Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

FOIA Request

Rate this question


Dustoff1970

Question

Yesterday after 4 months I received two QTC C&P exam reports request that I filed on April 16, 2022. The computer disk included the DBQs filled out for 1. My Gerd claim that was granted at 60% and 2. Tinnitus claim granted at 10%.  Both claims were granted after 20 days from date of my filing including the short C&P exam and Audio test.  Both examiners stated my Tinnitus and Gerd was at least as likely as not (greater than 50%) that my GERD was due to PTSD and Tinnitus due to 1970 Vietnam combat.  Many blocks were left unchecked and some spaces for info left blank.  All is good in my Dustoff world.

Edited by Dustoff1970
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Moderator

Often examiners fill out the parts that are relevant to the claim and leave the rest. Sometimes they leave spaces blank and consolidate everything into 1 block, i.e. "Opinion" and "Rationale". Ill often find the re-stated question for the opinion (from us) on the form with the opinion and rationale all in the same block, which is confusing. OR sometimes they will not check the box for Direct or Secondary, yet if I scroll to the bottommost text block on last page the examiner will have it all in there.

It's frustrating, and sometimes ends up generating 'reworks' back to the examiner because a newer VSR looks at the relevant section of the form and sees nothing checked, or no opinion or rationale or whatever, and doesn't scroll through all the sections to find that its been put somewhere else on the form where it wouldn't normally go. 

It also sucks that it took 4 months to get it from the examiner or the VA, but a VSO with 'read' access can get them quicker depending on 1. how overworked they are and if they represent you, or 2. if they have full access to VBMS, which you would think they would have since its about 90% of their job, yet, from reading on Hadit, it seems that some VSOs manage to operate without having read access to VBMS. I find that somewhat impossible to believe- not Hadit, but that a VSO could legitimately do their job without actually being able to see what is in the Cfile. 

The Earth is degenerating these days. Bribery and corruption abound.Children no longer mind their parents, every man wants to write a book,and it is evident that the end of the world is fast approaching. --17 different possible sources, all lacking verifiable attribution.

B.S. Doane College, Mgt Info Systems/Systems Analysis 2008

M.S.Ed. Purdue University, Instructional Development and Technology, Feb. 2021

M.S. Purdue University Information Technology/InfoSec, Dec 2022

100% P/T

MDD

Spine

Radiculopathy

Sleep Apnea

Some other stuff

-------------------------------------------
B.S. Info Systems Mgt/Systems Analysis-Doane College 2008
M.S. Instructional Technology and Design- Purdue University 2021

 

(I AM NOT A RATER- I work the claims BEFORE they are rated, annotating medical evidence in your records, VA and Legal documents,  and DA/DD forms- basically a paralegal/vso/etc except that I also evaluate your records based on Caluza and try to justify and schedule the exams that you go to based on whether or not your records have enough in them to warrant those)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

sorry dude I cannot see your comment. Cheers to you tho.  I am very happy with the friendly nice QTC examiners and their approval of my claims.  VARO raters this time did a fast efficient correct rating based upon only my statements and VA medical records of many years.

Edited by Dustoff1970
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator
2 hours ago, brokensoldier244th said:

Often examiners fill out the parts that are relevant to the claim and leave the rest. Sometimes they leave spaces blank and consolidate everything into 1 block, i.e. "Opinion" and "Rationale". Ill often find the re-stated question for the opinion (from us) on the form with the opinion and rationale all in the same block, which is confusing. OR sometimes they will not check the box for Direct or Secondary, yet if I scroll to the bottommost text block on last page the examiner will have it all in there.

Again, and again where is the heck is management or the supervisors? What, after they assign the claim to workers, they just let them make their own decisions? So, you are saying that those decisions that are returned to the examiners and the claims that are denied for inadequate medical exams are missed/overlooked by the raters and the supervisors? Well yeah, I can see that happening, but it should not happen to the point that the VA has been doing this for decades.

After the VARO recently sent me to a C & P examination and the examiner wrote a favorable medical opinion in my records and the DBQ letter and the VARO still denied my claim. You can’t get me to believe that the VA has gotten better, they are still doing whatever they want and are too lazy or inept to do the right thing but to make sure they are getting their paycheck every two weeks and any overtime for correcting the mistakes they should have caught in the first place. Just imagine it, veterans are told time and time again that, if their decision is wrong, they have to file an appeal or disagreement even when it is the VA’s fault.

Edited by pacmanx1

My intentions are to help, my advice maybe wrong, be your own advocate and know what is in your C-File and the 38 CFR that governs your disabilities and conditions.

Do your own homework. No one knows the veteran’s symptoms like the veteran. Never Give Up.

I do not give my consent for anyone to view my personal VA records.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

If the exams aren't adequate or filled out with the required information, yes, they are sent back to the examiner. I can't speak for the raters- im not a rater and have little to do with that other than making sure the information is in your file, the examination request is filled out with all the requested opinions, and then reviewing them when they come back to make sure the information needed is on them. If I send one to a rater and the opinion is not filled out completely with the necessary information then I take a hit on my performance- which adds up to a lousy review and/or delayed promotion. So, I have a vested interest in making sure they are correctly filled out. I don't interpret them, I make sure that the necessary information is on them. Interpretation isn't my job to do.

The "restated opinion" is the requested opinion- its on the form twice, and its created automatically when the exam request is sent. I'm talking about when the examiners screw up the forms- we don't alter or mess with the opinions at all. First of all they are PDFs, second, they are locked from editing when we get them. 

The Earth is degenerating these days. Bribery and corruption abound.Children no longer mind their parents, every man wants to write a book,and it is evident that the end of the world is fast approaching. --17 different possible sources, all lacking verifiable attribution.

B.S. Doane College, Mgt Info Systems/Systems Analysis 2008

M.S.Ed. Purdue University, Instructional Development and Technology, Feb. 2021

M.S. Purdue University Information Technology/InfoSec, Dec 2022

100% P/T

MDD

Spine

Radiculopathy

Sleep Apnea

Some other stuff

-------------------------------------------
B.S. Info Systems Mgt/Systems Analysis-Doane College 2008
M.S. Instructional Technology and Design- Purdue University 2021

 

(I AM NOT A RATER- I work the claims BEFORE they are rated, annotating medical evidence in your records, VA and Legal documents,  and DA/DD forms- basically a paralegal/vso/etc except that I also evaluate your records based on Caluza and try to justify and schedule the exams that you go to based on whether or not your records have enough in them to warrant those)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
10 minutes ago, brokensoldier244th said:

If the exams aren't adequate or filled out with the required information, yes, they are sent back to the examiner. I can't speak for the raters

The problem is no one is checking to make sure the exam is inadequate.

Like a higher up. Because it's bogus 

There is no way that va has to do 5 6 comp exams for the same thing.

Because the examiner did say.

Two word or didn't check a box are you joking.

The evidence is in the report. So that mean don't address the report at all come on 

So veterans Wait years play this game. Smh

12 minutes ago, brokensoldier244th said:

. So, I have a vested interest in making sure they are correctly filled out. I don't interpret them, I make sure that the necessary information is on them. Interpretation isn't my job to do.

Well if this is good work performance for who ever that allows for the rater or who ever to keep ordering exams needs to be fire.

My opinion.

Last why do you keep trying to give a sad story for the VA.

On a site were veterans are try to fight for there benfits. Smh.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Now back to the 4 month wait to get the results of the comp exam.

Is just crazy it puts the veteran at a disadvantage with there claim or appeal.

You use to be able to get the results in 3 days because they were part of your medical records.

 

An this new stuff help the veteran how.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use