Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Claims Pending At Time Of Death

Rate this question


free_spirit_etc

Question

I am sending in evidence to go with my DIC / accrued benefits claim.

My husband had a claim for lung cancer (which he died from) pending at the time of his death.

As my husband's lung cancer claim also provides evidence of other respiratory conditions are these also "pending claims?"

He did not specifically ask that his claim be adjudicated for other respiratory conditions. However, wouldn't they still be claims raised by the evidence submitted in the pending claim?

He was diagnosed with mild emphysema and Interstial Lung Disease 2 years after his retirement. He does have some reduced pulmonary function tests in his SMR's (FEV-1 / FVC 83.8 in 1986 and 82% in 1987).

He also was diagnosed with Chronic Bronchitis in 1985. In June 1996 (two years before his retirement - it is reported that he had coughing from bronchitis in Dec 95 that caused him to have left sided rib pain for 6 months.

I submitted information from the National Cancer Institute, American Lung Association, etc that indicates that repeated bouts with bronchitis or pneumonia can be early symptoms of lung cancer.

So that might add some support that he did have symptoms that could be attributed to lung cancer while still in the service. Or at least an argument can be made that they can't just blow off the respiratory symptoms IN his SMRS as "just bronchitis" without giving a medical rational for dissociating the bronchitis from the lung cancer - when medically sound principles indicate that repeated bouts of bronchitis can be a symptom of lung cancer.

So can I request that all respiratory conditions that are reasonably raised by the evidence in the lung cancer claim be considered?

Also -- as my husband required substantial care beginning in December 06 - through his death Feb 07 - does this raise a claim for Special Monthly Compensation (as the evidence submitted WILL show he required this level of care) - or will he not be considered for this as the evidence in his record at the time he died would not show the extra care he needed at the end of his life.

Free

Free

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 1
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

1 answer to this question

Recommended Posts

You could raise those additional issues and if you can get an IMO-this is a good printout that the doctor could use.

However-the VA will be focusing on the lung cancer claim and the death certificate and how his cancer and death was due to his service.

I believe you stated that there is documentation in his SMRs to show these potenetial symptoms of lung cancer while in service.

The VA will not connect the dots and they also look unfavorably on internet print outs and say they are not medically specific to the claim.

Have you considered getting an IMO (Independent Medical Opinion)?

How about the doctor who opined on the death certificate?Was this a VA doc or private doctor?

Did the VA send your husband a VCAA letter or any SOC at all denying the claim and saying why prior to his death?

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use