Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Commission On Va Benifits

Rate this question


maxwell18

Question

I read in the paper today that the commission on VA benfits said older vets are drawing too much disability pay and the younger vets are not drawing enough. The reason being the older vets have already made their careers and did not need the extra earnings with disability pay. The younger vets have have longer to live and are not drawing enough money for the long haul. I just wonder how these people can say older vets deserve less because of age and time to live. I guess they don't count all the years some vets put in over seas, combat, not living with your family? Lets cut the congress and senate retirement benifits and all the other perks they draw. They do not pay social security. Let us see what all they draw for life time. Enough is enough,

Bruce Maxwell CMSGT ret

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Older and younger vets should be getting more money because both groups have needs that are unique. Younger vets need more money because they do have to pull for the long haul. Older vets need more because even if they were to recover they can not find work that will pay them a decent living. The Commission is trying once again to pit one group of vets against the other. They want to split off the Iraq and Afghanistan vets from the Vietnam vets and the WWII and Korean vets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Their assumption is made on an older vet who has left service and held a post service job successfully and retired from that job, then filed for I/U at age 55 or 60 vs a younger vet who receives the same amount of disability payment for total disability and was not able to persue and maintain such post service employment.

Kinda makes sense in a way, however, I agree that they will use it and anything else they find to split groups of veterans. Also could be used to attack I/U again if you began drawing I/U at a late age.

Now if you had to quit your job because of a service connected disability that would be ok but if you retired from a post service job and then applied for I/U hmmmmmmm..........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest RickB54

We have had this discussion before in various forms.

Basically it confirms what I have stated for years.

If a veteran works until age 65, and then takes a normal retirement he should not be awarded TDIU, why? because va compensation is based on loss wages, it is not an entitlement program. Where are the lost wages if someone is already retired and then decides he wants TDIU.

As a service officer years ago I helped two veterans who were both in there 70's who had service connected hypertension, who later had heart attacks. The were both retired for years when they had their heart attacks, but because they were sc for hypertension, they requested and were awarded TDIU. To me this was an abuse of the system, but regardless it was legal.

I think we will see the rules change in a year or two, and we will not be seeing veterans at 65 or 70 being awarded TDIU. Why because as I said, it makes no sense to award TDIU to someone who is already retired for non medical reasons. Any way my two cents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rick you rolled right on passed the "commision was also to investigate... the implied intent of congree to compensate for loss of quality of life...."

now think on that for a second... implied intent to compensate for the loss of quality of life....

I'm not necessarily disagreeing with you, just stating that there may be other factors involved here... I am unsure personally I have never heard that it was an implied intent, but it was stated as such in the article... I wonder if its phrased that way by the commission as their charter... I'm going to have to look that up.

TDIU for someone who is 70... hmm... yeah I guess I'd have to think long and hard about that as well, BUT... I filed a claim for a vet who was 63 had lost half his foot and never received a cent from the VA nor any medical care since he lost it in vietnam.... I think he was a special case but there ya go, i think he deserves whatever I can get him... they threw him out onto the streets and he never even knew he could file a claim, or get care.... until he was 63 and I met him.....

Its a ... hard decision in any case...

Bob Smith

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My 2 cents,

What about those of us that were lowballed in the 1980's and wern't smart enought to appeal (yep that was me). Go to work everyday (in pain) and then finally it begins to impact work performance and quality of life (can't grin and bear it no more).

I can relate to the argument about if one is retired why should they be entitled to a TDIU rating, but lets start paying vets what they are due in a timely manner instead of forcing them to fight the system for years (I haven't had it bad, but am picking up on the horror stories).

Sorry not much of a substantive post, but its a burr that is beginning to rub me raw!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use