Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

I need to Prove I went to VA when I was released in 79 and in 2010 but was denied

Rate this question


Ronald Bailey

Question

I got discharged in OCT of 79 with Hepatitis I was in the Hospital for 2 weeks, I was Discharged with Honorable Discharge I immediately to VA to file a claim they couldn't help  No Records of me being in the Hospital back then ( no computers back then) the VA was negligent what's the best way to prove I went to VA to file claim and they couldn't help because no records how convenient. I went to VA again in Phoenix AZ I could  not get Help a lot of documented Corruption that was 2010 then I went to VA again in April 2016 they filed a claim I'm very grateful its bitter sweet I couldn't help thinking i  would of got Help in 79 if my records showed up then how can i prove I went to VA back then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 12
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Moderator

Given your TBI, I humbly suggest you get serious professional help.  

You have "at least" 3 choices to consider:

1.  Get a VSO.  To do that, go to your nearest VAMC and ask for one.  They should be able to point you in the right direction.  Cost:  Zero.  However, you may not get as good of a result as the following 2 options:

2.  Contact NVLSP.  They are a Pro Bono Veterans legal assistance.  I cant answer if you meet their criteria for representation or not, discuss this with them.   Their website says they have recovered over 5 billion dollars for Veterans and never charged the Veteran a dime.  

https://www.nvlsp.org/what-we-do/lawyers-serving-warriors?gad_source=1

3.  Contact a NOVA attorney of your choice.  Most/all of these on the site below, will evaluate your situation, decide if representation is good for both of you, and not charge you anything UNTIL you receive retro.  Then, they typically charge 20 percent of back retro, but some may charge more.  https://www.vetadvocates.org/directory/widget_search?current_page=1&sort_type=featured&filter={"additional_info.show-profile-on-sustaining-membership-directory"%3A+"yes"}&asset_type=company_user&display_type=default

I have used some of the attorneys on this site.  Here are a number of law firms which have a good reputation, or that I have personally used:

1.  Carpenter Chartered.  Ken Carpenter has won many Veterans many benefits over many decades.  

2.  Glover Luck.  Julie Glover did a good job for me.   Most of my fees were paid by EAJA.  

 

3.  Attig Steele:  Chris Attig won me benefits, and I paid no fees, they were 100 percent paid by EAJA fees.  

4.  Hill and Pontoon.  They have a good reputation for helping Vets.  

5.  Bergman and Moore.. Also have a good reputation. 

6.  CCK law.  They have many attorneys, and may be the lagest firm.  They are experts at getting SMC.  

      Other firms are also good, I just picked those off the top of my head.  No offense against others that may have slipped my mind.  Stay with a NOVA firm, on the list, above.  

NOTE:  There are about 17 million or so Vetereans, and maybe less than 1000 or so attorney's who represent them.  So, you may well be turned down for representation by one or more of these "even if" you have a great case.  I have been turned down by several, and eventually sought someone else who won me benefits, so dont be discouraged with all, if the first one or two you contact is too busy to take your case.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
8 hours ago, broncovet said:

Given your TBI, I humbly suggest you get serious professional help.  

You have "at least" 3 choices to consider:

1.  Get a VSO.  To do that, go to your nearest VAMC and ask for one.  They should be able to point you in the right direction.  Cost:  Zero.  However, you may not get as good of a result as the following 2 options:

2.  Contact NVLSP.  They are a Pro Bono Veterans legal assistance.  I cant answer if you meet their criteria for representation or not, discuss this with them.   Their website says they have recovered over 5 billion dollars for Veterans and never charged the Veteran a dime.  

https://www.nvlsp.org/what-we-do/lawyers-serving-warriors?gad_source=1

3.  Contact a NOVA attorney of your choice.  Most/all of these on the site below, will evaluate your situation, decide if representation is good for both of you, and not charge you anything UNTIL you receive retro.  Then, they typically charge 20 percent of back retro, but some may charge more.  https://www.vetadvocates.org/directory/widget_search?current_page=1&sort_type=featured&filter={"additional_info.show-profile-on-sustaining-membership-directory"%3A+"yes"}&asset_type=company_user&display_type=default

I have used some of the attorneys on this site.  Here are a number of law firms which have a good reputation, or that I have personally used:

1.  Carpenter Chartered.  Ken Carpenter has won many Veterans many benefits over many decades.  

2.  Glover Luck.  Julie Glover did a good job for me.   Most of my fees were paid by EAJA.  

 

3.  Attig Steele:  Chris Attig won me benefits, and I paid no fees, they were 100 percent paid by EAJA fees.  

4.  Hill and Pontoon.  They have a good reputation for helping Vets.  

5.  Bergman and Moore.. Also have a good reputation. 

6.  CCK law.  They have many attorneys, and may be the lagest firm.  They are experts at getting SMC.  

      Other firms are also good, I just picked those off the top of my head.  No offense against others that may have slipped my mind.  Stay with a NOVA firm, on the list, above.  

NOTE:  There are about 17 million or so Vetereans, and maybe less than 1000 or so attorney's who represent them.  So, you may well be turned down for representation by one or more of these "even if" you have a great case.  I have been turned down by several, and eventually sought someone else who won me benefits, so dont be discouraged with all, if the first one or two you contact is too busy to take your case.  

 

I appreciate your advice

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Community Owner
On 7/4/2024 at 7:36 PM, Ronald Bailey said:

My Med Records are at the Eisenhower Hospital in FT Gordon GA not the VA I went to VA upon my discharge that was Honorable to file a claim which back then there was no records I went to the VA in Phoenix AZ In 2010 again they couldn't Help Me they couldn't Help Nobody Due to Massive Documented corruption that is well known in 1980 I put a written Request for my records at the NPRC in ST Louis I'm still waiting In 2016 I went to reginal office in Wichita KS thanks to Computers they finally help me file a claim now I'm Service Connected 100%  For Hepatitis  PTSD TBI and Sexual Assault which I'm Grateful for Wichita Helping Me Its Bitter Sweet because I told them my story of lost Records why would I wait till 2016 to file a claim when I was eligible upon my discharge in 79 A veteran get the Benefit of the Doubt also I was so Distraught do to my Disabilities I went to VA To get Help which I was a victim of Equitable Tolling Is why I didn't pursue My Claim every year because of the PTSD I got the Hepatitis and the TBI which I still have which was caused by the Assault

Eisenhower Hospital in FT Gordon GA is still open. TRy this link. If all else fails call them. They maybe able to tell you where to look. I am sure you are not the first Vet to ask the question.

https://eisenhower.tricare.mil/

  • Location: Second Floor, 2T-01
    Phone: (706) 787-8122
    Hours: Mon–Fri, 7:30 a.m.–4:00 p.m.

    In Accordance With AR 40-66, medical records are the property of the United States Government. It is the responsibility of the Outpatient Records Section (OPRS) to ensure that medical records are safeguarded from loss, tampering, and from unauthorized release of information. Medical records will not be hand-carried by the patient.

    The OPR provides the following services:

    • Registering new patients into electronic records system
    • In-processing foreign and NATO military personnel
    • Scanning medical documentation into The Health Artifact and Image Management Solution (HAIMS)
    • Transferring records to other Medical Treatment Facilities
    • Printing Medical Warning Tags (Allergy Tags)
    • Out- and in-processing active duty personnel, dependents, retirees, etc.
    • Providing medical records to EAMC clinics when requested

    EAMC maintains outpatient records for a period of two years after the patient's last medical encounter (excluding active duty and their dependents), after which, records are retired to the NPRC. Patients may obtain their record directly from the NPRC by visiting their homepage at http://www.archives.gov/veterans or writing to NPRC at one of the following addresses:

    Active Duty Military Records

    Service dates from October 16, 1992 through December 31, 2013:

    Department of Veteran Affairs Records Management Center
    P.O. Box 5020
    St. Louis, MO 63115

    Service dates from January 1, 2014 through the present:
    AMEDD Record Processing Center
    Records Management Center
    3370 Nacogdoches Road, Suite 116
    San Antonio, TX 78217

    Dependent Records

    NRPC (CPR)
    1411 Boulder Drive
    Valmeyer, IL 62295

    Correspondence

    Location: Second Floor, 2T-01
    Phone: (706) 787-3365 Fax: (706) 787-7211
    Hours: Mon–Fri, 7:30 a.m.–4:00 p.m.

