Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Accrued Benefits

Rate this question


free_spirit_etc

Question

I was reading through my husband's VA claims in my spare time.... :rolleyes: And I have a question.

When we were arguing his cancer claim -- we noticed other claims that we think SHOULD have been granted. It was recommended not to reopen or claim a CUE on them until we were done with the cancer claim.. as it could pull his c-file in all different directions.

When he died this February - the only open claim he had was for the cancer.

In regard to accrued benefits -- would the only way I could present the other claims be a CUE?

There are 3 claims:

1. Right shoulder injury -- which was claimed on his original claim at retirement (1998) in which they did find something wrong with his shoulder -- but denied the claim (RO and BVA) based on the fact his SMR did not show treatment. They said he didn't have a Nexus either -- though I am not sure what type of nexus they think you should have when you claim the disability UPON discharge --after 28 years of service. But they said there was no nexus showing that the disability the found in his right shoulder during his initial C&P exam was related to the disability he claimed at retirement. We still haven't gotten a copy of his discharge physical --to see if the right shoulder is listed on that -- but wouldn't that be a Service Medical Record. I am assuming it WOULD be listed -- as he claimed it with the VA on retirement. Could this be a CUE (presumed soundness?) --and is that the only way I could persue the claim?

2. Cervical strain - He also claimed this on retirement. SMR listed cervicle strain -- but they couldn't find a current disability --( C&P 1999 )He appealed and 2002 C&P DID find a bit of damage at C-3 c-4 -- but wasn't considered disabling enough to warrant a "current disability" (even at 0 %) -- And the VA examiner stated my husband claimed it was service related --but that the c-file didn't show that it was -- (I have no idea how he came up with this) and stated he didn't think the current nondisabling disability was connected in etioligy to the service. Then the 2003 exam he had for headaches on a Desert Storm C&P stated his headaches were CAUSED by his cervical strain c-3 c-4 --(therefore not service connected -- as they were diagnosed.

Again, when you have a neck injury in SMR -- and claim for cervical pain on retirement -- and then your neck keeps hurting -- and they keep finding that the condition is worse -- it sure looks like a nexus to me.

So could this be a CUE? - or could it be considered an INFORMAL claim to reopen cervical strain that was never adjudicated (in 2003)--and as such would STILL be pending at his death?

3. Chronic Sinutitis (yes..I saw the other thread on this). On the headache claim the examiner also stated some of his headaches were caused by chronic sinus infections -- and the examiner also noted he had several incidences in service - and that his in service x-rays had diagnosed chronic sinustitis (both SMR and C&P designated the ethmoid sinuses). Again --would this be a cue? Is that the only way it could be raised for accrued benefits? or could it be a pending informal claim for Sinus Problems -- since the VA only addressed that his headaches couldn't be granted SC because they had been diagnosed and therefore were not related to Desert Storm Illness.

Kind of odd -- Your headaches can not be Service Connected because they are caused by

1. a chronic sinus condition that was diagnosed in the service and treated repeatedly

2, the cervical strain that is in your SMRs and that you have been telling us has been hurting you since your discharge from active duty

Therefore -- we deny you service connection...

???

Free

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 13
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

I do NOT qualify for Death PENSION:

A surviving spouse may qualify for pension, compensation, or dependency and indemnity compensation if the marriage to the veteran occurred before or during his or her service or, if married to him or her after his or her separation from service, before the applicable date stated in his section.

(a) Pension. Death pension may be paid to a surviving spouse who was married to the veteran:

(1) One year or more prior to the veteran's death, or

(2) For any period of time if a child was born of the marriage, or was born to them before the marriage, or

(3) Prior to the applicable delimiting dates, as follows:

(i) Civil War—June 27, 1905.

(ii) Indian wars—March 4, 1917.

(iii) Spanish-American War—January 1, 1938.

(iv) Mexican border period and World War I—December 14, 1944.

(v) World War II—January 1, 1957.

(vi) Korean conflict—February 1, 1965.

(vii) Vietnam era—May 8, 1985.

(viii) Persian Gulf War—January 1, 2001.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 532(d), 534©, 536©, 541(e), 541(f))

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use