objective tinnitus is extremely rare, while subjective tinnitus is by far the most common form of the disorder.

      The sounds of tinnitus may vary with the person experiencing it. Some will hear a ringing, while others will hear a buzzing. At times people may hear a chirping or whistling sound. These sounds may be constant or intermittent. They may also vary in volume and are generally more obtrusive when the sufferer is in a quiet environment. Many tinnitus sufferers find their symptoms are at their worst when they’re trying to fall asleep.

      ...................Buck
        • Like
    • Precedent Setting CAVC cases cited in the M21-1
      A couple months back before I received my decision I started preparing for the appeal I knew I would be filing.  That is how little faith I had in the VA caring about we the veteran. 

      One of the things I did is I went through the entire M21-1 and documented every CAVC precedent case that the VA cited. I did this because I wanted to see what the rater was seeing.  I could not understand for the life of me why so many obviously bad decisions were being handed down.  I think the bottom line is that the wrong type of people are hired as raters.  I think raters should have some kind of legal background.  They do not need to be lawyers but I think paralegals would be a good idea.

      There have been more than 3500 precedent setting decisions from the CAVC since 1989.  Now we need to concede that all of them are not favorable to the veteran but I have learned that in a lot of cases even though the veteran lost a case it some rules were established that assisted other veterans.

      The document I created has about 200 or so decisions cited in the M21-1.   Considering the fact that there are more than 3500 precedent cases out there I think it is safe to assume the VA purposely left out decisions that would make it almost impossible to deny veteran claims.  Case in point. I know of 14 precedent setting decisions that state the VA cannot ignore or give no weight to outside doctors without providing valid medical reasons as to why.  Most of these decision are not cited by the M21.

      It is important that we do our due diligence to make sure we do not get screwed.  I think the M21-1 is incomplete because there is too much information we veterans are finding on our own to get the benefits we deserve

      M21-1 Precedent setting decisions .docx
      • 5 replies
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines