Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Psychological Effect Of Motor Vehicle Accidents

Rate this question


allan

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

Psychological Effect of Motor Vehicle Accidents

This study reviewed the literature that deals with the psychological complaints of whiplash and traffic accident patients, in particular, PTSD. 1

The author focused on the characteristics of PTSD and a victim’s phobic anxiety to both the traumatic event, and driving a car, in general. Overall, he concluded that although psychological morbidity decreases with time, in the long term, victims will have higher than average psychological complaints over the long-term.

The most important predicative risk factor for PTSD is the psychological impact of the stressor: studies show that when patients are tested for intrusion and avoidance reactions immediately following a traumatic event, high scores indicate the onset of PTSD at a later stage. Other predictive factors include a previous PTSD episode, premorbid psychological state, and questionable coping strategies. Severity of physical pain and possible financial compensation has not been shown as predictive risk factors in other studies.

The author dedicates attention to the psychology of coping. She cites a Radanov3 study that found:

“The authors concluded that it was not so much the subject’s premorbid psychological functioning that determined the course of whiplash, but more the psychological problems (including the cognitive ones) that affected the subject’s ability to cope with the somatic problems, particularly pain.”

Avoidance behavior seems to a common pitfall/coping strategy for most car accident victims—avoiding thoughts or emotional reactions to the accident, or just avoiding driving altogether. Mayou2 found that even 4-6 years after the accident, one out of three victims still had anxiety or avoidance behavior towards road travel.

Due to the trend of avoidance behavior, a major aspect of treatment is exposure. Exposing the client to their trauma-related emotions and memories relieves the victim of the emotional weight of the stressful event, and anxiety and other symptoms may very well disappear. For other aspects of treatment the author recommends combining biological, psychological, and psychosocial disciplines. And, treatment should focus on the patient’s response to trauma, not just the physical whiplash symptoms:

“Overall it can be assumed that psychological problems resulting from an accident are underestimated for traffic accident victims in general and for whiplash patients in particular. PTSD is especially common, but usually goes untreated. Instead of focusing most attention on the chronic whiplash complaints, it is recommended that priority be given to coping with the trauma. Afterwards it can be decided whether other complaints require treatment. “

Other studies have demonstrated, on the other hand, that the psychological symptoms disappear after the physical pain has been alleviated. Thus, waiting to decide whether the physical symptoms warrant attention may lead to chronic pain and dissatisfied patients. Very few patients would be willing to wait to deal with the physical pain.

Jaspers JPC. Whiplash and post-traumatic stress disorder. Disability and Rehabilitation, 1998;20(11),197-404.

Radanov BP, Di Stefano G, Schnidrig A. Common whiplash: psychosomatic or somatopsychic? Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 1997;57:486-490.

Mayou RA, Simkin S, Threlfall J. The effects of road traffic accidents on driving behavior. Injury 1994;24: 457-460.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

0 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

There have been no answers to this question yet

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use