Can you look it over and give me any pointers [ Be gentle it my first time!!]
Dear Sir/Madam
I received a rating decision dated November 20th 2006.
Consider this letter to be an offical Notice of Disagreement [NOD] regarding the following disability:
Degenerative Disc Diease of the Lumbar Spine, Rated at 10%
I disagree with Rating decision due to the following reasons:
[a] At no time during my C&P examination on October 4th 2006 did the examiner measure my range of motion with a goniometer. Title 38 part:
Accurate measurement: Accurate measurement of the lenght of stumps, excursion of Joints, dimensions and location of scars with repect to landmarks should be insidted on. The use of a goniometer in the measurement of limitation of motion is indispensable in examinatios conducted within the department of Veterans Affairs. Muscle atrophy must also be accurately measured and reported.
The Range of motion measurements used in my rating decision were results taken from the December 9th 2002 examination done by Dr. C----- 4 years prior to my C&P exam [ this record is in my file.
[c] The C&P examiner stated on page 28 of his c&p report this " The Range of Motion was deffered because he [ the examiner] didn't want to risk a Flare Up of my back pain.
[d] The examiner also stated in his report that i was to avoid twisting, bending or stooping.
[e] On page 29 of the C&P exam on October 4th 2006 the examiner also writes that there are effects on my usual daily activies = Chore= moderate, Exercise= Moderate, Sports=Prevented.
[f] The examiner also wrote that i only have intermitted low back pain which you treat with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medication as needed. THIS WAS NOT A TRUE statement. I was taking on a daily routine basis as perscribed by my pcp for my chronic back pain the following medications and dosage;
Aleve 220mg tablets, 2 tablets 4 times a day.
Flexeril 10mg tablets, 2 tablets 3 times a day.
Gabapentin 300mg capsules. 3 capsules [900mg] 3 times a day.
At the time of the C&P exam i had just broken on right wrist the day before and was on Demerol 50mg tablets 1 tablet 4 times a day.
In March 2007 my pcp added an analegsis ointment applied to my back 4 times a day.
[g] The side effects of my medications, Drowsiness, dizziness, incoodination, mental confusion also interfer with my activies of daily living. Puts myself and others around me in danger on the job and while working.
[h] The C&P examiner also wrote on page 24 of the exam report " The lumbar spine condition more likely than not prevents him from working his mechanic job in my opinion. Mechanic work would require him twisting, bending and stooping which should be avoided. [Please see the attached Job description for a mechanic]
The Examiner also wrote " he [me] states Range of Motion of the l spine is not additionally limited by pain, fatque or repetitive use and that the additional loss of motion due to pain, fatique, weakness or lack of endurance. He answered "No"
This is not a fair and true statement as i was not ask about the above statement during the exam. If i had been ask i could have told him that just about any activity that i have to use my back for causes Pain. Standing to just wash the dishes i have to avoid the usual twisting and turning mmotions. i step from side to side. Same goes for sweeping the floor. I try to do whatever i can to avoid a flare up.
[j] Ankylosis is mentioned in the decision letter. Due to the 2 level disectomies and the spinal fusion fixed my lower spine in a neutral position [ zero degrees] But it wasn't taken into consideration.
[k] Statement in the decision letter states: Follow up report 6 weeks after surgery you reported only mild discomfort in the low back with no recurrence of radicular pain down the right leg. Dr C----- provided the opinon that you would be able to be gainfully employed with limitations on heavy lifing by the end of june 2006.
I was still at that time at 6 weeks post surgery still taking large doses of Narcotic pain medications. I'm sure that would have had a strong influence on the level of pain i was experencing on that day and things i might have said. I didn't seek treatment of the addiction i had developed over the prior 10 months before surgery until sometime in July 2006.
As for the limitation as to the heavy lifting he placed on me i was not employed at the time i was under Dr C------ care and hadn't worked since July of 2005 so he wasn't aware that i was a diesel mechanic by profession. The only work i have done or trained for since getting out of the military. It requires actions and movements that i can no longer do due to the 2 plates, rods and screws in my back tha prevent these actions.
[l] The last statement in the decision letter " since there is likelihood of improvement, The assigned evaluation is not considered permanet and is subject to future examination"
Please see the attached NEW MRI dated October 4th 2007. My condition continues to deteriate and now includes changes to the T11 and T12 as well as new changes to L1-L2, L2-L3,L3-L4, L4-L5, L5-S1.
Also see the New Progress notes attached with new stripations placed on my activities by my pcp as to no Prolonged Sitting or Standing.
[m] i beleive the whole picture of my disability warrants a highter rating of at least 40%.
I fully intend to continue to appeal until the benifits i seek have been granted.
Question
jessie0054
Hello again:
I am trying to write the NOD letter for my son.
Can you look it over and give me any pointers [ Be gentle it my first time!!]
Dear Sir/Madam
I received a rating decision dated November 20th 2006.
