Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Pending Claims Doctrine

Rate this question


1776Marine

Question

  Claim filed 1979, was never adjudicated, under the Pending Claims Doctrine, would filing a claim for a CUE ( Clear Undeniable Error) be in order, considering that the RO sent a request to appear for a C&P examination and the RO sent it to the wrong address, claim was denied on basis of not appearing for that C&P examination which, this Veteran was never properly notified? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Moderator

Examples of situations that are not clear and unmistakable error

(1) Changed diagnosis. A new medical diagnosis that “corrects” an earlier diagnosis considered in a Board decision.

(2) Duty to assist. The Secretary's failure to fulfill the duty to assist.

(3) Evaluation of evidence. A disagreement as to how the facts were weighed or evaluated.

(e) Change in interpretation. Clear and unmistakable error does not include the otherwise correct application of a statute or regulation where, subsequent to the Board decision challenged, there has been a change in the interpretation of the statute or regulation.

eCFR :: 38 CFR 20.1403 -- Rule 1403. What constitutes clear and unmistakable error; what does not.

My intentions are to help, my advice maybe wrong, be your own advocate and know what is in your C-File and the 38 CFR that governs your disabilities and conditions.

Do your own homework. No one knows the veteran’s symptoms like the veteran. Never Give Up.

I do not give my consent for anyone to view my personal VA records.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator
Posted (edited)

Welcome to haidt!

The VA has "an unlimited period of time" to adjuticate your claim.  Sadly, IMHO, this probably does not meet CUE standard of review, since there was no decision, how can you attack that decision?

But, all is not lost!  There are other, probably better ways of doing this.  The first way is to file a supplemental claim, citing the 1979 application, or even dont cite it.  You may have to fight for your effective date, but, with the claim still pending, you should eventually win, (your effective date back to 1979) once you get SC for the condition applied.  

Have you subsequently gotten SC?  

If you have been, but at the wrong effective date, then file a nod disputing the effective date. 

Still another way of doing this, other than filing a supplemental claim (or, in addition to filing supplemental claim) is to inquire as to the status of the 1979 claim, but be sure you have your ducks in a row, as VA is likely to disavow such a claim.  Frankly, its likely that it was shredded or otherwise mishandled.  

It may not be too early for you to consider getting help from a lawyer from NOVA, depending on your situation and circumstances.  Generally, lawyers wont/cant represent you until/unless you have at least one denial.  Again, there are ways, however.  

Once such method is to file a writ of mandamus to compel VA to adjutciate said application from 1979, but that is down the road and you are not ready for that yet.  You would need to "set the stage" for a writ, such as asking VA the status of your 1979 claim, and waiting for their response.  A writ is the last resort, and you need to try everything else first, and there are many things for you to try first.  The retro potential back to 1979 is massive and a game changer.  Depending upon the severity of your disabilities, this could be a half million dollars or more of retro potential.  

https://www.vetadvocates.org/directory/widget_search?current_page=1&sort_type=featured&filter={"additional_info.show-profile-on-sustaining-membership-directory"%3A+"yes"}&asset_type=company_user&display_type=default

By the way, the VA tried this same BS with me, I eventually won benefits back to the original effective date, but they fought me the whole way.  It was a sweet victory.  And, yes, I had to get a lawyer..several times, since VA fought me time after time, at each step of the way.  Its the way VA does this.  

Since I have not reviewed your file, I can not answer definately, what is the best route to go.  There may be other ways, that would take a review of your cfile, to handle this.  Are you SC, what percent, and when was it awarded?  

You can contact pretty much any of the lawyers in the link above, and one or more will likely advise you what to do.  Some may offer representation, others may decline.  I dont recommed you dropping this.  Keep fighting.  VA is likely gonna fight you every step of the way, but if you keep going, you should win.  

In regard to effective dates, the "date of claim" is only "half" the equation.  The other half is "facts found".  (This means the doc says you were disabled).  The effective date is the later of the date of claim or facts found.  So, if a doctor stated "you did not become disabled" in 1979, but not until July, 2024, then you could only get one month retro.  

Its all complicated and we would need much more information to give you better advice, I just listed a few of your options.  

Since I dont know your medical history or cfile. military history, I have to guess at what is your best options.  The one thing, however, is clear: 

YOU SHOULD FIGHT FOR the  BENEFITS  you deserve AND NEVER GIVE UP.   These benefits can extend to your family, too, even after you die.  (such as DIC, or DEA).  

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

If you have not already done so, put in a request for your claims folder. It will take a while to receive it, but at least you can go through everything page by page to see what the VA actually did do.

