Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Proving In Service Connection

Rate this question


hayley3

Question

They say in the denial that I failed to relate the arthritis condition to the service connected condition.

How can I show them that it is connected? What concrete evidence are they looking for? It almost seems like they didn't read anything I said.

This is what I typed up:

Timeline of disease history:

Cervicitis (treated in service) Symptom of reactive arthritis

Hemorrhagic Cystitis (treated in service) Symptom of reactive arthritis

Salpingitis infection (PID) resulting from the cervicitis/cystitis: Symptom of reactive arthritis (treated in service and service connected)

Acute knee pain (treated in service) Symptom of reactive arthritis

Back pain (sacroiliac arthritis) Result of reactive arthritis or inflammatory bowel disease.

I don't have the symptoms of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) nor did I have an intestinal infection prior to the arthritis which is what causes IBD.

But like I said, my Dr was a jerk. The resident said it was reactive arthritis but the Attending? said it could be either Reactive or (IBD). I had a colonoscopy which should have ruled out the inflammatory bowel disease(IBD) because they found nothing but a polyp.

Anyway, I just thought I'd pass this by someone who may have some ideas. I think they didn't do their job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 23
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

"Timeline of disease history:

Cervicitis (treated in service) Symptom of reactive arthritis

Did you provide information relating to SMR's -- copies of SMR's would be good.

Hemorrhagic Cystitis (treated in service) Symptom of reactive arthritis.

My same opinion goes here.

Salpingitis infection (PID) resulting from the cervicitis/cystitis: Symptom of reactive arthritis (treated in service and service connected)

What percentage of service connection did VA grant for this disability ?

Acute knee pain (treated in service) Symptom of reactive arthritis

Did you provide information relating to SMR's -- copies of SMR's would be good.

Back pain (sacroiliac arthritis) Result of reactive arthritis or inflammatory bowel disease.

Medical doctor will need to provide a nexus.

I don't have the symptoms of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) nor did I have an intestinal infection prior to the arthritis which is what causes IBD."

Medical doctor will need to provide a nexus.

Research sites for you:

38 CFR - Part 3 - Adjudication

http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-...fr3_main_02.tpl

38 CFR - Part 4 - Schedule of Rating Disabilities

http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-...fr4_main_02.tpl

M21-1MR

http://www.warms.vba.va.gov/M21_1MR.html

Hope this helps a vet.

carlie

Edited by carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"They say in the denial that I failed to relate the arthritis condition to the service connected condition.

How can I show them that it is connected? What concrete evidence are they looking for?"

You need to copy and highlight for them the SMRs that show:

Salpingitis infection (PID) resulting from the cervicitis/cystitis: Symptom of reactive arthritis

(treated in service and service connected)

They probably dont know exactly what reactive arthritis is:

http://www.medicinenet.com/reactive_arthritis/article.htm

Are you able to afford an Independent medical opinion?

In the underlined statement of the VCAA letter they sent you- what did they specifically ask for regarding the reactive arthritis claim?

Is this condition noted on your discharge physical also?

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"It almost seems like they didn't read anything I said."

Veteran I just went through 5 years of VA BS- all of the claims filed and all the stuff that went with them and all of the SOCs and denial letters (a copy of my C file)

I found right in the c file something the VA said they didnt have- yeah right-

I just said the very same thing to myself!

The VA in initial letters for each claim NEVER gave me the right decision and never read the evidence until I got tough.This involved DIC as well as Chapter 35 and other

stuff.

I won all of those claims ----still I have years and years of VA BS here- and some of the denials were extraordinary.and very creative.

and all were blatantly wrong.

I even filed for an Administrative Review in VA Central in DC at one point.

The VA lawyer called me up within days- he said they never get these requests -he only saw one before mine and it was from a VA employee-and he wondered why I filed it-

and I said because VACO has lawyers and lawyers know how to read.

I could not find anyone at the Buffalo RO who seemed to have that ability.

Well long story-I won that one too-

but I noticed that-in many submissions of my evidence on these older claims- someone at VA had highlighted part of the statement but failed to address the medical evidence it reffered to at all.

