Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Heart Was Stopped Severl Lacerations Of Jugular

Rate this question


littlejuniata

Question

  • Answers 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

I have already replied to you regarding all this.

You need your medical records. They will reveal malpractice if it occurred.

It is best to get an IMO doctor to review those records.

For am IMO fee you will have either Peace of mind knowing the VA did not malpractice on you or you will have an IMO that will support both a Section 1151 claim and a Federal Tort claim action against them.

If you lost significant blood-asyou mentioned due to medical error- as I stated before to you there is a record of transsfusion in the med recs.

The VA itself MUST maintain transfusion records to account to the blood bank what they use and how much they need.

Again- Get your medical records and seek an IMO doctor's opinion on whether the VA committed malpractice.If they did , get a lawyer for FTCA claim and get a service officer for the Sec 1151 claim.

I have nothing else to add.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Berta: After two years I am just now digesting what happened, I do have my medical records, reading the procedures I see nothing about the amount of blood loss. the terminology was :several areas of laceration of internal jugular vein were controlled, with suture and the take off of the subclavia artery also was found to have bleeding. the patient became acutely hypotensive and received external cardiac massage. cardiacpulmanary bypass was started at 2.4 L/minute/m2 bpdu sirface area,(whatever that means) after the repairs to my veins/ areteries I was closed back up (chest was opened for valve replacement surgery) about 3 weeks later they did the valve replacement, during that time I was in a coma. The malpractice was inatentavness during the neck intrusion and failing to notice blood loss? I have a letter from the VA Attym requesting income loss, dependents, prior non VA medical records from any and all doctors (I have none excet for emergency) a detailed report from a medical expert, then "we must reach an administrative resolution by Dec 15 2007", whatever that means?

Edited by littlejuniata
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Looks to me like the VA knows that they are on the hook. Don't forget that when you settle if you do that VA must service connect the problem under the Gardner Decision.

Good Luck

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

The U.S. Court of Veteran's Appeals issued the landmark decision in 1991, invalidating a 60-year-old VA regulation that required veterans to prove VA negligence before receiving compensation for additional disabilities that occurred as a result of VA healthcare. ...

This allowed a Veteran who was injured by VA care to be compensated and service connected for the injury. Although I think you have proof of negligence the service connection part applies to your case.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use