Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules
- 0
-
Tell a friend
-
Recent Achievements
-
Our picks
-
Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
Tbird posted a record in VA Claims and Benefits Information,
Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL
This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:
Current Diagnosis. (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)
In-Service Event or Aggravation.
Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”-
- 0 replies
Picked By
Tbird, -
-
Post in ICD Codes and SCT CODES?WHAT THEY MEAN?
Timothy cawthorn posted an answer to a question,
Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability ratingPicked By
yellowrose, -
-
Post in Chevron Deference overruled by Supreme Court
broncovet posted a post in a topic,
VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.
They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.
This is not true,
Proof:
About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because when they cant work, they can not keep their home. I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason: "Its been too long since military service". This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA. And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time, mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends.
Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly. The VA is broken.
A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals. I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision. All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did.
I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt". Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day? Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.Picked By
Lemuel, -
-
Post in Re-embursement for non VA Medical care.
broncovet posted an answer to a question,
Welcome to hadit!
There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not. Try reading this:
https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/
However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.
When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait! Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?" Not once. Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.
However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.
That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot. There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.
Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.
Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344
Picked By
Lemuel, -
-
Post in What is the DIC timeline?
broncovet posted an answer to a question,
Good question.
Maybe I can clear it up.
The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more. (my paraphrase).
More here:
Source:
https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/
NOTE: TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY. This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond. If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much.Picked By
Lemuel, -
-
Question
Berta
This topic was moved and I could not find it to reply directly to it-
A Writ of Mandamus is a petition to the US Court of Veterans Appeals -usually to have them take action to get your claim decided faster.
BUT- you have to have exhausted every potential thing you could do- to get action on your claim.
I filed a Writ of Mandamus many years ago that was denied by the Court- but I sent to RO a copy of it and
at the same time I was actively pressuring the RO to read my medical evidence.I did receive those awards but I have no idea if the mandamus helped at all.
I am preparing another Writ of MAndamus- their are quidelines at the CAVC web site that must be followed in preparing this legal document.
Make sure you ask them to waive the filing fees-they usually always do that-
I have a better standing for a writ now then I did 10 years ago-
Maybe this will show what I mean--
I filed a claim involving a legal issue in January 2003.
The legal issue grew out of the recent Bonny V. Principi decision.Then the VA developed regs on this widow's claim that forgot an allowance for consideration of Sec 1151 widows under the Bonny regs.
I challenged that.
The Buffalo RO VSM stated in mail twice since 2003 that I would receive an administrative decision.
I never received a VCAA letter on this and no decision ever came.
I wrote to General Counsel asking them to opine on this as a legal question.
They wrote back that without any direction from the RO and without my receipt of any decision at all-they had no jurisdiction.
This claim is among my other claims that a rater has now.
They said a decision is pending on all of them.
If the decision again fails to include this claim re: Bonny V Principi- I will file a Writ of Mandamus as this would show that over 4 years have passed and the VA has failled to decide the claim at all.
I can show the court that I took steps to get the OGC to decide the legal aspect and they couldnt. Also I can show the court a copy of letter I sent to the VA -Regulations Division-
asking that this reg be amended to include all Section 1151 widows and widowers.
I dont know the outcome of that yet.
My long point is -a Writ of Mandamus has nothing to do with merits of a claim or evidence.
Writs can compel to VA to take steps that the claimant has exhausted in attempting to get a decision.
(Snyder V Gober, Bates V. Nicholson.)
Writs can also force VA to comply with expeditious treatment .(Vargas V Gonzales V Principi)
The format at the CAVC web site must be followed in preparing a writ.
You must tell the court what steps you have taken to rectify the problem.
Your argument must be "compelling" Erspamer V. Derwinski
Your argument must be based on establlished VA case law- (Bates V. Nicholson -forcing the RO to issue a SOC)
You must have exhausted all other avenues of rectifying the situation and be able to prove to the court what steps you have taken.
The writ should be short and to the point.
I suggest to anyone considering this action to purchase the VBM and read carefully their info on Writs.
Or go to the CAVC web site and read Writs there.
99 % of these writs fails- yet if they are preared properly they can get the RO to move.
Send a copy of the writ to the RO also.
GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !
When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief
Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was
simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."
Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
1
1
Popular Days
May 2
2
Top Posters For This Question
Pete53 1 post
Berta 1 post
Popular Days
May 2 2007
2 posts
1 answer to this question
Recommended Posts