Jump to content
Using an Ad Blocker? Consider adding HadIt.com as an exception. Hadit.com is funded through advertising, ad free memberships, contributions and out of pocket. ×
  • 0




Greetings Hadit family,

I am rated 50% for Pes Planus/Plantars Fascitis. Have had this condition for over 15 years. 

This condition has caused ankle problems. Thinking about opening a claim for my ankles. Is this considered pyramiding?


Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

Posted Images

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Ankles and feet are two different things, so there wouldn't be overlap of the same diagnostic codes for feet vs ankles. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Great. Thank you Brokensoldier.  

I did not know that my ankles were bad off until my last VAMC visit.  Now I have to research and get medical statements. 

Thanks again

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Admin

Some items I think you may find helpful


38 CFR 4.14 Avoidance of Pyramiding




I added links and some text. If you all feel this type of article with links are helpful, please let me know or if you have suggestions for others just PM me @Tbird

Source: Helpdesk.Vetsfirst.org

Except as otherwise provided in the rating schedule, all disabilities, including those arising from a single disease entity, are to be rated separately. Then all ratings are to be combined according to 38 CFR § 4.25. One exception provided for is the anti-pyramiding provision of 38 CFR § 4.14, which states that evaluation of the "same disability" or the "same manifestation" under various diagnoses is to be avoided. The Court has interpreted 38 USC § 1155 as implicitly containing the concept that "the rating schedule may not be employed as a vehicle for compensating a claimant twice (or more) for the same symptomatology; such a result would overcompensate the claimant for the actual impairment of his earning capacity" and would constitute pyramiding. Brady v. Brown,* 4 Vet. App. 206 (1993).*

When two diagnoses, one organic and the other psychological or psychoneurotic, are presented covering the organic and psychiatric aspects of a single disability entity, only one percentage rating will be assigned under the appropriate diagnostic code determined by the rating board to represent the major degree of disability.

38 CFR § 4.132 changed to 38 CFR § 4.130 (emphasis added.) This reference has been replaced see[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 8, 1996)]

(Source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-1996-10-08/html/96-25569.htm

[Sec. 4.132 [Redesignated as Sec. 4.130]

10. Section 4.132 is redesignated as Sec. 4.130 and newly

redesignated Sec. 4.130 is revised to read as follows:](https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-1996-10-08/html/96-25569.htm)


In *Fanning v. Brown,* 4 Vet. App. 225 (1993), the Court reaffirmed its reasoning in Brady that pyramiding of disabilities is to be avoided pursuant to 38 USC section 1155 and 38 CFR section 4.14. In Fanning, the Court, after stating that it is possible for a veteran to have separate and distinct manifestations from the same injury permitting two different disability ratings, remanded the matter to the BVA because it had failed to state "reasons or bases" for denying the separate ratings due to pyramiding. Id.; see 38 U.S.C. § 7104(d)(1); *Gilbert v. Derwinski,* 1 Vet. App. 49, 56–57 (1990); *Esteban v. Brown*, 6 Vet. App. 259, 261 (1994).

Because separate disability ratings are permitted when the symptomatology and manifestations compensated under the DC are not duplicative or overlapping, the Board must specifically consider whether an appellant is entitled to be rated separately or consider under 38 CFR section 4.14, which of the potentially applicable DCs is more appropriate in the case. *See Esteban v. Brown,* 6 Vet. App. 259, 262 (1994) (because none of the symptomatology for the appellant's three conditions in question was overlapping or duplicative, the appellant was entitled to separate disability ratings for each condition); *see also Brady v. Brown,* 4 Vet. App. 203, 206 (1993) (the purpose of the anti-pyramiding provision is to prevent the rating schedule from being used as a vehicle for overcompensating a claimant multiple times for the same symptomatology); 38 CFR § 4.14 ("The evaluation of the same disability under various diagnoses is to be avoided.").

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Advertisemnt

  • How to get your questions answered...


    All VA Claims questions should be posted on our forums. Read the forums without registering, to post you must register it’s free. Register for a free account.

    Tips on posting on the forums.

    1. Post a clear title like ‘Need help preparing PTSD claim’ or “VA med center won’t schedule my surgery” instead of ‘I have a question’.
    2. Knowledgable people who don’t have time to read all posts may skip yours if your need isn’t clear in the title. I don’t read all posts every login and will gravitate towards those I have more info on.
    3. Use paragraphs instead of one huge, rambling introduction or story. Again – You want to make it easy for others to help. If your question is buried in a monster paragraph there are fewer who will investigate to dig it out.

    Leading to:

    Post clear questions and then give background info on them.


    • A. I was previously denied for apnea – Should I refile a claim?
      • was diagnosed with apnea in service and received a CPAP machine but claim was denied in 2008. Should I refile?
    • B. I may have PTSD- how can I be sure?
      • I was involved in traumatic incident on base in 1974 and have had nightmares ever since, but I did not go to mental health while enlisted. How can I get help?

    This gives members a starting point to ask clarifying questions like “Can you post the Reasons for Denial from your claim?” etc.


    Your firsts posts on the board may be delayed before they show up, as they are reviewed, this process does not take long and the review requirement will be removed usually by the 6th post, though we reserve the right to keep anyone on moderator preview.

    This process allows us to remove spam and other junk posts before they hit the board. We want to keep the focus on VA Claims and this helps us do that.

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   


  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines