Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Bva V. Amc

Rate this question


lu12

Question

Is the AMC able by law OR IN ANY OTHER WAY, to go over a remanded action BY THE BVA to the VHA C&P Examinations. Ex:

1. Schedule the vet fora a va ortho examination for the purpose of ascertaining the etiology of his cervical spine disorder. The claim file most be made available to and be reviewed by the examiner in conjunction with the examination. the examiner report should indicate that the claim file has been reviewed, and that the examiner has taken into account the private and VA medical record records of prior treatment referable to neck pain, including Radioculopathy into the uppers extremities. Base upon a review of the historical records and medical principles, the examiner should provide an opinion as to whether there is a 50% probability that the vat cervical spine disorders is related to either his period of active service, or to his ser-conn low back disability. The examiner should specifically address and reconcile this opinion with the various opinions of the record finding that the vet cervical spine disorder is related to his low back disability and the injuries he sustained during the service.

If the examiner feels that the requested opinion cannot be given without resort to speculation, the examiner should so state.

B)

Then I most ask again:

Is the AMC able in a anyway to go over a remanded action from the BVA, Actions and Instruction given to the C&p Examiners?

B)

I most ask again ??? b/c the C&P examiner seems that he did not understood the BVA instructions at-all

The c&p examiner did not proceed with any kind of:

1. Cervical Spine Physical Evaluation.

2. Uppers Extremities and Radioculopathy Physical Evaluation.

3. Did not wanted to take into account SMR medical evidence

4. Did not wanted to considered C-File, VHA 1st unclear spine medical evaluation.

5. Did not wanted to revised previously IME Opinions.

6. careless about new IME Nexus Opinions.

7. Did not care about 1 st RD from DVA for voc-rehab statement etiology of vet back cond unclear during medical discharge and at the 1st VAE done in 1989.

Examiner Seems he did not wanted to reconciled with the various medical opinions of the records findings and also from the BVA request at all.

Looks like he wanted to base his opinion only on my 1998 SOC response to the VARO, base his opinion on a non medical material evidence of the record

Unless he where following instructions from another sources. Straight forward he told me he could not do anything for me.

Should I challenge this C&P examination for all of the above reasons and before it gets back o the AMC

lu12.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 11
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

"Should I challenge this C&P examination for all of the above reasons and before it gets back o the AMC"

Absolutely- if he did not comply with the Remand instructions and did not comply with the proper C & P criteria-

I think it is always best to challenge any exam (use the actually copy of the results)right away rather than wait for the VA to deny based on results of a faulty exam.

I would ask-if I were you- for your vet reps help in preparing a challenge to this exam- then again you did raise many very good points here to challenge it with.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

First of All:

Have you actually seen and read the results of this C&P?

Do you know what the examiner had to say?

If you cannot answer "yes" to the above questions, then before I did Anything I'd get a copy of this exam and read it very, very carefully.

It just may be an exam that you DO NOT want to bring into question.

In other words, it may be a "favorable" exam.

Go to your Medical Records office at the VAMC and fill out a "FOIA" form and request a copy of your exam. They'll print it out for you while you wait.

"It is cold and we have no blankets.

The little children are freezing to death.

My people, some of them, have run away to the hills, and have no blankets, no food; no one knows where they are-perhaps freezing to death.

I want to have time to look for my children and see how many of them I can find.

Maybe I shall find them among the dead.

Hear me, my chiefs! I am tired; my heart is sick and sad.

From where the sun now stands, I will fight no more forever."

Chief Joseph

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Should I challenge this C&P examination for all of the above reasons and before it gets back o the AMC"

Absolutely- if he did not comply with the Remand instructions and did not comply with the proper C & P criteria-

I think it is always best to challenge any exam (use the actually copy of the results)right away rather than wait for the VA to deny based on results of a faulty exam.

I would ask-if I were you- for your vet reps help in preparing a challenge to this exam- then again you did raise many very good points here to challenge it with.

HELLO, BERTA.

JUST TO THINK ABOUT MY NEW SERV REP I'M ALREADY DEPRESS, ALSO TO SLOW AND NOT A GOOD MOTIVATOR. B)

WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY USE THE ACTUALLY COPY OF THE RESULT?

B) THE APPEAL MANAGEMENT CENTER CLAIMED JURISDICTION OVER MY CASE NOT THE VARO AS IT WAS ORDERED BY THE AMC IN THE FIRST PLACE.

LU12

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Anything remanded back to the VARO goes through the AMC. The AMC is supposed to handle the remand to make sure that everything that is remanded back to the VARO is taken care of properly.

"It is cold and we have no blankets.

The little children are freezing to death.

