Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules
- 0
-
Tell a friend
-
Recent Achievements
-
Our picks
-
Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
Tbird posted a record in VA Claims and Benefits Information,
Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL
This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:
Current Diagnosis. (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)
In-Service Event or Aggravation.
Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”-
- 0 replies
Picked By
Tbird, -
-
Post in ICD Codes and SCT CODES?WHAT THEY MEAN?
Timothy cawthorn posted an answer to a question,
Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability ratingPicked By
yellowrose, -
-
Post in Chevron Deference overruled by Supreme Court
broncovet posted a post in a topic,
VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.
They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.
This is not true,
Proof:
About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because when they cant work, they can not keep their home. I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason: "Its been too long since military service". This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA. And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time, mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends.
Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly. The VA is broken.
A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals. I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision. All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did.
I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt". Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day? Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.Picked By
Lemuel, -
-
Post in Re-embursement for non VA Medical care.
broncovet posted an answer to a question,
Welcome to hadit!
There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not. Try reading this:
https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/
However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.
When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait! Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?" Not once. Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.
However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.
That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot. There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.
Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.
Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344
Picked By
Lemuel, -
-
Post in What is the DIC timeline?
broncovet posted an answer to a question,
Good question.
Maybe I can clear it up.
The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more. (my paraphrase).
More here:
Source:
https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/
NOTE: TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY. This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond. If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much.Picked By
Lemuel, -
-
Question
Josephine
Hi,
I am sorry to be like a worn out 78 record, but I still do not understand this Statement of the Case. I will type it and see if I am just dense.
October 7, 2004
You have filed a Notice of Disagreement with out action. This is the first step in appealing to the Board of Veterans' Appeals (BVA). This letter and enclosures contain very important information concerning your appeal.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE:
We have enclosed a Statement of the Case, a summary of the law and evidence concerning your claim. This summary will help you to make the best argument to the BVA on why you think our decision should be changed.
WHAT YOU NEED TO DO:
To complete your appeal, you must file a formal appeal. We have enclosed a VA Form 9, Appeal to the Board of Veterans' Appeals, which you may use to complete your appeal. We will gladly explain the form if you have any questions. You apeal should address:
the benefit you want
the facts in the Statement of the Case with which you disagree and
the errors that you believe we made in applying the law
ISSUE
Service connection for chronic anxiety with depression
EVIDENCE
Service medical records from March 5, 1963 throgh May 11, 1964
You were sent letter on June 11, 2003 and July 24, 2003 about the duty to assist provisions of the VCAA of 2000
Treatment records from Internal Medicaine August 1979 thugh February 2004
Report dated April 5, 2004 from Dr. M. P
Additional service records submitted by you in April 2004
Review of claims file, including all treatment records received
ADJUDICATIVE ACTIONS:
Military Service 03-15-1963 to 05-20-1964 Honorable
12-31-2002 - Claim Received
02-27-2004 - Claim considered on all evidence of record
03-23-2004 - You were notified of decision
( This decision was no service connection, but a non - service pension 100% for anxiety with depression, unemployable since 1983 denied due to excessive income.)
10-07-2004
The Decision Review Officer ( DRO) has completed a preliminary review of your file and has determined that, based on the evidence of record, your claim cannot be granted.
THIS IS NOT THE DRO'S FINAL DECISION. We are sending you this Statement of the Case so that you can better understand your appeal.
An Examination is being scheduled at the VA Medical Center. The VA Medical Center will notify you about the date and the time to report for the examination.
DECISION:
Service connection for chronic anxiety with depression is denied
REASONS AND BASES
The additional medical records submitted from The National Personnel Records Center and the report from Dr. M. P. dated April 2004 are considered to be "New and Material" and your claim for service connection for an" Acquired Psychiatric Disorder is reopened.
You were seen for a psychiatric consultation in March, 1964. You complained about being unhappy with the Navy since boot camp. Assessment was emotional immaturity, dependency, and instability which precluded further military service. Your post service treatment records show that you were diagnosed with anxiety in 1979. Dr. P reported that he reviewed your March 1964 consultation and expressed an opinion that your current anxiety and depression began during your military service.
( I did fill out the form 9 and turned it in and had it date stamped. My NOD is to the affect.)
I did not have a C&P for Anxiety with Depression
My post service treatment records 1965 through 1979 were not listed as evidence or considered
I want 100% service connection and not just the pension for anxiety with depression.
What do I think they did correctly? Not one thing
I am at the AMC remanded by the BVA.
What happened to the Anxiety and depression for which I was denied?
Everything is " an acquired psychiatric disorder"
My service officer stated this morning that the AMC may give me a C&P for anxiety and depression, for which I am filing. I filed in 1978 for nervousness. I did not file in 1992 as listed in the remand. I filed in 2002 and was denied, but given the pension.
My remand states that I have had two C&P examinations but neither was for " Anxiety with Depression. They were both for " an acquired psychiatric disorder".
If you have not followed my post. I did have my first C&P October 2004 - Anxiety not otherwise specified with depression. " More likely than not this veterans anxiety with depression began in service."
Five months later - April 2005. Board of two Psychiatrist - Axis l - Anxiety not other wise specified- Axis ll - Borderline personality disorder
GAF 40.
You were discharged by reasons of " Unsuitability and things that you considered indicative of abuse"
Appears this veterans primary symptoms are those of a personality disorder.
This veterans anxiety did not begin or worsen during service.
Thanks,
Josephine
Edited by JosephineLink to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
7
4
1
1
Popular Days
May 29
8
May 30
5
Top Posters For This Question
free_spirit_etc 7 posts
Josephine 4 posts
mobie16r 1 post
Jay Johnson 1 post
Popular Days
May 29 2007
8 posts
May 30 2007
5 posts
12 answers to this question
Recommended Posts