Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

P&t Pernanent & Total Disability

Rate this question


Charleese

Question

Hi,

I know that P&T stands for Permanent & Total Disability, but what does this really mean? Do you have to be rated at 100% to get P&T? Do you have to be unemploye to get P&T? Are there certain injuries that you have to have to get P&T. If your 100% do you have to request P&T or do they automatically give it to you?

Thanks in advance for your answers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 28
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

IF YOU ARE P&T FOR PTSD YOU BETTER KEEP UP ON YOUR TREATMENT. KEEP GETTING YOUR MEDS EVEN IF YOU DONT TAKE THEM. KEEP SEEING YOUR DOC. THE VA IS GOING TO LOOK TO CUT MONEY SOMEWERE. AND PTSD IS THE EASIEST TO PURSUE SO IF ONE DAY THEY DO A REVIEW AND THEY SEE YOU ARE NOT GETTING TREATMENT OR HAVE NOT SEEN A DOCTOR FOR AWHILE I CAN BET THEY WILL BE CALLING YOU BACK IN FOR A REVIEW. SEE YOUR DOC ALEAST ONCE EVERY 3 MONTHS AND KEEP UP ON YOUR MEDS. AND KEEP COPYS AND GET COPYS EVERY TIME YOU SEE YOUR SHRINK. I AGREE THAT SEEING MY SHRINK DOES NOTHING TO HELP MY PTSD BUT THE VA DOES NOT CARE WHAT I THINK. ALSO IF YOU ARE ON SSD OR SSI YOU WILL HAVE A REVIEW OF YOUR CASE AND YOU BETTER HAVE SOME DOCTOR PROGESS NOTES. DONT EVER THINK JUST BECUASE YOU HAVE P&T THEY ARE NEVER GOING TO CALL YOU BACK. YOU BETTER BE READY AND HAVE ALL YOUR DUCKS IN LINE. YOU FOUGHT HARD TO WIN YOUR CLAIM NOW YOU MUST FIGHT TO KEEP IT. NEVER, NEVER, NEVER, TRUST THE VA TO DO THE RIGHT THING. BE PREPARED.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jay,

Please post the regulation and where in the regulation you quoting when you state that the VA ordering a C&P exam after you're rated P&T is illegal. Thanks.

Thanks,

ts

Says so in 3.327 and it has be said numerous times by the BVA, CAVC and was recently said to congress by the VA's top brass. On top of that, it just doesn't make ANY sense. Perhaps one can argue that the VA has been too liberal with the designation, but that should mean they should become more strict about handing it out; not going around the law because they think they screwed up.

Permanent means permanent...it doesn't mean kinda permanent or sorta permanent. If you don't offer them ANY reason to look at your file (IE - some form of new and material evidence) they have NO right to reopen your claim. But, they've gotten away with it in the past and SOs don't seem to object to it when they do....what I hear most is, "well, what do you have to hide", which completely misses the point.

Calnight,

One can argue that the medical record you've compiled is what can lead to them reopening your P&T case. If you have ONE good day, the RO can use that as justification for "new and material evidence" regardless of the overall disability picture....it is a way out of the regulations that they can use to protect themselves in ordering a C&P.

If you are seeing a civilian psychiatrist and they try to order a C&P, first fight the appointment, then send in an eval from your civilian doc if you're pressed. The laws are VERY clear on lowering 100% and P&T cases.....they need a lot of evidence to get away with it (not saying they wont try though).

Edited by Jay Johnson
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not one to get in the middle of things, but I read and reread the reg for reexaminiations. Here it is:

§3.327 Reexaminations.

(a) General. Reexaminations, including periods of hospital observation, will be requested whenever VA determines there is a need to verify either the continued existence or the current severity of a disability. Generally, reexaminations will be required if it is likely that a disability has improved, or if evidence indicates there has been a material change in a disability or that the current rating may be incorrect. Individuals for whom reexaminations have been authorized and scheduled are required to report for such reexaminations. Paragraphs (b) and © of this section provide general guidelines for requesting reexaminations, but shall not be construed as limiting VA’s authority to request reexaminations, or periods of hospital observation, at any time in order to ensure that a disability is accurately rated. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(a))

(b) Compensation cases:

(1) Scheduling reexaminations. Assignment of a prestabilization rating requires reexamination within the second 6 months period following separation from service. Following initial Department of Veterans Affairs examination, or any scheduled future or other examination, reexamination, if in order, will be scheduled within not less than 2 years nor more than 5 years within the judgment of the rating board, unless another time period is elsewhere specified.

(2) No periodic future examinations will be requested. In service-connected cases, no periodic reexamination will be scheduled:

(i) When the disability is established as static;

(ii) When the findings and symptoms are shown by examinations scheduled in paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section or other examinations and hospital reports to have persisted without material improvement for a period of 5 years or more;

(iii) Where the disability from disease is permanent in character and of such nature that there is no likelihood of improvement;

(iv) In cases of veterans over 55 years of age, except under unusual circumstances;

(v) When the rating is a prescribed scheduled minimum rating; or

(vi) Where a combined disability evaluation would not be affected if the future examination should result in reduced evaluation for one or more conditions.

