Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Camp Lejeune toxic water and chronic fatigue syndrome

Rate this question


Maury

Question

Hello,

I was stationed at Camp Lejeune on base for over a year during the time the toxic water was present.  Currently I am rated at 60% disability from other conditions.  But it has come into light that the things listed that cause physical problems there at Camp Lejeune many have created problems for me.  Fortunately I have not been diagnosed with cancer but under the Neurobehavior effects these conditions I'm experiencing have been the main factor for not allowing me to work full time up to the time I needed to take an early retirement, approximately 7-8 years. 

Here's the thing, I'm wondering if can help with my current claim I've submitted regarding the toxic water at Camp Lejeune.  Regarding the Neurobehavioral effects claim I've listed Insomnia, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Loss of Memory, Poor Motor Skills, Dizziness, Anxiety and Tension.  In addition I have submitted a Nexus letter from my private doctor confirming all the problems I've been experiencing with connecting evidence.  It is is the review stage with the VA currently.  First off would there be anyone else here that has experienced these problems?  And if so would there be a C&P requested?  I have no problem with the C&P.  But I'm wondering if this could increase my disability rating?  

Thank you.

Maury

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

Welcome to hadit.  

1.  A c and p exam is discretionary, determined by the VA, not us.  Generally, a c and p is used when the VA employee decides a c and p exam could change the outcome.  And, the reverse is true.  As an example, if you have "no" in service event, then a c and p exam is not going to "go back" to your military service and provide an "in service event".  

Thus the outcome would not change in this example, so a c and p exam would rarely be ordered.  We dont know whether or not a c and p exam would be ordered, we could only venture an informed  guess if we had read your file.  Otherwise, flipping a coin would "guess" whether or not one was required.  

2.  As far as the likeliness or degree of disability rating increase, read "1", above.  Your rating should increase if your SC conditions symptoms worsened, since the exam that was used by the previous rater where you got your current disability rating.    If you have one or more "new" conditions you should also apply for those.  

3.  Since you were stationed at camp Lejune, this suggests that your conditions may be a presumptive, but, as you pointed out you apparently dont have cancer.  This is good!  https://www.va.gov/disability/eligibility/hazardous-materials-exposure/camp-lejeune-water-contamination

    This does not mean your conditions cant be sc.  Instead it means you will likely need a nexus, and it sounds like you are on top of this.  

    If you applied for "applicable new conditions" such as CFS, etc, and applicable increase in your present conditions, it sounds like you probably dont have to do anything but wait, "unless" you have ordered a copy of your cfile, and you noticed that critical evidence is missing from your file, then you should submit that evidence.  Hint:  order a copy of your cfile...its often how we can find out why we got denied, or even prevent that denial by submitting new evidence before the denial.  

    Its possible, or even likely, you have medical evidence that somehow did not make it to your cfile and wont be considered unless you submit it.  (38 CFR 3.156) 

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Hi Broncovet,

Your post was very informative and thank you.  Like you said, after all has been filed, I need to wait.  I did get a response from the VA claims regarding my most recent filing.  As it turned out the evidence that was presented to my doctor was not legible according the representative at the VSO when viewing what was initially scanned to the VA claims department.  I had 30 days to respond in which I did with PDF documents that were directly from the website.  The representative at the VSO did send those in to the VA claims department.  The representative at the VSO said there is a good chance a C&P would be requested.  So we will see, I have plenty of evidence of my conditions that are relatable to the Camp Lejeune toxic waters.

Please take care.

Maury 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • dennis simpson earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Dave119 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ShrekTheTank went up a rank
      Contributor
    • kidva went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use