Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Chronic Condition- When To File

Rate this question


ruby

Question

I have a question regarding filing for a chronic condition perhaps someone can help me understand what I need to do so I don't screw this one up

Wings posted this in another thread:

For the showing of chronic disease in service, there is required a combination of manifestations sufficient to identify the disease entity, and sufficient observation to establish chronicity at the time, as distinguished by merely isolated findings or a diagnosis including the word "chronic." When the disease identity is established, there is no requirement of evidentiary showing of continuity.

Continuity of symptomatology is required only for the condition noted during service is not, in fact,

shown to be chronic, or where the diagnosis of chronicity may be legitimately questioned. When the fact of chronicity in service is not adequately supported, then a showing of continuity after discharge is required to support the claim. 38 C.F.R. § 3.303(:unsure:.

The chronicity provision of § 3.303(B) is applicable where evidence, regardless of its date, shows that a veteran had a chronic condition in service or during an applicable presumption period and still has such condition. Such evidence must be medical unless it relates to a condition as to which, under the Court's case law, lay observation is competent. If the chronicity provision is not applicable, a claim may still be.... reopened on the basis of § 3.303(B) if the condition is observed during service or any applicable presumption period, continuity of symptomatology is demonstrated thereafter, and competent evidence relates the present condition to that symptomatology.

In 1975, I had ie a cyst that was documented in my SMR I also recieve a 0% for scar.

This cyst reoccurred and I took care of it while in the service, this was located in a area that would be embrassing to most. When I got out of the service within the first year it appeared again really bad and I had to get medical treatment from the VA. Antibiotics and pain meds. Over the past 30 years I have taken care of this problem by lancing them when need be.

Now 30 years later I am told this is a disease process, I have the scars to show that this condition has occurred many times. It can cause tunnelling from one cyst to another and you can have more than one. I can show that I have tunnelling which is bad.

I only have one doc that mentioned this cyst was a disease that probably caused my reactive arthritis. This is too complicated to file for at this time, I just want to file for the new dx of hidradenitis--

So do I file for an increase for the scarring or a new dx.

I know I need to get more docs to agree with this but whats the best way to get a higher rating for now--money is more important at this time. I can't fight for anything for a long period of time at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

x

x

x

Hope this helps! ~Wings

1) Cite 38 C.F.R. § 3.303

See

BVA9421929

DOCKET NO. 93-03 255

http://www.va.gov/vetapp/files3/9421929.txt

Hidradenitis was incurred in service. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1110,

5107 (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. § 3.303(b) (1993).

-snip-

With chronic disease shown as such in service or within the

presumptive period so as to permit a finding of service

connection, subsequent manifestations of the same chronic disease

at any later date, however remote, are service connected, unless

clearly attributable to intercurrent causes. 38 C.F.R.

§ 3.303(b) (1993). For the showing of a chronic disease in

service there is required a combination of manifestations

sufficient to identify the disease entity, and sufficient

observation to establish chronicity at the time, as distinguished

from merely isolated findings or a diagnosis including the word

"Chronic." Id. When the disease entity is established, there is

no requirement of evidentiary showing of continuity, rather

continuity of symptomatology is required only where the condition

noted during service is not chronic or the diagnosis of

chronicity may be legitimately questioned. Id.

In light of the evidence of record that the veteran

currently has hidradenitis, the Board concludes that

the evidence concerning the veteran's claim for

hidradenitis is in relative equipoise, and as such,

the benefit of the doubt principle is applicable.

2) Cite 38 C.F.R. § 4.118

Research diagnostic criteria in the 'Schedule for

Rating Disabilities' with Diagnostic

Codes under 38 C.F.R. § 4.118 !!

See attached PDFE7_4914_1_.pdf

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS

AFFAIRS

38 CFR Part 4

RIN 2900–AM60

Schedule for Rating Disabilities;

Appendices A, B, and C

AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans

Affairs (VA) is revising its Schedule for

Rating Disabilities, Appendices A, B,

and C to include all current diagnostic

codes. Appendix A is also amended to

include all the diagnostic code

historical information since the last

review.

DATES: Effective Date: This amendment

is effective April 19, 2007.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

Schedule for Rating Disabilities, 38 CFR

Part 4, Appendices A, B, and C have not

been updated since July 1, 1988. These

Appendices are tools for users of the

Schedule for Rating Disabilities. The

Appendices reflect changes to the

diagnostic criteria in the Schedule for

Rating Disabilities.

Edited by Wings

USAF 1980-1986, 70% SC PTSD, 100% TDIU (P&T)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ruby,

You might want to study 38 CFR - Part 4 - Schedule for rating disabilities, prior to

filing a claim for increase on Scars, it will be good research.

jmho,

carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Carlie I will look at it.

I am confused as I am not sure if I should ask for an increase or go for a new SC based on the fact that this cyst now has a name(DX) as hidradenitis.

Since I am already rated at for the scar I am thinking that would be easier and faster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scars are not usually life threatening, but a cyst can be, I would go for the chronic condition of the cysts. The longer you wait to get the cyst service connected the harder it is going to be. get your condtion service connect now, not down the road when you feel like it or it becomes a certifiable necessity. A couple of scars won't bring you much if any more compensation, where as if you get your chronic condition approved, you probably will. If it gets worse, it will be easier to get an increase, because you will have addition documentation from the VA for its treatment.

Just my thoughts, from a hard nose procrastinater.

Rockhound

Are you a paranoid schizophrenic

if the ones you think are out to

get you, really are?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I owuld file for a new injury - chronic - the hidradenitis. I would demonstrate its existance as evidenced by the repeated pilonodial cysts (which is what I assume they have been mistakenly calling them). Show the new diagnosis, and request compensation for it.

Personally I had a pilonidal cyst that was surgically removed and then reoccured... I recently undewent yet another surgery to remove it - 6 months ago. The VA did a better job than the civilian surgeon I had the first time... they didn't leave a huge gaping hole at the top of my tailbone.... and so far so good - no reoccurence. However I dont think what you are referring to is you simple pilonodial cyst. I just had a relative get SSD for a cyst which tunneled into a total of 5 others... and its to big to operate on since it wraps around his whole leg.

Dont play the stubborn vet with this medically though, mine got inflamed and caused a systemic infection. I was in the hospital for a couple of days, and at the emergency room a couple more time till it got under control. The thing can kill you simply by infection you lymph nodes - which is what happened to me. So if it gets bad, go to a Doc immediatly. I would make certain of the diagnosis - get a cut and dried one and then file for an increase and just see what they do...

Sorry but thats my best advise. Sorry you got it, and where but its a LOT more common than you might think.

Bob Smith

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use