Whether a veteran who has served two separate and distinct periods of qualifying service under the Montgomery GI Bill, 38 U.S.C. § 3001 et seq., and under the Post- 9/11 GI Bill, 38 U.S.C. § 3301 et seq., is entitled to receive a total of 48 months of education benefits as between both programs, without first exhausting the Montgomery benefit in order to obtain the more generous Post-9/11 benefit.
Question
Tbird
22-888 RUDISILL V. McDONOUGH
DECISION BELOW: 55 F.4th 879
LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: 2020-1637
QUESTION PRESENTED:
Whether a veteran who has served two separate and distinct periods of qualifying service under the Montgomery GI Bill, 38 U.S.C. § 3001 et seq., and under the Post- 9/11 GI Bill, 38 U.S.C. § 3301 et seq., is entitled to receive a total of 48 months of education benefits as between both programs, without first exhausting the Montgomery benefit in order to obtain the more generous Post-9/11 benefit.
CERT. GRANTED 6/26/2023
For Our Legal Beagles
22-888 RUDISILL V. McDONOUGH - Supreme Court of the United States.pdf
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
1
1
Popular Days
Dec 18
2
Top Posters For This Question
Tbird 1 post
broncovet 1 post
Popular Days
Dec 18 2023
2 posts
Popular Posts
Tbird
22-888 RUDISILL V. McDONOUGH DECISION BELOW: 55 F.4th 879 LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: 2020-1637 QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether a veteran who has served two separate and distinct periods
broncovet
Im gonna try to remember this case the next time VA starts saying about how VA benefits are a pro claimant system, and this is why VA gets to do stuff like control all of our evidence, often losing or
Posted Images
1 answer to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now