Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Loss Of Use

Rate this question


windy city

Question

Placed a claim for lou of use of lower extremities which is being caused by my S/C disabilities. Recieaved letter from VA saying that they got my claim. Enclosed was a paper informing me that if order to get the smc at the R2 I must present a statement from a licensed health care. Well my civilian doctor put me in a home exercise program for my back,legs and hips for which my wife is supervising and my physical therapiest is going to check twice a month. Need soem kind of advice on what to do.Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 13
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Guys-opinions needed-

When Rod had a Section 1151 stroke a Neuro gave him a C & P.

It was done in the hallway between three exam rooms at the local VAMC.

It took about 5 minutes.

She (the Neuro)said What is wrong with you?-He was surprised because she was the doctor -not him-so when he looked at me instead of replying-I said he had a major cerebralvascular accident.

(All the docs at this VAMC would ask that question-he forgot this was their SOP)

'Can you stand on your heels and on your toes?'

(Rod couldn't do this as his balance from the stroke was still off. He dealt with so many mental problems that he thought at first the doctor meant stand on heels and toes at the same time)

Then the doctor leaned back in her chair in the hallway and loudly stated "Mr. Simmons-I pronouce you totally and Permanently disabled " as if she had just found the Holy Grail-

Rod looked at me like Duh!!!!!- no kidding-

My question is-since I was told he would never walk again and only a fight with the VAMC got him therapy and he did walk again- though not with a normal gait- is this a loss of use of foot?

Probably not?

Then again he could not dial a phone number nor write a legible check nor be able to handle change and dollars-part of that was due to 1151 vision problems.He had been in a computer program at the local college but found he could only use one finger and with the vision problems and coorsination problems, he could not use the computer at all like he used to.His hands were always numb.I had to watch him in the shower as he could not tell hot from cold water.

More importantly-this is all documented in his SSA records.

He used to have PHVAC license and our heater broke-

it only needed a prime and I could do it but he wanted to-he felt this was his job so I got him the tools and he managed to sit on the floor to open the heater up.

This is something he had done for neighbors many times as well as us- because NYS temps get so low that the fuel line can actually freeze up or get chunky and the system has to be primed.

He had a lot of trouble holding the wrenches-you need 2 on 2 of the nuts-I took one wrench to hold

then his wrench slipped, and damaged another part of the system and he broke down and cried as he realised he could not even handle these tools anymore.

It ended up costing us money too to fix what got broke-he felt devastated by his inability to do this simple job.It wasnt his fault at all.

My long point here is that SSA seems to take great details as to how limited ones use of their hands is due to many disabilities. If you cannot use your hands how can you work in most jobs.

Question -does this satisfy -in your opinions- as loss of use of hands under 38 USC 1114??

After his stroke his hands were almost in a clubbed position but he could move his fingers.

The ME even noted his hands on his autopsy-as

"washerpersons hands"

I found this is a condition- a symdrome that results in diabetics who suffer severe dehydration.

That supports the nursing notes that document that Rod told them many times in the local VAMC that he was dying of thirst.(one n urse told me they would kill him if I didnt get him out of there-luckily I had already raised enough hell that they were in process of transferring him)

I am sorry- I go on and on- when I think of all this-

I guess I have PTSD from it all too-

it took me months and months to even consider re-opening his death claim for AO direct SC death.

My daughter insisted that I do that.

I still see him collapsing and dying when I go into the barn.

You guys have an excellent discussion going here on SMC- these posts can help others in hyperspace I am sure.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use