I knew the c file had what VA said recently wasnt there but I took the time to check it anyhow- and I hope this encourages someone-

denial after denial, fight after fight, considerable overwhelming evidence----

and years later the war of the words was over.

The evidence that they listed in the initial denials never changed-it was all in the veteran's medical records-

but it took them years to read it.

That is why Persistence as well as evidence is the name of the VA game.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have none of my service medical records. But they have copies.

What exactly do you mean the medical doctor will need to provide a nexus. I know that nexus means link. I'm assuming you're saying that, no matter what's in my records, if the Dr doesn't come out and say it, it means nothing. :blink:

Thanks

"Timeline of disease history:

Cervicitis (treated in service) Symptom of reactive arthritis

Did you provide information relating to SMR's -- copies of SMR's would be good.

Hemorrhagic Cystitis (treated in service) Symptom of reactive arthritis.

My same opinion goes here.

Salpingitis infection (PID) resulting from the cervicitis/cystitis: Symptom of reactive arthritis (treated in service and service connected)

What percentage of service connection did VA grant for this disability ?

Acute knee pain (treated in service) Symptom of reactive arthritis

Did you provide information relating to SMR's -- copies of SMR's would be good.

Back pain (sacroiliac arthritis) Result of reactive arthritis or inflammatory bowel disease.

Medical doctor will need to provide a nexus.

I don't have the symptoms of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) nor did I have an intestinal infection prior to the arthritis which is what causes IBD."

Medical doctor will need to provide a nexus.

Research sites for you:

38 CFR - Part 3 - Adjudication

http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-...fr3_main_02.tpl

38 CFR - Part 4 - Schedule of Rating Disabilities

http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-...fr4_main_02.tpl

M21-1MR

http://www.warms.vba.va.gov/M21_1MR.html

Hope this helps a vet.

carlie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I forgot to say I'm 50% sc for a hysterectomy because of the PID/cervicitis.

I sent them tons of information on reactive arthritis (maybe too much)

Rheumatologists are very expensive and this is an immune disorder and I don't have insurance. I was so sick in 2000 that I had to quit my job and I worked for the VA hospital! I am raising a child on very little money.

I don't know what a VCAA is. But the only thing I remember them asking for is the addresses and phone numbers of all the physicians I had seen when I had insurance. I wouldn't know if it is on my discharge physical. My discharge was in 1982 and that's why this is so hard for them because it's been so long since it started.

They also said that the MRI failed to provide a diagnosis but they did the MRI of the wrong area.

Thanks!

"They say in the denial that I failed to relate the arthritis condition to the service connected condition.

How can I show them that it is connected? What concrete evidence are they looking for?"

You need to copy and highlight for them the SMRs that show:

Salpingitis infection (PID) resulting from the cervicitis/cystitis: Symptom of reactive arthritis

(treated in service and service connected)

They probably dont know exactly what reactive arthritis is:

http://www.medicinenet.com/reactive_arthritis/article.htm

Are you able to afford an Independent medical opinion?

In the underlined statement of the VCAA letter they sent you- what did they specifically ask for regarding the reactive arthritis claim?

Is this condition noted on your discharge physical also?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hayley3,

A doctor who specializes in your particular medical problem needs to examine you AND your inservice medical records so the doctor can establish, on paper, the most probable CAUSE of your medical condition and WHEN it was first treated and HOW the inservice medical condition is directly related to your present medical condition.

The inservice medical condition has to be connected to your present medical condition through the opinion of a true expert within that particular medical specialty.

The opinion should be as short as possible so the person reading it at the VA doesn't get bored.

It needs to spell out in plain language why the medical condition is directly connected to your service.

The doctor has to list his qualifications.

If you can supply supportive statements to back up your service connection contentions, from friends and/or relatives, be sure to have their signatures notorized and dated.

Then be prepared for a stupid denial that does not reflect the actual facts as they existed at the time that you submitted them to the VA.

sledge

Those that need help the most are the ones least likely to receive help from the VA.

It's up to us to help each other.

sledge twkelly@hotmail.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use