My people, some of them, have run away to the hills, and have no blankets, no food; no one knows where they are-perhaps freezing to death.

I want to have time to look for my children and see how many of them I can find.

Maybe I shall find them among the dead.

Hear me, my chiefs! I am tired; my heart is sick and sad.

From where the sun now stands, I will fight no more forever."

Chief Joseph

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Larry said it all- he is right- get a copy of the actual C & P and then you will know exactly what to challenge-I was surprised to get a C & P result some time ago that was manipulated in the SOC at the time in the most favorable way -to deny the claim-I knocked down this doctor twice- he prepared more VA BS that I challenged in an SSOC - in those days I didnt even know I could obtain the actual C & P results.I won that claim but ironically I called this same VA doctor some time back and he remembered the claim and said that he definitely saw the medical potential and nexus for my present main AO DMII death claim.I asked him if he could do an opinion on this new claim but he said the VA knew I knocked him down twice and they would not even ask him to opine on one of my claims again.Still- this was only the second VA doctor in a decade who actually saw what my husband's true etiology for his death was- DMII from AO in Nam.Nothing like getting copy of the actual C & P results as soon as they are typed up.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First of All:

Have you actually seen and read the results of this C&P?

Do you know what the examiner had to say?

If you cannot answer "yes" to the above questions, then before I did Anything I'd get a copy of this exam and read it very, very carefully.

It just may be an exam that you DO NOT want to bring into question.

In other words, it may be a "favorable" exam.

Go to your Medical Records office at the VAMC and fill out a "FOIA" form and request a copy of your exam. They'll print it out for you while you wait.

HELLO, 'LARRYJ'

THIS IS A CASE REMANDED BY THE BOARD BUT IT GOT RE-ROUTED TO THE AMC. THE THING IS AND THIS IS WHAT GOT ME MOST FURIOUS DURING THE EXAMINATION:

THE EXAMINER WAS LOOKING TO AN SOC RESPONSE THAT I WROTE TO THE VARO IN 1998 IN WHICH I STATED THAT I SOUGHT AND CLAIM TO THE VHA OUT PT. CLINIC TO MEDICALLY TREAT MY CERVICAL AND ANXIETY DISORDERS AS CHIEF COMPLAINT IN 1996 SINCE AT THAT TIME I WAS 70% S-C...

EXAMINER SAID I DON'T SEE HOW I CAN RELATE THIS TO YOUR SERVICE... AND BECAUSE YOU WROTE AN STATEMENT IN 1998 THAT YOU HAD REQUESTED TO BE TREATED FOR THESE ISSUES FOR THE FIRST TIME IN 1996 THERE IS NOTHING THAT I CAN DO FOR YOU.

I REPLAYED THAT THE EVIDENCE WAS CLEAR I HAD A PRIOR HISTORY OF CERVICAL SPINE DISORDERS PRIVATELY AN WITH IN THE VHA WELL BEFORE 1996 - AND THAT IN 1996 I WANTED MY CERVICAL CONDITION TO BE TREATED AS A CHIEF COMPLAINT B/C I HAD THE RIGHT TO DO SO.

SEE AT THAT TIME, 94-97 EVERY TIME I DID COMPLAIN ABOUT MY CERVICAL - THE VHA MD. PRACTITIONERS REFER THAT IT WAS RELATED TO MY LUMBAR CONDITION BUT NEVER DOCUMENTED ANYTHING ABOUT IT AND MOST OF THE TIME THEY JUST HAVE TO SAY, NOT ENOUGH TIME TREAT ALL THOSE CONDITIONS TOGETHER.

THEN AGAIN I REAFFIRMED THE HE THE EXAMINER WAS ONLY RELATING TO MY RESPONSE TO THE VARO IN ODER TO MAKE HIS STATEMENT.

I HAD TO IDENTIFIED ON THE SAME SOC RESPONSE THAT I DID BY SET 19, 1996 I FILED A CLAIM FOR MY CERVICAL CON. AND THAT ON THE SAME DATE, I ALSO CLAIM MEDICAL TREATMENT AS CHIEF COMPLAIN WITH THE VHA... SEE, AT THROUGHOUT BOTH VA ADMINISTRATIONS THE REGIONAL OFFICE AND THE HEALTHS ADMINISTRATION FROM THE VA.

AND I'M NOT ABLE TO SEE ANY OF MY C&P REPORTS JUST YET B/C THERE IS ONE ISSUE STILL PENDING TO WORK WITH AND FOR THAT MATTER THE NEXT C&P APPOINTMENT IS SET UP FOR DEC 27, 2007.

THANK U 'LARRYJ'

LU12

LU12

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use