Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Hearing At Varo ?

Rate this question


Rockhound

Question

The VA continues to denie my claim for a psychiatric disorder. Saying that the psychiatric disorder was alternatively diagnosed as a personality disorder. I have read and re-read my claims file and the original C&P exam report, that the VA says the C&P examiner changed the diagnosis.

I don't see it or read anything that would lead me to believe, that a change in diagnosis was stated in this report or anything other than the unsubstantiated statement to the change by the claims officer at the time.

How can I, If it is even possible, get a hearing with a claims officer, to get them to show me where the change in diagnosis occured and how it was supported by what the C&P eaminer stated in his report and/or findings?

Thanks, Rockhound

Are you a paranoid schizophrenic

if the ones you think are out to

get you, really are?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 12
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Rockhound,

You posted,

"How can I, If it is even possible, get a hearing with a claims officer"

Answer,

Go here : M21-1MR - Chapter 4 provides your info on hearings

http://www.warms.vba.va.gov/M21_1MR.html

Also,

This is from 38 CFR:

Some info on chang of diagnosis

§ 4.13 Effect of change of diagnosis.

The repercussion upon a current rating of service connection when change is made of a previously assigned diagnosis or etiology must be kept in mind. The aim should be the reconciliation and continuance of the diagnosis or etiology upon which service connection for the disability had been granted. The relevant principle enunciated in §4.125, entitled “Diagnosis of mental disorders,” should have careful attention in this connection. When any change in evaluation is to be made, the rating agency should assure itself that there has been an actual change in the conditions, for better or worse, and not merely a difference in thoroughness of the examination or in use of descriptive terms. This will not, of course, preclude the correction of erroneous ratings, nor will it preclude assignment of a rating in conformity with §4.7.

[29 FR 6718, May 22, 1964, as amended at 61 FR 52700, Oct. 8, 1996]

Hope this helps a vet.

carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

It happened to me Rockhound. Seems like a clerk can make their own diagnosis and than its official as far as VARO is concerned. I had to get a shrink to do and outside medical opinion that said the VA was wrong, more or less call them out and state it was due to service it was a continuing problem and that I still had panic disorder. That started the wheels moving my way.

Good Luck

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rockhound - at what point in the rating process is your claim now? A veteran can meet with a rep of the VA at any point in the claims process. Type yourself a statement in support of claim and request a hearing with a hearing officer at the VARO. If your claim is still active then they should allow you to have a meeting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

carlie: This is the diagnosis part of the C&P exam, I had to type it out, my page editor wouldn't work so I could not otherwise delete the personal information. If you need more information, such as the C&P request form or history summery, it will take me a while to type those out as well.

DIAGNOSIS

At the present time my preferred diagnosis would be that of a personality disorder, inadequate type associated with an inadequate educational experience. There is no evidence of any psychosis present curently. The patient does give a history of convincing visual perceptial distortions on several occasions which, by virtue of their being totally and completely visible, would suggest a toxic etiology, The events precipitating his hospitalization in June of 1973 are very puzzling. The patient did appear to be catatonic at the time of admission. However it is difficult on that basis to explain the firing of shots and the uproar which preceded his admission on the basis of catatonic schizophrenia. The fact that the patient did have a blood alcohol level of 4 mg%, the fact that he has total annesia for the events of 2 or 3 days and the fact that he has total recall after waking up in a shower stall would suggest either a disassociative reaction or some kind toxic brain syndrome. It is not unusual in acute schizophrenic episodes to have amnesia for a great part of the acute episode, however, generally there is some recall with period. I am uncertain whether there is any specific connection between the bizarre behavior prior to his admission and alcohol and/or drug ingestion. Patient does not give a history of regular ingestion of excessive amounts of alcohol or psychoactive drugs. A blood level of 4mg% of alcohol cannot be assessed in terms of its significance unless one knew at what time the blood alcohol was drawn in relation to his admission to the hospital in the emergency room. In summary my major opinions at this time are that the person does represent an inadequate personality with very modest intellectual capabilities (despite the fact that he has tested dueing hospitalization on as having a high average intellectual quotient). No evidence of psychosis is present and on the basis of the history it woud be difficult to substantiate in my opinion a solid diagnosis of schizophrenia.

Are you a paranoid schizophrenic

if the ones you think are out to

get you, really are?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ricky: My appeal time has way since run out, nothing new or material to add to keep it going: They will not accept my cronic major depression disorder as part of my ongoing problem with the Acute Schizophrenic Episode where I have demonstrated moderate and now severe impairment of social and industrial adaptability because my other non service connected health issues are causing it. Besides the fact they don't even recognize the Acute Schizophrenic Episode as such, they changed the diagnosis and called it a personality disorder, inadequate type.

I had an unfortunate experience, not of my choosing, where I was slipped a Micky of LSD in some punch at a party prior to all this problem. I wasn't and nor I have I ever been a drug user, but I feel that the psychotic break I had was due to this. But I have only my word that the LSD insedent occurred. It's been a bum rush ever since. and now I have to take medicine to keep my thoughts in check or I'm liable to go off the deep end agian. The last time involved a gun and shooting, thank God and the Great spirits that pertect me, no one was hurt and no, I do not own or keep any such weapons around me. I get paniky just seeing them on Cops.

I'm rambling, so I better go and take a chill pill. LoL

Rockhound

Are you a paranoid schizophrenic

if the ones you think are out to

get you, really are?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use