Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • Donate Now and Keep Us Helping You

     

  • 0

Lawyer Will Not Take Calls

Rate this question


rthomass

Question

Guys, I have a very unique situation. I have a team of Lawyers out of Washington, DC that refuse to take my calls or return same. Our contract in part states that ;"Attorneys shall take reasonable steps to keep client informed of progress and to respond to Client's inquiries". While I realize I could terminate our contract for breach, I am reluctannt at this stage since the appeal/claim is at the VARO for readjudication after having been to the BVA, AMC, and United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Appeals.

HOW DO I GET THEIR ATTENTION?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 8
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Start a paper trail, by sending E-mails or certified letters......they do not want a malpractice claim or a sanction by the court.

Do yourself a favor.....buy some gold and silver! The printing presses are in overdrive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm afraid they're ALL like that. Same thing happened to me with 3 different law firms. All they care about is making money for themselves -- and not working too hard to do it -- so you (and the rest of us) are just pawns towards that end.

In short, they couldn't care less about keeping us informed, as they tick away your statute-of-limitations time doing nothing, and then make it seem like it's YOUR fault -- like you're bothering them big-time and being highly unreasonable -- for trying to find anything out. I just got rid of the lazy/rude/inconsiderate bums and continued on by myself. No more lawyers for me for ANYTHING ever again.

Good luck with YOUR sleaze lawyers,

-- John D.

Guys, I have a very unique situation. I have a team of Lawyers out of Washington, DC that refuse to take my calls or return same. Our contract in part states that ;"Attorneys shall take reasonable steps to keep client informed of progress and to respond to Client's inquiries". While I realize I could terminate our contract for breach, I am reluctannt at this stage since the appeal/claim is at the VARO for readjudication after having been to the BVA, AMC, and United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Appeals.

HOW DO I GET THEIR ATTENTION?

Edited by cloudcroft

70% TDIU/P&T

Army - RVN - 1969-70 (10th Cav/4th ID, II Corps RVN)

USCG - Galveston, TX - 1976-78 (USCGC Valiant, WMEC 621)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
Guys, I have a very unique situation. I have a team of Lawyers out of Washington, DC that refuse to take my calls or return same. Our contract in part states that ;"Attorneys shall take reasonable steps to keep client informed of progress and to respond to Client's inquiries". While I realize I could terminate our contract for breach, I am reluctannt at this stage since the appeal/claim is at the VARO for readjudication after having been to the BVA, AMC, and United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Appeals.

HOW DO I GET THEIR ATTENTION?

Just send them a little certified letter reminding them of the existence of their ETHICS committee. That should do it.

"It is cold and we have no blankets.

The little children are freezing to death.

My people, some of them, have run away to the hills, and have no blankets, no food; no one knows where they are-perhaps freezing to death.

I want to have time to look for my children and see how many of them I can find.

Maybe I shall find them among the dead.

Hear me, my chiefs! I am tired; my heart is sick and sad.

From where the sun now stands, I will fight no more forever."

Chief Joseph

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And you might want to read over carefully and attach:

[Code of Federal Regulations]

[Title 38, Volume 1]

[Revised as of July 1, 2002]

From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access

[CITE: 38CFR14.633]

[Page 539-541]

TITLE 38--PENSIONS, BONUSES, AND VETERANS' RELIEF

CHAPTER I--DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

PART 14--LEGAL SERVICES, GENERAL COUNSEL, AND MISCELLANEOUS CLAIMS--Table

of Contents

Sec. 14.633 Termination of accreditation of agents, attorneys, and representatives.

(a) Accreditation may be canceled at the request of an agent,

attorney, representative, or organization.

(;) Accreditation shall be canceled at such time a determination is

made that any requirement of Sec. 14.629 is no longer met by an agent,

attorney, or representative.

© Accreditation shall be canceled when the General Counsel finds,

by clear and convincing evidence, one of the following:

[[Page 540]]

(1) Violation of or refusal to comply with the laws administered by

the Department of Veterans Affairs or with the regulations governing

practice before the Department of Veterans Affairs;

(2) Knowingly presenting or prosecuting a fraudulent claim against

the United States, or knowingly providing false information to the

United States;

(3) Demanding or accepting unlawful compensation for preparing,

presenting, prosecuting, or advising or consulting, concerning a claim;

(4) Any other unlawful, unprofessional, or unethical practice.

