Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Heart diseases

Rate this question


clarence coskrey

Question

I was told that i has a abnormal heart rhythm after retiring from the military in 1994. I was diagnose with heart disease .

In January of 2023 requiring one stent being placed in January and another in July. I hanv never file a VA claim.

would this be consider service related and the heart problem manifested post service?

Thank you for taking time to read this message

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Moderator

Welcome to hadit.  Great question!

Unfortunately, with 

VA the answer is more complex.  

Whether or not this is service connected depends on if you have 3 Caluaza elements:

1.  Current diagnosis of heart problems.  

It sounds like you may well have this covered, according to your post.  

2.  In service event (which caused your heart problems).  Since you unlikely had heart problems prior to service, and you did have heart problems upon retiring, it follows that something in service caused your heart trouble.

3 nexus statement.  this is made by your doctor.

But wait!  Depending upon where you served, and when, you may be eligible for presumptive service connection, such as service in Vietnam, or other places.  

look over this and see if any of these apply to you

https://www.michigan.gov/mvaa/health-and-welfare/service-connected-presumptive-conditions

bottom line:

you are likely eligible for benefits but we dont know your history so we cant say for certain.

i recommend you apply asap

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

If you served with boots on the ground at any time in the Vietnam war or near the coast in Blue Water Navy then you may qualify for presumptive Ischemic heart disease IHD/CAD under the Agent Orange ACT.   Other locations have been added since then such as the Korean DMZ on certain dates and in Thailand at certain bases depending on your actual location and MOS.

As an example I was diagnosed and VA service connected for Nam AO IHD/CAD heart disease in 2017 with now a 60% rating.  I served in Nam as Army medevac pilot in 1970.

38 CFR 4.104 Diagnostic Code 7005 states the requirements for VA service connection of Ischemic heart disease.

I may be wrong but believe that Ischemic IHD/CAD heart disease is the only heart ailment type that is presumed by VA/Congress to have been caused by AGent Orange.

Other will clarify this for you and a qualified VSO at a VA regional office or hospital can be of assist to you with a claim free of charge.

My comment is not legal advice as I am not a lawyer, paralegal or VSO.

 

EditedperfectcombinedcroppedphotoofPerkins498thBurningUH-1HJune91970-Copy-Copy(3).JPG.26e4db46c75fcf0a7f02ff49631bda36.JPG

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

@clarence coskrey Welcome to Hadit! I agree with the good advice posted here by @broncovet and @Dustoff1970.

My father retired from the Army in 1990 and was granted a 0% SC rating for abnormal heart rhythm at that time. He recently filed his first set of claims since then, but those should be completed soon. When I brought up filing claims with the VA, he generally responded with avoidance. 

Look into learning more about effective dates, retroactive compensation payments, and rating protection criteria. You'll see plenty of reasons to consider filing sooner than later. Look into doing an "intent to file" with the VA. It tells the VA you plan to file a disability claim, but gives you one year to formally submit. If you win, your effective date would be back to when you submitted the "intent to file". However, if you don't formally submit, you can still file later, but you would lose your effective date.

 

Edited by Vync

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Community Owner
11 hours ago, Dustoff1970 said:

EditedperfectcombinedcroppedphotoofPerkins498thBurningUH-1HJune91970-Copy-Copy(3).JPG.26e4db46c75fcf0a7f02ff49631bda36.JPG

 

Ok Dustoff1970 I gotta ask the question from one pilot to another did that landing hurt as much as it looks or was that not you?One of the good things about the UH1 was it took a licking and keep on ticking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use