Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules
- 0
-
Tell a friend
-
Recent Achievements
-
Our picks
-
Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
Tbird posted a record in VA Claims and Benefits Information,
Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL
This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:
Current Diagnosis. (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)
In-Service Event or Aggravation.
Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”-
- 0 replies
Picked By
Tbird, -
-
Post in ICD Codes and SCT CODES?WHAT THEY MEAN?
Timothy cawthorn posted an answer to a question,
Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability ratingPicked By
yellowrose, -
-
Post in Chevron Deference overruled by Supreme Court
broncovet posted a post in a topic,
VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.
They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.
This is not true,
Proof:
About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because when they cant work, they can not keep their home. I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason: "Its been too long since military service". This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA. And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time, mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends.
Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly. The VA is broken.
A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals. I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision. All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did.
I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt". Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day? Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.Picked By
Lemuel, -
-
Post in Re-embursement for non VA Medical care.
broncovet posted an answer to a question,
Welcome to hadit!
There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not. Try reading this:
https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/
However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.
When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait! Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?" Not once. Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.
However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.
That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot. There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.
Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.
Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344
Picked By
Lemuel, -
-
Post in What is the DIC timeline?
broncovet posted an answer to a question,
Good question.
Maybe I can clear it up.
The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more. (my paraphrase).
More here:
Source:
https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/
NOTE: TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY. This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond. If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much.Picked By
Lemuel, -
-
Question
Lemuel
Pacman when were your missing medical records newly found? I suspect that is the hold up on a lot of us. Particularly those of us that could prove by our C files that there were missing medical records either destroyed or misfiled that were not in our files. Remands from the CAVC are supposed to go on top. Mine definitely has not.
If you received your medical records within the last 10 years, then they are wading into that 5 plus mile high pile of unscanned files the VA OIG found a few years ago. That will enable us to replace missing records and move on with our cases.
My case went to the BVA, was seen by a Judge who ignored my offer, during COVID for my brief and motions to be considered and an answering of questions by email since my computer checked out as useable for an in-home hearing but the clerk's computer would not communicate with mine through the BVA system. I would have been able to communicate with the Judge but the clerk would not have been able to listen in and feed questions.
I think the clerk engineered slamming me into AMA from legacy to get out of the work of getting those files or briefing the Judge about my claims of the files having been lost or not given to the BVA.
The Clerk was working with a file that was only 1300 pages while the RBA that went to the CAVC on appeal was over 12,000 pages. And even then the pages I listed as missing were not included. The length of the file is because of ROs copying the entire file and adding it to their decisions so they could claim the reviewed it instead of just copying the previous decision.
Because my case is on remand from the CAVC the clerk will have to not embarrass the Judge again. It means a more careful look through my brief and motions which will take time and will include an effort to obtain those missing medical records that are not in the C-file form the H-file including the unscanned hard copy records to complete the file.
My 10182 was filed on 1/31/2021. The "AMA BVA decision was on 11/29/2022. Appealed immediately to the CAVC and remanded on 10/26/2023. My case moved faster to decision because of my age and application to be expedited because of age. I do not remember the age for that request but i think it is 70. I am 83 now.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
1
1
1
Popular Days
Jun 1
2
Jun 6
1
Top Posters For This Question
Vync 1 post
Lemuel 1 post
pacmanx1 1 post
Popular Days
Jun 1 2024
2 posts
Jun 6 2024
1 post
Popular Posts
Lemuel
Pacman when were your missing medical records newly found? I suspect that is the hold up on a lot of us. Particularly those of us that could prove by our C files that there were missing medical reco
pacmanx1
I split this not to hijack the O P (Original Poster's) post. VYNC@, thanks for the update. LEMUEL@, maybe I should use the term misfiled records. In my case, over the past three years the BV
2 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now