Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Former Naval Station Treasure Island

Rate this question


allan

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

Former Naval Station Treasure Island

Historical Radiological Assessment

Fact Sheet No. 1

November 18, 2004

INTRODUCTION

The Department of the Navy (Navy) is providing this fact sheet

to inform the local community, tenants of the former Naval

Station Treasure Island (Treasure Island), and regulatory

agencies of the Navy’s progress in the preparation of an

Historical Radiological Assessment for Treasure Island. Navy

operations at Treasure Island were primarily for the purpose of

training. Some of the training included the use of radiological

material. Sailors were trained in the calibration and use of

radiation detection equipment and radiological decontamination

procedures. All radiological training activities were conducted

in accordance with strict Federal and State regulatory

requirements. Many of the radiological safety procedures in

use today were developed by the U.S. Navy.

The Navy is presently seeking to interview

current and former Navy personnel, civilian

employees, and contractors regarding

radiological operations at the former Naval

Station Treasure Island (Treasure Island), San

Francisco, California. The Historical Radiological

Assessment will document the historical radiological

activities conducted at Treasure Island including

former uses of radioactive materials and locations

where radioactive materials were used or stored.

Radiological operations at Treasure Island may have

been conducted by any of the following employers or

their contractors: Naval Station Treasure Island, Naval

Schools Command, or Naval Radiological Defense

In 1995, as part of the closure process for the Base, the Navy

confirmed all radiological material used at Treasure Island had

been accounted for and transferred off-base to other Federal

and State of California facilities. In 2003, information was

obtained from a 1950 report detailing the successful cleanup of

radium powder that was spilled in Building 233. However,

today’s allowable radiological levels are lower than 1950 clean

up levels and a radiological survey is currently underway to

verify Building 233 meets today’s allowable level. In an effort

to verify and document all the information about historic

radiological activities at Treasure Island, the Navy is currently

conducting a basewide Historical Radiological Assessment.

Laboratory. Face-to-face interviews, as well as

telephone or email interviews can be arranged.

Information resulting from interviews will be used

for preparation of the Historical Radiological

Assessment. The Navy is interested in obtaining open

and honest oral histories. The Navy is not interested

in pursuing adverse action against interviewees based

on information supplied during the interviews. If

you are a current or former member of the

Navy, civilian employee, or contractor and

have information about radiological

operations at Treasure Island, please contact

Mr. Robert O’Brien, before December 31, 2004

at email address robert.obrien@weston

solutions.com or call 1-800-538-9815.

COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION

WHAT’S NEXT?

The Navy is committed to preparing an accurate and comprehensive

Historical Radiological Assessment. This requires the following steps,

already underway:

• Thorough records research and analysis of military historical

archives.

➠ A records search is being conducted at the

historical records archives in San Bruno,

California, College Park, Maryland, and in

Yorktown, Virginia.

• Personal interviews with current and former installation

personnel who may have information about radiological

operations and Treasure Island.

➠ See page 1 for contact information if you or

someone you know has first-hand information.

• On-site inspections of Treasure Island and records kept on

base.

This information will be published in the Treasure Island Historical

Radiological Assessment, which has an anticipated completion date

of fall 2005. Regular updates on the Historical Radiological

Assessment process will be given at the Navy’s Restoration Advisory

Board meetings. For a schedule of the meetings see the Navy’s

environmental website at http://www.efdsw.navfac.navy.mil/

Environmental/RAB.htm.

DEFINITIONS

RADIAC - A military acronym for radioactive detection,

indication and computation. RADIAC is commonly used as a noun

to mean any radiation detection or measurement instrument.

Radioactive material - A substance that contains or emits

radiation.

Sealed Sources - Any radioactive material that is encased in a

capsule that is designed to prevent leakage or escape of the

material.

2

WHAT IS AN HISTORICAL

RADIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT?

The Historical Radiological Assessment is a detailed report

documenting a Federal facility’s historic radiological activities where

radioactive materials were used or stored. Federal and State

guidelines have been developed detailing how to conduct an Historical

Radiological Assessment. Historical information is obtained by

conducting a thorough records search, interviewing people, and onsite

inspections of locations where radiological materials were

previously present. The Historical Radiological Assessment is also

used as a baseline document to determine if future radiological

evaluation may be necessary at a specific location.

WHAT IS KNOWN SO FAR?

Building 233 – Building 233 was the site of the RADIAC Instrument

Maintenance and Calibration School (see map on page 3). In January

1950, a glass capsule containing radium sulfate powder was broken

during a calibration exercise. Decontamination efforts in 1950

reduced contamination to allowable levels and the building was

reopened in April. However, residual radiological standards have

become more stringent since 1950 and the Navy began the process of

re-evaluating Building 233 in 2004 to ensure it meets current

allowable levels.

Buildings 342, 343, and 344 – Buildings 342, 343, and 344 were

used by the RADIAC Maintenance Calibration School where

personnel were trained in the use and calibration of radiation

detection equipment. Sealed radioactive sources were used in the

training. The RADIAC Maintenance and Calibration School moved

to Orlando, Florida in 1990. The sealed radioactive sources used at

the Treasure Island school were transferred off-base to other approved

facilities. As part of the closure of the RADIAC Maintenance and

Calibration School, the Navy conducted an evaluation which

determined there were no outstanding issues that required further

investigation or cleanup.

Decontamination Training Area and Ship Mockup – In 1958

radiological decontamination training was conducted by Naval

Radiological Defense Laboratory personnel on a ship mockup

(Building 371) in an area near the intersection of 12th Street and

Avenue A. In 1969, the ship mockup (Building 371) was moved to a

location in Parcel T-111. Radiological decontamination training

ended in 1982. All sealed radiological sources used at the T-111 area

were transferred off-base to other approved facilities. The 1988

Basewide Preliminary Assessment/Site Inspection (PA/SI) concluded

that the Decontamination Training Area did not have any outstanding

issues that required further investigation or cleanup.

Treasure Island Historical Radiological Assessment Fact Sheet No. 1 November 18, 2004

0 500 1,000

Scale in Feet

San Francisco Bay

San Francisco Bay

Clipper Cove

1969-1982

Decontamination Training Area

(Ship Mockup Building 371)

Buildings 342/343/344

RADIAC Maintenance and

Calibration School

Building 233

RADIAC Instrument

Maintenance and

Calibration School

1958-1969

Decontamination

Training Area

(Ship mockup Building 371)

3

Treasure Island Historical Radiological Assessment Fact Sheet No. 1 November 18, 2004

Mr. Jim Whitcomb

Remedial Project Manager

Navy BRAC PMO West

1230 Columbia Street, Suite 1100

San Diego, CA 92101-8517

Treasure Island Historical Radiological Assessment Fact Sheet No. 1 November18, 2004

Mr. Jim Whitcomb

Remedial Project Manager

Base Realignment and Closure

Program Managment Office West

1230 Columbia Street, Suite 1100

San Diego, CA 92101-8517

(619) 532-0936

james.h.whitcomb@navy.mil

NAVY POINTS OF CONTACT

Mr. Lee Saunders

Environmental Public Affairs Officer

Naval Facilities Engineering Command

Southwest Division

1220 Pacific Highway

San Diego, CA 92132

(619) 532-3100

lee.saunders@navy.mil

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

0 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

There have been no answers to this question yet

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 1 reply
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use