Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Mh Progress Notes

Rate this question


hurryupnwait

Question

Hi All

In my mental health notes it states.

Axis 1 depression NOS, R/O mood, D/O secondary to GMC,

Anyone have any idea what this means?

Happy Trails

Paul

When I count my blessings I count my family and friends twice.

If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there.

Well done is better than well said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 24
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

T&B,

The GAF score is really just the examiner's assessment of where you are at emotionally based on your occupational and social limitations and your symptoms. It is really just basically a SWAG (scientific wild ass guess). They don't "test" you for it, it is simply their observational assessment of you when they see you. As I understand it, VA shrinks give you a GAF at almost every session you have with them though a civilian shrink typically doesn't.

And yes, I agree with others here who state that the GAF scores given by the VA are inconsistent based on the subjective view of the examiner. In an ideal world, multiple examiners at the same session would give you the same GAF but that's just not the case. In an effort to get more standardized GAF scores, the VA supposedly uses the following tool to help determine your GAF score:

http://www.desertpacific.mirecc.va.gov/gaf...-scale-6-07.pdf

However, a quick look at the three indexes they are supposed to use lined up with your symptoms and limitations and a little quick math (figure out where you are on each of the three indexes, add them up and divide by 3 to get your GAF score) will show you that often the VA gives you a higher GAF than their own chart would deem appropriate.

Now, a couple things jump out at me about your C&P exam. Yes, I agree that saying you had a cushy job was stupid of the examiner, but it makes me assume they at least understood the military which is something.

I did not have the PTSD exam, I had the standard mental health exam.

Have you reviewed the PTSD exam to make sure you were asked all the questions required on a PTSD C&P exam?

Have you gotten a copy of your C&P exam to see just what was written?

These are two critical things I learned here on hadit that helped me fight my rating.

Here is a link to the VA PTSD initial exam.

http://www.vba.va.gov/bln/21/Benefits/exams/disexm43.htm

If yours was a follow on exam there is another worksheet that you can get at the VA website as well.

The other thing to do is get a copy of your C&P exam. You can call the place you took the C&P or you may have to call the hospital that is the parent unit of the C&P examination site. Don't let them tell you that you have to ask the VA, that's bs. You can ask them and they have to give it to you. Once I got the right person (many, many phone calls and much frustration, if Pete and other hadit members had not kept encouraging me to get my C&P exam I would have given up so let me say up front - don't give up until you have a copy of it) he faxed me a release form and mailed it out that day and I had it in a couple of days.

Low and behold, while the VA had rated me 50% the C&P examiner stated I was 100% disabled which is part of what I used for my NOD.

Now, I hope I haven't overwhelmed you with my opinion and information. The two most important things to take away from this are: make sure you understand the PTSD worksheet that they were supposed to use and that you were asked every question so you had a chance to get your answer on record and two, get a copy of your C&P exam.

Are you going to NOD the percentage or is it an accurate reflection of your sx?

Good luck and keep us posted,

TS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

T&B,

I concur with John. If you are going to put in a NOD then you need a good IMO. I found a shrink who does SS claims and while it was spendy ($125/hr for every hour he talked to me and/or my spouse plus the same for the time it took him to write the report - the IMO paid for itself after a couple of month 100% P&T vs 50%).

Keep us posted,

TS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

TS, no you didn't overwhelm me with your post, if anything I would say impressed. I haven't read my c-p and actually have not seen my c-file. I have put a nod in last April for rating, since then I have hired an atty. and we have put another nod in. Right now I am waiting for the c-file as is my atty. I have contacted IRIS and they said I should be getting a letter soon. Hopefully that is regarding my C-file.Thanks.

T&B

Edited by tagandbag

" In my many years I have come to a conclusion that one useless man is a shame, two is a law firm and three or more is a Congress"

- John Adams

Link to comment
Share on other sites

T&B,

Keep us posted on how things go w/ the attorney. I got my c-file in about 4 weeks the first time and the second time (after my final decision) it was delayed because they wanted $10 since I'd already gotten a copy. I sent in a money order and it arrived in another couple of weeks. But I got a copy of my C&P exam from the major hospital that the C&P unit is affiliated with well before I got my c-file. Needless to say, I was amazed to find out that there were questions about my ability to function independently that I had NOT been asked and low and behold, that was the rationale they used to lowball me 50% (that my disability did not affect my ability to function independently). That's also how I found out that the C&P examiner stated I was 100% disabled because I couldn't work due to bp sx. The rater just ignored that part as well as the reg that says a rater cannot use their own opinion in the face of a medical opinion. If the VA would just follow their own rules our claims would be properly adjudicated in the first round but that's no secret to any vet who's worked a claim.

Good luck and do let us know how things go with the attorney.

TS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Thanks TS, next week when I go to group, I'll see if I can get a copy of my CP.

TB

" In my many years I have come to a conclusion that one useless man is a shame, two is a law firm and three or more is a Congress"

- John Adams

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use