"Effective July 13, 2010, the regulations governing adjudication of service connection for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) were liberalized, in certain circumstances, with respect to the evidentiary standard for establishing the required in-service stressor. For cases pending before VA as of that date, if a stressor claimed by a veteran is related to the Veteran's fear of hostile military or terrorist activity and a VA psychiatrist or psychologist, or a psychiatrist or psychologist with whom VA has contracted, confirms that the claimed stressor is adequate to support a diagnosis of PTSD and that the Veteran's symptoms are related to the claimed stressor, in the absence of clear and convincing evidence to the contrary, and provided the claimed stressor is consistent with the places, types, and circumstances of the Veteran's service, the Veteran's lay testimony alone may establish the occurrence of the claimed in-service stressor. For purposes of this paragraph, "fear of hostile military or terrorist activity" means that a veteran experienced, witnessed, or was confronted with an event or circumstance that involved actual or threatened death or serious injury, or a threat to the physical integrity of the Veteran or others, such as from an actual or potential improvised explosive device; vehicle-imbedded explosive device; incoming artillery, rocket, or mortar fire; grenade; small arms fire, including suspected sniper fire; or attack upon friendly military aircraft, and the Veteran's response to the event or circumstance involved a psychological or psycho-physiological state of fear, helplessness, or horror. 38 C.F.R. § 3.304 (f)(3); see 75 Fed. Reg. 39843 (July 13, 2010)."
They are difficult to find here- this is in addition to my article on Definition of a stressor-these regulation were developed primarily for OIF/IEF veterans but can be used for any PTSD claim, whereby the veteran had "fear of hostile military or terrorist activity."
If " the claimed stressor is consistent with the places, types, and circumstances of the Veteran's service, the Veteran's lay testimony alone may establish the occurrence of the claimed in-service stressor." This i an important facet that can apply to all PTSD claims.
That does not include problems with Command. That is not a stressor ( I had a local vet with that reason as giving him PTSD- that won't work).
The Definition of a Stressor article I did long ago ere (post 2010) is still applicable in many ways.
Question
Berta
"Effective July 13, 2010, the regulations governing adjudication of service connection for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) were liberalized, in certain circumstances, with respect to the evidentiary standard for establishing the required in-service stressor. For cases pending before VA as of that date, if a stressor claimed by a veteran is related to the Veteran's fear of hostile military or terrorist activity and a VA psychiatrist or psychologist, or a psychiatrist or psychologist with whom VA has contracted, confirms that the claimed stressor is adequate to support a diagnosis of PTSD and that the Veteran's symptoms are related to the claimed stressor, in the absence of clear and convincing evidence to the contrary, and provided the claimed stressor is consistent with the places, types, and circumstances of the Veteran's service, the Veteran's lay testimony alone may establish the occurrence of the claimed in-service stressor. For purposes of this paragraph, "fear of hostile military or terrorist activity" means that a veteran experienced, witnessed, or was confronted with an event or circumstance that involved actual or threatened death or serious injury, or a threat to the physical integrity of the Veteran or others, such as from an actual or potential improvised explosive device; vehicle-imbedded explosive device; incoming artillery, rocket, or mortar fire; grenade; small arms fire, including suspected sniper fire; or attack upon friendly military aircraft, and the Veteran's response to the event or circumstance involved a psychological or psycho-physiological state of fear, helplessness, or horror. 38 C.F.R. § 3.304 (f)(3); see 75 Fed. Reg. 39843 (July 13, 2010)."
https://www.va.gov/vetapp15/Files6/1547678.txt
They are difficult to find here- this is in addition to my article on Definition of a stressor-these regulation were developed primarily for OIF/IEF veterans but can be used for any PTSD claim, whereby the veteran had "fear of hostile military or terrorist activity."
If " the claimed stressor is consistent with the places, types, and circumstances of the Veteran's service, the Veteran's lay testimony alone may establish the occurrence of the claimed in-service stressor." This i an important facet that can apply to all PTSD claims.
That does not include problems with Command. That is not a stressor ( I had a local vet with that reason as giving him PTSD- that won't work).
The Definition of a Stressor article I did long ago ere (post 2010) is still applicable in many ways.
https://community.hadit.com/topic/51577-new-post-defining-a-stressor/page/2/
One does not need to be in combat to have a valid PTSD stressor.
MST PTSD has a full forum here as those claims are handled differently that non MST PTSD claims.
And don't overlook Clemons-
It is explained in my Definition of a Stressor article.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
1
1
1
Popular Days
Apr 15
3
Top Posters For This Question
Berta 1 post
broncovet 1 post
Buck52 1 post
Popular Days
Apr 15 2020
3 posts
2 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now