Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

What Specifically Is A Service Record

Rate this question


free_spirit_etc

Question

Where the rules say that any service records that are not in the claim file are later discovered / submitted -- they will be considered to have been IN the claim file at the date of the decision.

So I am basically getting that if the VA was supposed to get records from the military and did not get them - if they get them later -- and you are filing a CUE, or accrued benefits claim -- where it is important to establish that those records WERE in the claim file previously -- the decision must be made AS IF they WERE in the claim file on that date, even if they were not.

Now I know the VA tends to act like SMR are the ONLY records that matter. But if the rule is Service Records - would this also apply to OTHER records on the veteran (military records) and other records obtained from the military (like asbestos reports, programs in place, etc.)If the VA had been put on notice that such records exist -- if such records are NOT in the claim file - but later added - can they be considered a Service Record which is presumed to have been IN the claim file at an earlier date?

Free

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Service records do extend beyond just service medical records. They basically are any records maintained by the service department (Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, Coast Guard, etc.) and could also be what are most also referred to as service personnel records. These could be deployment or TDY orders (such as the case with a veteran going to Vietnam) or CID investigation reports (such as when a rape or sexual assault takes place in service) or even award orders showing the veteran received a Combat Action Ribbon (potentially pertinent in establishing service connection for PTSD or other disabilities attributable to combat).

These would not represent a CUE though since they were not of record in the claims folder at the time a decision was made. So in these cases the regulations allow for them to take corrective action based on the receipt or obtaining service records later on down the road.

Edited by theotherguy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Yeah, what that other guy just said. ;)

"It is cold and we have no blankets.

The little children are freezing to death.

My people, some of them, have run away to the hills, and have no blankets, no food; no one knows where they are-perhaps freezing to death.

I want to have time to look for my children and see how many of them I can find.

Maybe I shall find them among the dead.

Hear me, my chiefs! I am tired; my heart is sick and sad.

From where the sun now stands, I will fight no more forever."

Chief Joseph

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A further example is when I was filing my own claim in 2002, I filed for IVDS. It was denied because I had not proven that I was incapacitated for enough time.... I realized that all my convalescent leave records were in my 201 file, and just barely mentioned in my medical record. I pulled and copied them, resubmitted as a NOD with new and material evidence and got the IVDS rating I was looking for.

Further, performance evaluation, Article 15's, Captains Mast records can all be helpful in certain claims if you are trying to prove a PATTERN of miscondunduct associated with say PTSD, or some other mental disorder....

So, ALL military records are submittable as evidence. They can and do often make a great deal of difference....

Edited by sixthscents

Bob Smith

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bob--- GREAT advice-

The disciplinary action reports were the main thing that proved nexus for a vet friend of mine. (In service mental illness)

Also Personnel records can help support an inservice injury if the Duty was changed to light duty etc- due to the accident or injury.

I know a few former Corpmen-

even under combat scenarios they tried to document everything-

There is nothing better than having the actual SMRs-

I never depend on what VA says is in them or not in them.

Old SMRs- you might have to scan and keep blowing them up- even read them in a mirror- etc-and ask for others to see what they seem to say-

but it is well worth the time it takes to pour over them good.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use