(Unlawful, unprofessional, or unethical practice shall include but not

be limited to the following--deceiving, misleading or threatening a

claimant or prospective claimant; neglecting to prosecute a claim for 6

months or more; failing to furnish a reasonable response within 90 days

of request for evidence by the Department of Veterans Affairs, or

willfully withholding an application for benefits.)

(d) Accreditation shall be canceled when the General Counsel finds

an agent's, attorney's, or representative's performance before the

Department of Veterans Affairs demonstrates a lack of the degree of

competence necessary to adequately prepare, present, and prosecute

claims for veteran's benefits.

(e) As to cancellation of accreditation under paragraphs (B), © or

(d) of this section, upon receipt of information from any source

indicating failure to meet the requirements of Sec. 14.629, improper

conduct, or incompetence, the Regional Counsel of jurisdiction shall

initiate an inquiry into the matter. If the matter involves an

accredited representative of a recognized organization, this inquiry

shall include contact with the representative's organization.

(1) If the result of the inquiry does not justify further action,

the Regional Counsel will close the inquiry and maintain the record for

3 years.

(2) If the result of the inquiry justifies further action, the

Regional Counsel shall take the following action:

(i) As to representatives, suspend accreditation immediately and

notify the representative and the representative's organization of the

suspension and of an intent to cancel accreditation. The notice to the

representative will also state the reasons for the suspension and

impending cancellation, and inform the representative of a right to

request a hearing on the matter or to submit additional evidence within

10 working days following receipt of such notice. Such time may be

extended for a reasonable period upon a showing of sufficient cause.

(ii) As to agents or attorneys, inform the General Counsel of the

result of the inquiry and notify the agent or attorney of an intent to

cancel accreditation. The notice will also state the reason(s) for the

impending cancellation and inform the party of a right to request a

hearing on the matter or to submit additional evidence within 10 working

days of receipt of such notice. Such time may be extended for a

reasonable period upon a showing of sufficient cause.

(iii) In the event that a hearing is not requested, the Regional

Counsel shall forward the record to the General Counsel for final

determination.

(f) If a hearing is requested, a hearing officer will be appointed

by the Director of the regional office involved. The hearing officer

shall not be from the Office of the Regional Counsel. The hearing

officer will have authority to administer oaths. A member of the

Regional Counsel's office will present the evidence. The party

requesting the hearing will have a right to counsel, to present

evidence, and to cross-examine witnesses. Upon request of the party

requesting the hearing, an appropriate Department of Veterans Affairs

official designated in Sec. 2.1 of this chapter may issue subpoenas to

compel the attendance of witnesses and the production of documents

necessary for a fair hearing. The hearing shall be conducted in an

informal manner and court rules of evidence shall not apply. Testimony

shall be recorded verbatim. The hearing officer shall submit the entire

hearing transcript, any pertinent records or information, and a

recommended finding to the Regional Counsel within 10 working days after

the close of the hearing. The Regional Counsel will immediately forward

the entire record to the General Counsel for decision.

[[Page 541]]

(g) The decision of the General Counsel is final. The effective date

for termination of accreditation shall be the date upon which a final

decision is rendered. The records of the case will be maintained in the

General Counsel's office for 3 years.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 5902, 5904)

[53 FR 52422, Dec. 28, 1988]

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the email idea. There are programs you can get that shows if someone has opened your email (and all sorts of other things) My husband used readnotify for that.

I have been using emails with my attorney lately to handle all the probate stuff.

The thing I like about emails is they tell you more than their formal letters - but you also have a record of what was said (unlike a phone conversation).

Free

Start a paper trail, by sending E-mails or certified letters......they do not want a malpractice claim or a sanction by the court.
Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Berta's information is extremely pertinent. In most states, the BAR says that to not respond to requests from clients is considered unethical behavior. I would also do with JRs emails or certified letters. You might also see if you can find online reference to DC ethical behavior and reference that as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • OddBal79 earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • OddBal79 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • OddBal79 earned a badge
      First Post
    • AFguy1999 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use