    The Correspondence Office provides the following services:

    • Forwarding of X-rays, lab reports, EKGs
    • Preparing medical statements
    • Reproducing medical records (a release of information form is required)

    For insurance purposes, it provides information for legal requests such as MVS, subpoenas, Social Security Administration (SSA) hearings, and risk management. The Correspondence Office also processes Veteran Affairs (VA) and SSA requests and completes VA benefit forms for individuals who are disabled.

    Medical Transcriptions

    Location: Tenth Floor, Room 10A-13
    Phone: 706-787-8298
    Hours: Mon–Fri, 7:00 a.m.–4:30 p.m.
    Please call for questions regarding transcription.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

The records were probably shipped to that 5+ mile high stack that the VAOIG found that was found.  I tried to find my hard copy medical records but got no responses from the VARMCs that might have had them.  But then I went to many over the years.  Some I knew had them and transferred them to others.  Some clinics kept copies of their own records.  I discovered that when my file was lost in the 1980s.  It was rebuilt from a copy sent to California Rehabilitation and clinic copies plus new entries that had not found the file.  But there was a gap between the 1985 CA Rehab copy and the date the file disappeared.

I have been trying since 2003 to get copies through the FOIA system.  They were not provided because a "Sensitivity 7 officer" controlled them in VARMC Pittsburg.

If the contractors that got them to be scanned ever scans them we will get access to them.  Since the scanning has not been reported to have happened since the VAOIG found them, my suggestion is to follow my lead and write  to the VAOIG and see if they can locate yours in the 5+ mile high stack they found.  No response in about 5 years from VAOIG to any of my requests.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

There are supposed to be transmittal records when the files were sent.  I have not even been able to get that from any of the hospitals I was treated at.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder
Posted (edited)

pacmanx1, I recently received a notice of docketing at the BVA.  The Docket number is the same as the previous docket number.  I realize the CCK attorney that called me was talking about the SMC-T claim which came later.  Someone else at CCK may be handling the BVA appeal, including the 1151 claim and appeal.  Or it may not be being handled at all.  Will try to find out Monday and report back.  If CCK limited what they were handling to SMC as the CCK Team Leader told me, then I do not have a representative at the BVA.  Only at VARMC and VARO for SMC is the way I read it.  

Anyone see it differently?

Based upon the above and the necessity to get the complete records of my West LA VARMC Seizure Clinic and Spine Clinic, I went to @broncovet''s NVLSP link:  https://www.nvlsp.org/what-we-do/lawyers-serving-warriors?gad_source=1 and filled out the forms for representation on this issue and the "shotgun issues" remanded from the CAVC which CCK may not be handling according to the CCK team leader's statements to me on the phone.  If they check with CCK and find the CCK team does not want to handle the "shot gun appeal" created by the 05/11/2017 BVA Decision remands that were not addressed and other claims that developed in the meantime, plus my past BVA Decision request for reopening under 38 CFR 20.1000, then maybe I will have to take the issues one at a time and ask the CAVC to remand them for fact finding at the only fact finder, the BVA.

My BVA appeal includes a 1994 next of friend claim, allowed at the time, for veterans with organic brain syndromes from TBI and Cerebral Malaria that was ignored and never developed while my two representative claimants were granted 100% P&T PTSD to remove them from the consideration.  But that should not work.  They should still have the causative issues open if they can be found and are not deceased.  

Included the link to this thread on my NVLSP request for addressing this issue as a class action and my BVA case if CCK is not going to do it as the Lead Attorney told me.

Edited by Lemuel
left out definitive phrases
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use