I can see where Jay is correct, I would think permanent is permanent, but at the same time the VA covers their own hides by adding this statement in the beginning of the reg. "but shall not be construed as limiting VA’s authority to request reexaminations, or periods of hospital observation, at any time in order to ensure that a disability is accurately rated."

at least thats the way I understand it. It's like a job description in a way where they state the job requirements, but add the words "but not limited to" just in case they have you do something outside of your normal requirements.

Have a great day!!!

tdak

"Government is like a baby. An alimentary canal with a big appetite at one end and no sense of responsibility at the other. "...Ronald Reagan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I DONT CARE WHAT THE REGS SAY THE VA DOES WHAT THEY WANT AND IS ALWAYS BENDING THERE RULES. IT IS A CONSTANT BATTLE AND SOME THINK JUST BECUASE YOU GOT P&T THAT THE VA IS NEVER GOING TO BOTHER YOU AGIAN. WAKE UP. THE COST OF VA COMP IS SKY ROCKETING AND MAYBE NOT TODAY BUT IN THE FUTURE THE GOVERMENT IS GOING TO WANT TO LOOK AND SEE IF THE PEOPLE RECIEVING BENIFITS TRULY DESERVE THEM. AND WHEN SOCIAL SECRITY HITS ROCK BOTTOM I CAN BET THE FOCUS WILL TURN TO VA COMP. SO ALL I AM SAYING IS IS BE PREPARED AND I WOULD RATHER HAVE CURRENT DOC NOTES THEN NONE AT ALL. AND IF YOU HAVE NO PROGRESS REPORTS FROM YOUR SHRINK I WILL BET THAT YOU WILL LOOSE YOUR SSD OR SSI. ( I AM TALKING ABOUT US WITH MENTALL DISORDERS )I CAN NOT SPEAK ABOUT PHYSICAL DISORDERS. PEOPLE WITH MENTALL DISORDERS IN SOME EYES ARE NOT DISABLED. I HAVE STORY TO TELL,

THIS HAPPENED TODAY, I LIVE IN CALIFORNIA AND IN CALIFORNIA IF YOU ARE 100% OR I.U. ONE OF THE BENIFITS IS YOU GET FREE CAR REGISTRATION. ( IT IS EXPENSIVE IN CALI EVERTHYTHING IS.) SO I TAKE MY AWARD LETTER TO THE DMV. AND I HAVE MY 2 YEAR OLD DAUGHTER WITH ME. I GIVE IT TO DMV CLERK AND SAY I WOULD LIKE MY CAR REG WAIVED. SHE LOOKS AT THE PAPERWORK AND SAYS GET THIS, " YOU DONT LOOK DISABLED". IT WAS ON, I SAID " WHO ARE YOU ARE YOU A DOCTOR LET ME TALK TO A MANAGER." SHE SAYS, " I AM THE MANAGER" AND YOU HAVE TO PHYISICALLY DISABLED." I SAID BULLSHIT IT SAYS NOTHING IN THE REGS ABOUT MENTALL OR PHYSICALL. SO SHE SAYS NO AND IF IT WERENT FOR MY KID I WOULD HAVE HURT THAT LADY. I STARTED SHAKING AND HAD TO LEAVE FAST. I GUESS I FELT A LITTLE LIKE THE GUYS FROM NAM FELT WHEN THEY CAME HOME. THAT IS F@CK YOU JUST LEAVE WAS THE FEELING I GOT. I TOLD HER JUST BECUSE I CAN WALK AND HAVE MY ARMS DOES NOT MEAN THAT I AM NOT DISABLED. SO I CAME HOME AND CALLED MY STATE REP AND TOLD THEM WHAT HAPPENED AND THEY SAID TO FAX THE PAPER WORK TOP THEM AND THEY WOULD LOOK INTO IT. SO HAS SOON AS MY KID WAKES UP I WILL AND I WILL KEEP YOU POSTED ON WHAT HAPPENS. AND HAS FAR AS THE MANAGER I AM NOT DONE WITH HER. I CALLED DMV HEADQUTERS AND LAUNCHED A FORMEL COMPLAINT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can see where Jay is correct, I would think permanent is permanent, but at the same time the VA covers their own hides by adding this statement in the beginning of the reg. "but shall not be construed as limiting VA’s authority to request reexaminations, or periods of hospital observation, at any time in order to ensure that a disability is accurately rated."

at least thats the way I understand it. It's like a job description in a way where they state the job requirements, but add the words "but not limited to" just in case they have you do something outside of your normal requirements.

This is true and I think this is whythe VA is TRYING to get away with these P&T C&Ps, but that's not what the exemption is for. The VA can order someone who is P&T back for an exam if A) They get new and material evidence, or :( There is reason to believe the P&T rating falls under clear and unmistakeable error. It does not, however, give broad discretion to the RO to order a C&P whenever they feel like it, because that would be going against existing evidence and medical opinion (which stated that the condition is permanent in nature).

