Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Seeing The C-file / Obtaining Copies

Rate this question


free_spirit_etc

Question

I called the VA today (Chicago RO) about seeing my husband's C-file --and getting copies of a few of the documents.

I was told to see the C-file I need to write a request for an appointment -and it will take about 6 months.

The same for getting copies of any documents. -- write a request and wait 6 months.

I told her my husband had requested these documents LAST summer. She checked his file status and said the status is "Privacy" - which meas it IS in the process of having the documents copied - and that I should receive them in 30 days.

Does this seem accurate -- Would they still send copies of the documents requested if his case has been closed due to his death without me filing another request?

Does it generally take 6 months just to be able to get an appointment to see your C-file.

I am particularly interested in getting a copy of his discharge physical -- as he didn't seem to have a copy. We even sent in a separate request for that -- as a limited request - hoping to get it quicker.

The National Records Center say they don't have copies of his medical records - since they are at the VA.

Do they ever go back to the Records Center? Or when you file a VA claim - does that mean your records live at the VA?

It seems like the Records Center could just send COPIES of your SMRs -- so they wouldn't be held hostage when you need them...

Free

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Free - six months sounds about right but it depends on the work load of your VARO. I am no legal expert but I assume that since the privacy act request was in place they still have to comply with it. As far as the records are concerned the reason for the records center sending the originals to VA is that since the VA is really the only activity that needs the med recs then it clears space at the personnel center for other valauble service records. It should be common practice for the VA to retire the C File to a VA records holding area, if such a place exists, at a specified time after the death of a vet (providing no action has been taken by the spouse for accrued benefits or DIC claims (don't really know so I am just guessing on this one).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Ricky. It seemed like a long time to me. I hope they go ahead and process the request my husband sent then -- so I don't have to start over on the time frame.

I am also wondering - they say for accrued benefits they make the decision on the information in the file at the time of death. I know they also assume the SMRs are IN the file - whether they are in the file or not. (i.e. if you later discover a SMR that should have been in the file, but wasn't - it is added to the list of what was IN the file)

Does anyone know if this also applies to OTHER information that you have informed the VA of -- that they should have obtained? --If you let them know that other agencies had records that needed to be obtained -- and THEY did not obtain them --can that information still be considered as being IN the file at the time of death if obtained later.

For instance -- the VA had denied my husband was exposed to asbestos -- as he wasn't part of an occupational screening. We had informed the VA that the Air Force did not even START medical screening for asbestos until AFTER my husband was no longer an electrician. The first regualtion WE found was for several years later.

Now - if the VA was made aware that such a document existed -- (like it would be a surprise to them) --and they had not obtained it - can it still be added and conisdered part of the record? Or can they not consider it part of the record at his death when they did not obtain it?

Personally, I think they SHOULD know when the screening programs started. Because of the time lag in asbesots related illness -- the VETS that are now being affected by asbestos were often exposed BEFORE any screening programs (or safety measures) were in place. Also the PELS changed significantly over time -- so what used to be considered safe is now outlawed.

So for them to just be able to say "you weren't part of an occupational screening" when the military did not even IMPLEMENT such programs until later -- seems a bit unfair.

So I think - like the PIES --they SHOULD have a record of when the safety programs began --as this could affect a lot of vets.

Free

Free - six months sounds about right but it depends on the work load of your VARO. I am no legal expert but I assume that since the privacy act request was in place they still have to comply with it. As far as the records are concerned the reason for the records center sending the originals to VA is that since the VA is really the only activity that needs the med recs then it clears space at the personnel center for other valauble service records. It should be common practice for the VA to retire the C File to a VA records holding area, if such a place exists, at a specified time after the death of a vet (providing no action has been taken by the spouse for accrued benefits or DIC claims (don't really know so I am just guessing on this one).
Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Free - sorry but my interpertation of the regulation is it really means in the file at the time of death. Eventhough they were aware of records and had truly taken the action required to obtain them they can not be added after the death. It is unfair and a disgrace but that is my take (opinion). One would think that if a SMR is found or records already exist (not new imo's that you asked for after the death) the law would allow the addition to the file. However, the way they twist and turn in applying the laws and regulations I am sure they will not allow anything to be added.

Maybe Berta or Bob or Pete or etc..... will come along and provide a different interpertation of the regulation for they know much more than I about VA law. I am just a baby compared to them (not age wise).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use