A CUE might be an option though, just my unofficial opinion. As mentioned, a "duty to assist error" is generally not a CUE. Those happen when the VA was supposed to help do something, but just did not do it. However, if you can locate the initial C&P notification letter, take a look at the TO address. See if it was addressed to you at your address at the time. If it was sent to someone else or an incorrect address, that -might- qualify as an actual error. After I went through my claims folder, I found several pieces of correspondence that were for other vets. I mailed those back to the VA. CUE must also have a potential benefit, which in this case would be the benefits of being SC, increased ratings, or whatever you filed for. Also, keep in mind the address might have been correct, but the error could have been on the part of the postal service. The VA believes in the Presumption of Regularity which means that government employees are assumed to have done their job properly, but we all know mistakes happen every day. It the address was correct, then the VA would probably deny CUE.

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Community Owner
On 8/10/2024 at 7:44 AM, broncovet said:

Welcome to haidt!

The VA has "an unlimited period of time" to adjuticate your claim.  Sadly, IMHO, this probably does not meet CUE standard of review, since there was no decision, how can you attack that decision?

But, all is not lost!  There are other, probably better ways of doing this.  The first way is to file a supplemental claim, citing the 1979 application, or even dont cite it.  You may have to fight for your effective date, but, with the claim still pending, you should eventually win, (your effective date back to 1979) once you get SC for the condition applied.  

Have you subsequently gotten SC?  

If you have been, but at the wrong effective date, then file a nod disputing the effective date. 

------

Once such method is to file a writ of mandamus to compel VA to adjutciate said application from 1979, but that is down the road and you are not ready for that yet.  You would need to "set the stage" for a writ, such as asking VA the status of your 1979 claim, and waiting for their response.  A writ is the last resort, and you need to try everything else first, and there are many things for you to try first.  The retro potential back to 1979 is massive and a game changer.  Depending upon the severity of your disabilities, this could be a half million dollars or more of retro potential.  

https://www.vetadvocates.org/directory/widget_search?current_page=1&sort_type=featured&filter={"additional_info.show-profile-on-sustaining-membership-directory"%3A+"yes"}&asset_type=company_user&display_type=default

By the way, the VA tried this same BS with me, I eventually won benefits back to the original effective date, but they fought me the whole way.  It was a sweet victory.  And, yes, I had to get a lawyer..several times, since VA fought me time after time, at each step of the way.  Its the way VA does this.  

---

On 8/13/2024 at 7:23 PM, Vync said:

If you have not already done so, put in a request for your claims folder. It will take a while to receive it, but at least you can go through everything page by page to see what the VA actually did do.

A CUE might be an option though, just my unofficial opinion. As mentioned, a "duty to assist error" is generally not a CUE. Those happen when the VA was supposed to help do something, but just did not do it. However, if you can locate the initial C&P notification letter, take a look at the TO address. See if it was addressed to you at your address at the time. If it was sent to someone else or an incorrect address, that -might- qualify as an actual error. After I went through my claims folder, I found several pieces of correspondence that were for other vets. I mailed those back to the VA. CUE must also have a potential benefit, which in this case would be the benefits of being SC, increased ratings, or whatever you filed for. Also, keep in mind the address might have been correct, but the error could have been on the part of the postal service. The VA believes in the Presumption of Regularity which means that government employees are assumed to have done their job properly, but we all know mistakes happen every day. It the address was correct, then the VA would probably deny CUE.

I agree with broncovet in that I do not think it raises to a CUE Claim standard as you have no denial letter. I agree with Vync that you should request your C-File it can take 6 to 9 months. You should find in your C-File the original claim application and any other doc's that you filed with it. The VA tried (and is still trying) to say that I never filed a claim in 1981.  But because I had my C-File I was able to pull there documents that proved it. I am still working on the EED.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder
1 hour ago, Rattler said:

I agree with broncovet in that I do not think it raises to a CUE Claim standard as you have no denial letter. I agree with Vync that you should request your C-File it can take 6 to 9 months. You should find in your C-File the original claim application and any other doc's that you filed with it. The VA tried (and is still trying) to say that I never filed a claim in 1981.  But because I had my C-File I was able to pull there documents that proved it. I am still working on the EED.

I'll add to what @Rattler said.
  First, the VA has an online option for you to supposedly download/view your decision letters at https://news.va.gov/116268/view-download-va-decision-letters-online. The reason why I said "supposedly" is because I went and checked mine and found some were incomplete and others missing outright. You might get lucky and find what you need.
  Second, if it is not online, if you are signed on (i.e. POA'd) with an accredited agent or VSO, you can ask them to go into the system and see if they can find that denial letter. They should be able to print it and provide it to you. 

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use