Consider this letter to be an offical Notice of Disagreement [NOD] regarding the following disability:
Degenerative Disc Diease of the Lumbar Spine, Rated at 10%
I disagree with Rating decision due to the following reasons:
[a] At no time during my C&P examination on October 4th 2006 did the examiner measure my range of motion with a goniometer. Title 38 part:
Accurate measurement: Accurate measurement of the lenght of stumps, excursion of Joints, dimensions and location of scars with repect to landmarks should be insidted on. The use of a goniometer in the measurement of limitation of motion is indispensable in examinatios conducted within the department of Veterans Affairs. Muscle atrophy must also be accurately measured and reported.
The Range of motion measurements used in my rating decision were results taken from the December 9th 2002 examination done by Dr. C----- 4 years prior to my C&P exam [ this record is in my file.
[c] The C&P examiner stated on page 28 of his c&p report this " The Range of Motion was deffered because he [ the examiner] didn't want to risk a Flare Up of my back pain.
[d] The examiner also stated in his report that i was to avoid twisting, bending or stooping.
[e] On page 29 of the C&P exam on October 4th 2006 the examiner also writes that there are effects on my usual daily activies = Chore= moderate, Exercise= Moderate, Sports=Prevented.
[f] The examiner also wrote that i only have intermitted low back pain which you treat with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medication as needed. THIS WAS NOT A TRUE statement. I was taking on a daily routine basis as perscribed by my pcp for my chronic back pain the following medications and dosage;
Aleve 220mg tablets, 2 tablets 4 times a day.
Flexeril 10mg tablets, 2 tablets 3 times a day.
Gabapentin 300mg capsules. 3 capsules [900mg] 3 times a day.
At the time of the C&P exam i had just broken on right wrist the day before and was on Demerol 50mg tablets 1 tablet 4 times a day.
In March 2007 my pcp added an analegsis ointment applied to my back 4 times a day.
[g] The side effects of my medications, Drowsiness, dizziness, incoodination, mental confusion also interfer with my activies of daily living. Puts myself and others around me in danger on the job and while working.
[h] The C&P examiner also wrote on page 24 of the exam report " The lumbar spine condition more likely than not prevents him from working his mechanic job in my opinion. Mechanic work would require him twisting, bending and stooping which should be avoided. [Please see the attached Job description for a mechanic]
The Examiner also wrote " he [me] states Range of Motion of the l spine is not additionally limited by pain, fatque or repetitive use and that the additional loss of motion due to pain, fatique, weakness or lack of endurance. He answered "No"
This is not a fair and true statement as i was not ask about the above statement during the exam. If i had been ask i could have told him that just about any activity that i have to use my back for causes Pain. Standing to just wash the dishes i have to avoid the usual twisting and turning mmotions. i step from side to side. Same goes for sweeping the floor. I try to do whatever i can to avoid a flare up.
[j] Ankylosis is mentioned in the decision letter. Due to the 2 level disectomies and the spinal fusion fixed my lower spine in a neutral position [ zero degrees] But it wasn't taken into consideration.
[k] Statement in the decision letter states: Follow up report 6 weeks after surgery you reported only mild discomfort in the low back with no recurrence of radicular pain down the right leg. Dr C----- provided the opinon that you would be able to be gainfully employed with limitations on heavy lifing by the end of june 2006.
I was still at that time at 6 weeks post surgery still taking large doses of Narcotic pain medications. I'm sure that would have had a strong influence on the level of pain i was experencing on that day and things i might have said. I didn't seek treatment of the addiction i had developed over the prior 10 months before surgery until sometime in July 2006.
As for the limitation as to the heavy lifting he placed on me i was not employed at the time i was under Dr C------ care and hadn't worked since July of 2005 so he wasn't aware that i was a diesel mechanic by profession. The only work i have done or trained for since getting out of the military. It requires actions and movements that i can no longer do due to the 2 plates, rods and screws in my back tha prevent these actions.
[l] The last statement in the decision letter " since there is likelihood of improvement, The assigned evaluation is not considered permanet and is subject to future examination"
Please see the attached NEW MRI dated October 4th 2007. My condition continues to deteriate and now includes changes to the T11 and T12 as well as new changes to L1-L2, L2-L3,L3-L4, L4-L5, L5-S1.
Also see the New Progress notes attached with new stripations placed on my activities by my pcp as to no Prolonged Sitting or Standing.
[m] i beleive the whole picture of my disability warrants a highter rating of at least 40%.
I fully intend to continue to appeal until the benifits i seek have been granted.
I am requesting a DE Novo review.
I will be waiting your reply:
Sincerely:
Anything i need to change?? Add??
Thanks Jessie
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
6
2
1
1
Popular Days
Oct 19
8
Oct 20
5
Top Posters For This Question
jessie0054 6 posts
Berta 2 posts
Pete53 1 post
john999 1 post
Popular Days
Oct 19 2007
8 posts
Oct 20 2007
5 posts
Posted Images
12 answers to this question
Recommended Posts