Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Cll Back Compensation

Rate this question


jhfleet

Question

I am one of those affected by the recent Appeals Court ruling that VA has to pay from the date of claim for Agent Orange connected CLL. Previously VA would pay only from October 16, 2003 for claims submitted prior to that date. My claim was made in early 2003, and many claims were made several years prior to 2003. So, this is a very big win for those affected. I checked with VA to see if CLL claims would be re-opened as a result of the court finding and if back pay to the date of claim was forthcoming. The VA person said each claimant would have to write the VA and contest the date of award in order for the date to be adjusted in accordance with the court decision. The VA was handed it's head by the Appeals Court over this issue and might be dragging its feet on back pay. Therefore, it might speed up matters if an appeal letter is written by CLL claimants who have back pay coming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 13
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Ask them to reconsider and sent them a copy from the NVLSP weeb site of exactly what I posted here-in a prior post-

CLL Nehmer retro goes back to the date of the claim.

"NVLSP Wins Ruling in the 9th Circuit Requiring VA to Pay Retroactive

Benefits for CLL

On July 19, 2007, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled in favor of Vietnam veterans in the latest chapter of Nehmer v. Department of Veterans Affairs. The Court of Appeals sided with NVLSP in affirming the ruling of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California that required the VA to pay retroactive benefits for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL). The decision is a huge victory for veterans and their families.

Previously, the earliest effective date the VA would assign for CLL-related claims based on Agent Orange exposure was October 16, 2003, the date of the VA’s regulation presumptively service-connecting CLL. Now, pursuant to the Court’s ruling, Vietnam veterans or their survivors are entitled to benefits retroactive to the date of their first claim based on CLL, even if the claim was made prior to October 16, 2003."

NVLSP Web site-

I would print it off from the NVLSP site- in full color- and maybe then they will get it-

BTW-tonight I am sure we will be discussing Nehmer with John Rossie Blue Water Navy-at the SVR veterans broadcast available on your PC and free call in number at http://www.stardustent.com/

The proposed Blue Water Navy AO bill by Senator Akaka will undo Nehmer retro forever

if any idiots in the Senate actually pass this bill.

I suggest that you contact Rick Spaturo whose addy is within this long link:

http://www.dd-692.com/porthole.htm- go to the part about CLL vets-he is lawyer from NVLSP who won CLL and Nehmer and wants to here from affected CLL vets who didnt get proper retro.

The VARO that is sending you this crap is in absolute defiance of established VA case law regarding Nehmer.IMO.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I filed a NOD in response to the denial for retro pay that I posted earlier in this thread. The DRO found that the denial was a CUE and awarded retro from the original date of the award back to the date of claim about eight months earlier. This site was a great help to me and i appreciate it very much!

Now, does anyone know how long after a favorable decision it takes to actually get a retro payment??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It can get in your checking account or mailbox within a week or ten days-

Sometimes this takes longer but I always got a check even before the award letter came-

GREAT!!!! Nehmer in action for a proper AO retro amount!!!!

I dont think many vet reps really know what the Nehmer decision is all about.

If Haas wins in the Fed court-we will sure be getting Nehmer questions from veterans here.

This is wonderful news!

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
    • karlduerr earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use