Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Supplemental Needs Trust

Rate this question


augoldminer

Question

Does any one on this forum know how or if a disabled veteran receiving a VA pension can use/have a "supplemental needs trust" set up by the family trust

To receive the inheritance of a father at his death.

It is my understanding that this will let the veteran get the use of the inheritance money for dental, eye care, car repairs, insurance, getting a replacement car,gas money, schooling or other special needs etc, without the loss of his VA disability pension.

And no the father can not set this up at this time as he has alzheimer's.

And the veteran's disability is physical not mental

so he does not need a guardian to administer it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

You are probably going to want to see an attorney on this one. Special Needs Trusts can get kind of tricky. I've looked into these for quite some time - as my son is developmentally disabled.

But, yes a trust can be set up to SUPPLEMENT - and NOT REPLACE any government benefits. It is based on the idea that your father has no legal duty to support you - and therefore he can set money aside in a trust - and the trust does not have to be used for your support. With your father unable to set up the trust - you would need to check into other ways it can be set up.

I don't think you would have to have a guardian - over either your person or your estate - but the trust would have to have a trustee. YOU could not have any decision making capacity over the money. And actually the trust would not legally be YOURS. The money belongs to the trust and it can be spent on you (you are the beneficiary of the trust - but the trust is it's own entity).

I know the trustee has to have complete discretion over how the money is spent. That doesn't mean the trustee can't listen to your opinion - but they have to have complete legal control of the money - and complete discretion as to how it is spent. (Therefore - no one can order them to spend it any other way).

I am not sure how the VA handles "in kind" contributions.

I know with SSI - a trustee has to watch out paying for any housing or food costs - but they can pay for other things (but not give the person the money directly). And they also have to watch purchasing things for the beneficiary that would put them over the asset limits.

Even many estate attorneys don't handle special needs trusts. But some attorneys specialize in them. Everything has to be worded "just right."

A good place to seek more info on these is also in forums for parents of children with disabilities.

Free

Does any one on this forum know how or if a disabled veteran receiving a VA pension can use/have a "supplemental needs trust" set up by the family trust

To receive the inheritance of a father at his death.

It is my understanding that this will let the veteran get the use of the inheritance money for dental, eye care, car repairs, insurance, getting a replacement car,gas money, schooling or other special needs etc, without the loss of his VA disability pension.

And no the father can not set this up at this time as he has alzheimer's.

And the veteran's disability is physical not mental

so he does not need a guardian to administer it.

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not sure if this link will be too long - but I searched Veteran Special Need Trust in Google - and it brought up this book.

http://books.google.com/books?id=dnfbveKmF...Z9qu71051GdSXik

In this - It states that the VA General Council decided in one case that the trust DID count as a resource. But it points out that the trust stated it ws to pay for food, shelter, clothing.

So, if the trust designates that trust money has to be used for that - then they can count it.

I remember they USED to word them to specifically state that the trust COULD NOT be used to pay for anything the government would pay for - and could ONLY be used for SUPPLEMENTING.

But the going thing is that the trust has to allow the trustee COMPLETE discretion.

The trust can't state one way or another what the money can or cannot be used for.

I think that is to protect the trusts more. Because NO ONE can come in and MAKE the Trustee to pay for ANYTHING. The money is only available for whatever the trustee decides it is available for.

http://www.va.gov/vetapp05/files2/0513555.txt

The above link is a BVA decision - where they DID count the Trust - but that was because the veteran had received an inheritance - and converted that into a trust. As the money was HER propery before going into the Trust - they counted it.

They specifically say:

The question which must be answered is whether the Trust is

the veteran's property. The Board finds that it is. While

it is true that her trustees retain control over the trust,

the Board finds that it must be considered her property in

light the applicable GC opinion, which is binding precedent

on the Board.

I only came up with two results on a BVA search -- it is an interesting case - but it seems like the decision to count the trust was because it became her property and THEN was transfered into the trust.

Again, it is worth investing in a specialized attorney for setting these up right.

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use