Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Dav

Rate this question


windy city

Question

Yesterday I had a meeting with a DRO for one of my claims pending about 1/2 before the meeting one of the people in charge of the DAV office called me into his office telling me that it was not in my best interest for this metting to take place because it was going to affect my rating and this rater can look into my file I informed him that I requested the meeting because his people told me that this was the next step to take but he continued to say that I requested the meeting so we went back and foward until the point that this a###### made me mad that I decided to not have the meeting after all. Today I realized I made a mistake and should have gone foward with the meeting and not let this indivdual talk me out of it, In my heart I felt that this guy was working for the best interest of the VA and not me. I need advice on this one I am thinking in chaging organizations and try to request another hearing because I know that I cen get this claim s/c. before I left is office he told me that to not put anymore claims in because they can look into my chart so what am I suppossed to do not file secondary claims because of fear of the VA looking into my chart or trying to reduce my rating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 33
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Windy, they can make an immediate decision based upon the evidence they currently have. They can not just close it they have to make a decision and issue a SOC. Act quick to avoid this. I would type the letter as recommended and fax it to the RO and put attention: Please pass to the appeals team ASAP. That way you avoid the mail room which tould take several weeks to get to the letter and send it to the appeals team. Have the fax print out a copy of the event log which will have that you faxed x number of pages to phone number xxx on xxxx date. It is as good as a signed receipt as proven by a number of BVA cases that I hare read. JMHO

Ricky,

What I had to show that day was evidence and staements from witnesses abd a case from the BVA similar to my case. Should I contact the so from the DAV and let him know or should I turn it in to the va as new evivedence towards my case. I feel that the DAV is not going to help me on this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ricky,

What I had to show that day was evidence and staements from witnesses abd a case from the BVA similar to my case. Should I contact the so from the DAV and let him know or should I turn it in to the va as new evivedence towards my case. I feel that the DAV is not going to help me on this one.

I feel that the way to handle your claim when you have an SO is YOU file any paperwork directly to the VA and provide a copy of what was filed to your SO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel that the way to handle your claim when you have an SO is YOU file any paperwork directly to the VA and provide a copy of what was filed to your SO.

Just got of the phone with the my so from the DAv and asked about what is going to happen with the calim that I was going to argue in front of a DRO, his answer was it in going to the appealls team, I told him that I have statements from friends that were on active duty with me and witness. He told me that if I wanted to continue the case to go ahead and turn in the evidence, but I risk having the va to look at my files but I feel that I have nothing to hide or fear,need advice either to continue with this claim or just let it go?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Windy city-

I am very sorry you had this happen to you. I may take a hit on this statement but who cares. I am a DAV member just like you, and have had the same kind of problems as you. I will say that I also serve many 'hats' in the DAV, on a state level and department, and chapter level. I am part of their honor society as well.

Here is the kicker, I came into the VA to make a claim and they told *ME* a fellow Service Officer (Chapter Level), a Honor Society Member, a Delegate, that they were too busy and that they couldn't take the time (close to business hours close)----here is the kicker, they do not even take my claims......I hate to say this but I am more equipped than MOST of those Service Officers. You know what I did, I made a statement to his boss and (since I am on the State level and a Service Officer as well), I went over his head and went to his bosses boss. Even though, I was I/U, and sitting at a rating of 90% they told me it wasn't in my best interest to file the claim.....because my claims for I/U were still to "newly rated". Guess what I am 100 % P&T. When I go the state convention again, I will bring this up to the National Commander as well. I hate to say it, and this goes for EVERY organization, it is not the Service Organization, it's the people that are in it. Dependent on who you see.

This is something that an Organization that I belong to brought to me to think about....IF the VFW, DAV, AMVETS, etc....are sooo good, why is it that decade after decade things are still problematic in the VA System?

Here are my two cents-

1. Any Vet organization that is stationed IN THE VARO, always has the buddy buddy process with someone in the VA System. Nobody in those organizations wants to bite the hand that feeds them the free room and board, and phones, copiers, faxes, desks, office space, etc. So they will only push so far.

2. Secondly, to work for a Vet Organization at the NSO level, the pay is less than it is to work for the VA system. I know. I have the numbers provided to me. SO unfortunately, in the dog eat dog world, many Accredited Service Officers who work in the Organizations, don't want to burn the bridge with the VA, because it might be the next job they can get with better pay and better benefits. It's sad but true.

Here is what I do, I am affiliated with several organizations, here they are Iraq War Veterans Organization (who sisters with the AWVO Afghanistan War Veterans Organizations), Marine Corps League, Disabled American Veterans, Veterans of Modern Warfare, and I also contribute to the Book and Newsletter what Every Veteran Should Know. When I have to advocate for a Vet, or whatever I do, I like this stance only because it allows me to be independent from the Organizations and as well Independent from the "vested interests" of the organizations. What I mean by that is find someone that is not hand cuffed by the best interests of not biting the hand that feeds them (VA).

Each organization I am affiliated with understands and knows that if I see a problem, I'll bring it up and run it up the VA and down the other. I will let the organizations know that I believe its the best interests of the Veteran that they ALL bring it up to the VA in a unified voice. I am not dependent on ANY organization, and my best interests are with the Veteran at all times.

As far as your claim is concerned, I would like to say you might want to find an Independent Accredited Agent. I know a few, just message me. They are vested for you. It's solely my independent opinion that you should make some statement of claim about the situation you are in and see if they will 'continue' your claim to meet with the DRO. Bring a witness to take notes. Also have someone you feel will fight for you....Unfortunately, the VA system is exactly like a court room, don't go in with someone with half gas to help you.

-Spike-

Vet Advocate

--------------

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Me too.

Danang_1969

I probably will not get another chance to be in front of a DRO since I had my chance and was told not to appear. I am a memeber and not only do I pay dues I also contribute money to the organization and for what to get this treatment. I want to find somebody that is willing to go the extra mile and not to try to intimidate with the VA it makes you feel that you are property of the VA. This sounds silly but are these agents good when it comes to fighting the VA?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use