Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Notice Of Disagreements

Rate this question


danang_1969

Question

How many times can a vet file a NOD on a claim. Is it once per decision? Once per claim? Let me give a hypothetical here. If a vet got a decision in Jan of 06 and filed a NOD in Feb of 06. Got a decision on that NOD in Jan of 07. Could the vet then file a NOD on that decision within 60 days? Would it be considered a separate decision and allow the vet to file a NOD. Bertha, Pete, those that have been there done that in the NOD process, give me some info on this subject. It could be useful for other vets in the future. We certainly can't get this info off www.va.gov

Danang_1969.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 18
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

What is really good is when the VA helps you rewrite your doctors opinions and helps you reinterpret your evience. It is like you never saw it before they get done. This is really ture if lots of money is on the line. Bald faced lies and bending and twisting of facts is SOP. The best is when they use you own IMO to deny your claim. Now the vet is paying to provdide ammunition to cut his own throat.

My VARO has actually sent a SOC along with my original rating decision in the same package. I know this does not make sense but they have done it. Many of these decisions look like they were written by 10 year olds.

Maybe the VA is outsourcing our decisions to the local elementary school to reduce the backlog.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest rickb054
Rick,

You might understand if you go back and read through the thread slowly.

jmho,

carlie

Carlie, Nothing like being condescending, hope you feel better.

Still doen't make you right.

now have a good thanksgiving.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rick,

You posted,

" Carlie, Nothing like being condescending, hope you feel better.

Still doen't make you right."

I was not speaking down to you and certainly doing that -- would never make me feel better.

I have no need to be right -- I have no need to try and make someone else feel wrong.

Simply put, the VA claims process either works or doesn't work but whichever the case,

it all goes in steps.

Vet gets Rating Decision -- Vet files NOD with additional evidence or reiterates evidence VA

doesn't list in the evidence section of the Rating Decision or submits SMR's not yet of record,

Vet presents their contentions of why the Rating Decision should have granted their claim,

at this time Vet may also request a DRO Hearing.

VA either informs vet that a DRO Hearing will be scheduled and/or provides Vet with a SOC,

and the fight continues.

But UNTIL that happens the Vet has received nothing to submit an additional NOD against.

Step by step.

Hope this helps a Vet.

jmho,

carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

If you have new evidence you can ask for a reconsideration of the original decision, but the clock is stil running on the NOD time frame. I did this recently and got a reconsideration for SMC. It was faster than filing a NOD and going to the DRO or BVA. It does not always work since you are going back to the same guys who denied or low balled you. I really don't know which path is better. You don't want your claim sitting in limbo and not in an appeals line. I think you are rolling the dice either way. You just want to stay in their face at the local level as long as you can. Get a personal hearing if you lose the reconsideration. Every time you get a decision you can appeal it. I can only say what has worked for me and many disagree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you have new evidence you can ask for a reconsideration of the original decision, but the clock is stil running on the NOD time frame. I did this recently and got a reconsideration for SMC. It was faster than filing a NOD and going to the DRO or BVA. It does not always work since you are going back to the same guys who denied or low balled you. I really don't know which path is better. You don't want your claim sitting in limbo and not in an appeals line. I think you are rolling the dice either way. You just want to stay in their face at the local level as long as you can. Get a personal hearing if you lose the reconsideration. Every time you get a decision you can appeal it. I can only say what has worked for me and many disagree.

I feel the same way about me rolling the dice. I feel if anyone at the RO will half way look at my new evidence and read the explanation, of even one of my issues and be considerate of the recent submitted conflicting or omitted evidence from the last decision and if they really want to give me a fair shake I will be much better off going the NOD regional route and keeping it at the RO level than sending it to the backed up BVA. If they don't want to give me a fair shake, I don't know of anything I can do about it anyway. I do have congressional interest stamped on my claim and I don't know how the Ro feels about that, if they find it intimidating or not. I did not have congressional interest for 9 years and got no where until afterwards.

I have already submitted and requested a NOD Tuesday, knowing that the Thanksgiving holidays were coming up and everyone would be long gone from all offices and my deadline is 11/25/07, so I could not wait any longer. I did send it certified return receipt requested, and faxed it to Regional office as well, the same day I mailed it certified RRR. So, I should be timely, but I will just have to wait see. Thanks John for the confirmation on you would have done the same thing. That gives me some hope. There is a real good chance, that if I have to wait until the BVA rules on it, it could be too late. Just facing the probably facts.

God Bless all of you for your help.

Danang_1969

Link to comment
Share on other sites

John you said "Maybe the VA is outsourcing our decisions to the local elementary school to reduce the backlog." I wish they would do this for I think we would get a better decision and product than what we get from the raters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use