Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Dav

Rate this question


windy city

Question

Yesterday I had a meeting with a DRO for one of my claims pending about 1/2 before the meeting one of the people in charge of the DAV office called me into his office telling me that it was not in my best interest for this metting to take place because it was going to affect my rating and this rater can look into my file I informed him that I requested the meeting because his people told me that this was the next step to take but he continued to say that I requested the meeting so we went back and foward until the point that this a###### made me mad that I decided to not have the meeting after all. Today I realized I made a mistake and should have gone foward with the meeting and not let this indivdual talk me out of it, In my heart I felt that this guy was working for the best interest of the VA and not me. I need advice on this one I am thinking in chaging organizations and try to request another hearing because I know that I cen get this claim s/c. before I left is office he told me that to not put anymore claims in because they can look into my chart so what am I suppossed to do not file secondary claims because of fear of the VA looking into my chart or trying to reduce my rating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 33
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

The Service Organizations are part of the problem.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Copied the below from one of the other guys. It's the Highest levels that are the worst.....I think you may want to check your numbers, here in Wasgington DC, the Post (no not my favorite paper) posted a report card on service organizations; there were 25 different ones. The DAV along with many other received a "D" because they are NOT funneling money to the Veteran in a very good way...hey I didn't say it, just what I read. But I will tell you as a former DAV NSO a lot of your money goes to lunch and dinner for the National Service Directors and Officiers on 7th Street, right across the street.

See if you can get into the DAV HOST room during Winter Conference, where all the free booze is and watch the dinner tables in the Hotel....all on the DAV credit card, your money at work.....Time for some accountability. CSM-H

"DAV- this is a wonderful org at their highest levels- and they do alot of great things for veterans-I have been a DAV supporter for over 20 years.I get those DAVcertificates that say I am among the largest supporters in the state.You can tell them exactky where you want your donation to go- and it gets there-I know- I checked."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The quote was from me-

I feel their legislative department in DC and the way they spend contributions is excellent-but I only know of a few ways they use this money-

then again I sued my former DAV NSO.

I feel like all vet orgs out there- they have the good side and the bad side.

And I also feel that any vet or widow who gets lousy claims advise should report this to someone higher than their rep-

My POA was recently illegally revoked and the VA GC in DC confirmed that Monday-the attorney handling this is also the same one who wrote the new Rep regs as to re-certification requirements.

I feel -if we get lousy representation and sit by idly and just change reps and dont take a stand-with a formal complaint-either to the org's Commander, or Director or to the General Counsel of the VA - we are setting up these new veterans-men and women disabled from the war -and their survivors -to get the same treatment from these reps.

That is unacceptable to me.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The quote was from me-

I feel their legislative department in DC and the way they spend contributions is excellent-but I only know of a few ways they use this money-

then again I sued my former DAV NSO.

I feel like all vet orgs out there- they have the good side and the bad side.

And I also feel that any vet or widow who gets lousy claims advise should report this to someone higher than their rep-

My POA was recently illegally revoked and the VA GC in DC confirmed that Monday-the attorney handling this is also the same one who wrote the new Rep regs as to re-certification requirements.

I feel -if we get lousy representation and sit by idly and just change reps and dont take a stand-with a formal complaint-either to the org's Commander, or Director or to the General Counsel of the VA - we are setting up these new veterans-men and women disabled from the war -and their survivors -to get the same treatment from these reps.

That is unacceptable to me.

I wrote an email to the National headquarters expressing just exactly what many of you just said. I even got a little tacky in the email, and probably shouldn't have, when I said I would be as well off , if a one-eye monkey was representing me. Have not gotten a response yet. Been a few days, they may respond later, we will see.

Danang_1969

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Berta, Could you PM me? I would like to discuss at your conveinence some of the particulars of how you went about suing the DAV...I am sure I have a case also. thanks, CSM-H

The quote was from me-

I feel their legislative department in DC and the way they spend contributions is excellent-but I only know of a few ways they use this money-

then again I sued my former DAV NSO.

I feel like all vet orgs out there- they have the good side and the bad side.

And I also feel that any vet or widow who gets lousy claims advise should report this to someone higher than their rep-

My POA was recently illegally revoked and the VA GC in DC confirmed that Monday-the attorney handling this is also the same one who wrote the new Rep regs as to re-certification requirements.

I feel -if we get lousy representation and sit by idly and just change reps and dont take a stand-with a formal complaint-either to the org's Commander, or Director or to the General Counsel of the VA - we are setting up these new veterans-men and women disabled from the war -and their survivors -to get the same treatment from these reps.

That is unacceptable to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Windy,

I am not telling you to be on my soapbox, however, a good example. I am at the Chapter Service Officer level. Here is one thing that I am doing for 2 veterans, I've called and am currently organizing Congresswoman Louise Slaughter's office Veterans Direct Aid, Federal Senator Charles Schumer's office Direct Aid, N.Y.S. Senator Maizarz to attend a meeting in the very near future locally, in which I have "circled" the wagons, and I am inviting the United Auto Workers (UAW) who support Veterans, Disabled American Veterans #120, Vietnam Veterans Association #77 (person is on the National Board), Veterans of Modern Warfare #7 Post, Iraq War Veterans NYS Advocate, Marine Corps League #230,going to be there to attend the current issue regarding the DD-214 issue that he has and how it affects his care at the VA level, I might invite the local Airforce Base and the Marine Corps Reserve Base Sgt Major as well. One voice is quiet, but a unified voice must be heard. I am only a Chapter Service Officer. But I also contribute to the publication what every Veteran Should Know. If these people do not attend, I *MAY* release a press release in the publication newsletter, and will bring up the issues to the Department Level. Now there is a difference between myself and who you are dealing with at your NSO. By the way, what VARO or location are you dealing with or DAV NSO Location. I have a directory, it would be ideal if you were in my area.

Berta,

Are you interested in attending this meeting upcoming with the Senators and Congresswoman?

-Spike-

Vet Advocate

--------------

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use