501(a) basically says that the VA has the authority to collect evidence needed to carry out VA law and establish benefits under said laws. It doesn't give the VA the right to supersede existing laws in order to go on a fishing expedition. If the VA has some evidence that puts the P&T into question then they have complete authority to look intothe matter, but fishing for a reason to lower someone goes against medical opinion and the raters to do not have authority to supersede medical doctrine and established opinions.

There's also other regs that blur into 3.327 like finality of decisions, which states that one RO cannot supersede another RO based on opinion, nor can one rater supersede another raters opinion because he/she feels the claim is too high (without CUE).

In short, veteran's ratings are more protected then we think and the regs are clearly on our side, but the SOs, and many veterans, let the VA trounce all over those regs without penalty, which is the true reason why so many vets have a horrible time dealing with the VA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I DONT CARE WHAT THE REGS SAY THE VA DOES WHAT THEY WANT AND IS ALWAYS BENDING THERE RULES. IT IS A CONSTANT BATTLE AND SOME THINK JUST BECUASE YOU GOT P&T THAT THE VA IS NEVER GOING TO BOTHER YOU AGIAN. WAKE UP. THE COST OF VA COMP IS SKY ROCKETING AND MAYBE NOT TODAY BUT IN THE FUTURE THE GOVERMENT IS GOING TO WANT TO LOOK AND SEE IF THE PEOPLE RECIEVING BENIFITS TRULY DESERVE THEM. AND WHEN SOCIAL SECRITY HITS ROCK BOTTOM I CAN BET THE FOCUS WILL TURN TO VA COMP. SO ALL I AM SAYING IS IS BE PREPARED AND I WOULD RATHER HAVE CURRENT DOC NOTES THEN NONE AT ALL. AND IF YOU HAVE NO PROGRESS REPORTS FROM YOUR SHRINK I WILL BET THAT YOU WILL LOOSE YOUR SSD OR SSI. ( I AM TALKING ABOUT US WITH MENTALL DISORDERS )I CAN NOT SPEAK ABOUT PHYSICAL DISORDERS. PEOPLE WITH MENTALL DISORDERS IN SOME EYES ARE NOT DISABLED. I HAVE STORY TO TELL,

THIS HAPPENED TODAY, I LIVE IN CALIFORNIA AND IN CALIFORNIA IF YOU ARE 100% OR I.U. ONE OF THE BENIFITS IS YOU GET FREE CAR REGISTRATION. ( IT IS EXPENSIVE IN CALI EVERTHYTHING IS.) SO I TAKE MY AWARD LETTER TO THE DMV. AND I HAVE MY 2 YEAR OLD DAUGHTER WITH ME. I GIVE IT TO DMV CLERK AND SAY I WOULD LIKE MY CAR REG WAIVED. SHE LOOKS AT THE PAPERWORK AND SAYS GET THIS, " YOU DONT LOOK DISABLED". IT WAS ON, I SAID " WHO ARE YOU ARE YOU A DOCTOR LET ME TALK TO A MANAGER." SHE SAYS, " I AM THE MANAGER" AND YOU HAVE TO PHYISICALLY DISABLED." I SAID BULLSHIT IT SAYS NOTHING IN THE REGS ABOUT MENTALL OR PHYSICALL. SO SHE SAYS NO AND IF IT WERENT FOR MY KID I WOULD HAVE HURT THAT LADY. I STARTED SHAKING AND HAD TO LEAVE FAST. I GUESS I FELT A LITTLE LIKE THE GUYS FROM NAM FELT WHEN THEY CAME HOME. THAT IS F@CK YOU JUST LEAVE WAS THE FEELING I GOT. I TOLD HER JUST BECUSE I CAN WALK AND HAVE MY ARMS DOES NOT MEAN THAT I AM NOT DISABLED. SO I CAME HOME AND CALLED MY STATE REP AND TOLD THEM WHAT HAPPENED AND THEY SAID TO FAX THE PAPER WORK TOP THEM AND THEY WOULD LOOK INTO IT. SO HAS SOON AS MY KID WAKES UP I WILL AND I WILL KEEP YOU POSTED ON WHAT HAPPENS. AND HAS FAR AS THE MANAGER I AM NOT DONE WITH HER. I CALLED DMV HEADQUTERS AND LAUNCHED A FORMEL COMPLAINT.

I'm not disagreeing with you on the fact that PTSD vets need to continue documenting care (if only for meds), but where we differ is in where that care should come from. I have FAR more control over my wife's civilian psychiatrist than I would a VA psychiatrist and I don't have to worry about some small note stating that "the patient seems to be improved today" that the VA can take out of context and use against her. In essence, a civilian doctor gives US control over what the VA can and can't see AND it stops the RO from going on fishing expeditions whenever they feel like it based on some VA doctor's notes.

As for your car registration - In WA we were able to get vet tags by simply mailing off a copy of her DD214 to the state DMV's veteran's office. It was fairly simple and painless and we didn't even have to go into a DMV to get it (was done all by mail). Perhaps you should check the CA DMV website and see if there's a similar program.

Also, what the DMV did to you may fall under the American's With Disabilities Act and you could have a possible lawsuite on your hands....may be worth looking into.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use