Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules
- 0
Editorial: The Nation Is Failing Its Mentally Wounded
Rate this question
Asked by
Guest allan,
-
Tell a friend
-
Recent Achievements
-
Our picks
-
Are all military medical records on file at the VA?
RichardZ posted a topic in How to's on filing a Claim,
I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful. We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did. He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims. He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file. It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to 1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015. It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me. He didn't want my copies. Anyone have any information on this. Much thanks in advance.-
- 3 replies
Picked By
RichardZ, -
-
Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
Tbird posted a record in VA Claims and Benefits Information,
Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL
This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:
Current Diagnosis. (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)
In-Service Event or Aggravation.
Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”-
- 0 replies
Picked By
Tbird, -
-
Post in ICD Codes and SCT CODES?WHAT THEY MEAN?
Timothy cawthorn posted an answer to a question,
Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability ratingPicked By
yellowrose, -
-
Post in Chevron Deference overruled by Supreme Court
broncovet posted a post in a topic,
VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.
They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.
This is not true,
Proof:
About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because when they cant work, they can not keep their home. I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason: "Its been too long since military service". This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA. And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time, mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends.
Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly. The VA is broken.
A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals. I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision. All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did.
I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt". Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day? Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.Picked By
Lemuel, -
-
Post in Re-embursement for non VA Medical care.
broncovet posted an answer to a question,
Welcome to hadit!
There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not. Try reading this:
https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/
However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.
When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait! Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?" Not once. Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.
However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.
That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot. There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.
Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.
Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344
Picked By
Lemuel, -
-
Question
Guest allan
fwd from: Colonel Dan
<http://www.startribune.com/561/story/970231.html>
http://www.startribune.com/561/story/970231.html reprinted below
In military and VA hospitals, there should be no waiting list for
psychiatric beds. The very idea is obscene.
also see: <http://www.startribune.com/562/v-print/story/970222.html>
http://www.startribune.com/562/v-print/story/970222.html
-----Original Message-----
To: Colonel Dan Cedusky
Subject: Editorial: The nation is failing its mentally wounded
Dear Colonel Dan:
This attached editorial is a follow-up to the report of the
totally-unnecessary, and very tragic suicide of ex-Marine Jonathan Schulze,
which was reported in the 1/27/07 issue of the Minneapolis StarTribune. I
would urge you to read and post this editorial.
I have sent messages to my U.S. Senators and to my Congressman, vigorously
protesting this appalling treatment of a returned Iraqi veteran by our
federal government. I have told them that the incompetence and the lack of
accountability is incredible. I have also posted this story on the message
boards of my local VFW and American Legion posts. Yesterday, I traveled to
my home town, to ask the home post to inform its members about this story;
almost unbelievably, the Post Commander was unaware of the story.
I would like to challenge veterans all over the U.S. to join this campaign.
To my fellow veterans, I ask - are you going to join this urgent effort - or
are you going to let your newly-returned "brothers and sisters" down? The
choice is yours to make!
Sincerely,
Stephen L. Langlie
Chisago City, MN
<http://www.startribune.com/561/story/970231.html>
http://www.startribune.com/561/story/970231.html
<http://www.startribune.com/> StarTribune.com
ED013107
Last update: January 30, 2007 - 6:32 PM
Editorial: The nation is failing its mentally wounded
It sends them into emotional danger, then disdains their injuries.
There is something truly grotesque about urging that the United States take
better care of the mentally wounded men and women who come home from Iraq.
Mental wounds are a given of any war, which is why Americans should be
absolutely sure war is necessary before they ever agree to put the lives of
U.S. troops on the line. The extreme anguish that can come from killing
others, risking death and seeing friends die is a wound that relentlessly
keeps on wounding.
When you compound the ordinary mental risks of any war with the confusion of
purpose, repeat deployments and guerrilla nature of the war in Iraq, you
have a situation guaranteed to twist the emotions of many soldiers in ways
so painful and hopeless that some choose death instead, the choice made by
Marine veteran Jonathan Schulze of New Prague, who recently hanged himself.
This is anticipated mental illness, and the honest solution is to quit
sending Americans into the maw of Iraq. As a nation, however, we are
incapable of doing that yet, so we are left with a solemn responsibility for
fixing, as best anyone can, the emotional wounds that veterans present. And
we're failing. Jonathan Schulze is proof of that.
Knowing with certainty what happened with Schulze is impossible, given the
privacy restrictions on the Department of Veterans Affairs and a
bureaucracy's instinctive desire to cover its backside. Perhaps he did not
clearly mention the magical words "feeling suicidal." But no one disputes
this much: Schulze took his life after he was turned away from two VA
hospitals -- in Minneapolis and St. Cloud -- because their psychiatric units
were full.
Imagine what this means. A Marine, trained to suck it up and be manly in his
own eyes and those of his peers, finally is in such overwhelming pain that
he can admit to himself and, most difficult, to others, that he needs
psychiatric help. Having made that extraordinarily difficult decision, he is
told to come back in a few months when the hospital has an opening. That is
akin to telling a heart attack victim to check back when the emergency room
doctor's not busy or a drowning person to wait until a life preserver is
available. In military and VA hospitals, there should be no waiting list for
psychiatric beds. The very idea is obscene.
To make those lists disappear, we need to learn a couple of things. The
first is that mental injuries are real and hurt like hell; they deserve, as
the late Sen. Paul Wellstone knew well, the same attention and care as
life-endangering physical wounds. The second is that the requirements of
military life -- physical and mental strength, discipline and courage -- can
be reconciled with emotional vulnerability and good mental health care,
including recuperation from the wounds many will inevitably suffer while
waging war.
On the second issue, Daniel Zwerdling of National Public Radio reported two
months ago with devastating illumination on just how far the U.S. Army has
to go. Zwerdling's report focused on Fort Carson, Colo., but anecdotal
responses to his story suggest the problems are widespread. Zwerdling told
of soldiers with strong military records who sought mental health assistance
and were, like Schulze, told to come back later, were ridiculed and hazed by
superiors and peers, and in some cases were drummed out of the service for
behaviors that were obvious symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder.
Zwerdling's reporting and Schulze's tragic story make you wonder: What kind
of nation would put men and women in the Iraq hellhole and then treat them
with such disdain when they come home wounded? The answers that come to mind
aren't very nice.
C2007 Star Tribune. All rights reserved.
<http://nmminneapolis.112.2o7.net/b/ss/nmmi...S/0?pageName=Ed
itorials&server=www&channel=opinion&c1=http://www.startribune.com/561/v-prin
t/story/970231.html&c2=&c3=story&c4=&c5=&c6=MN|ST|news|local&c7=editorials&c
8=&c9=&c10=>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Popular Days
Feb 1
1
Popular Days
Feb 1 2007
1 post
0 answers to this question
Recommended Posts